On December 16, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath firmly defended the slogan “Jai Sri Ram,” saying that it is not a communal phrase but a deeply ingrained symbol of faith. He refuted opposition claims that chanting the slogan and allowing Hindu processions to pass through Muslim-majority areas had provoked the violence in Sambhal and Bahraich.
Yogi posed a critical question to his critics: “If a Muslim procession can pass through a Hindu locality and in front of a temple, why shouldn’t a Hindu procession be allowed to pass through a Muslim area?” He stressed that the nation’s future would be shaped by the values and traditions of figures like Ram, Krishna, and Buddha, rather than by those of historical conquerors such as Babur and Aurangzeb.
Speaking in the state assembly during a discussion on the violence in Sambhal, Yogi explained that the name of Lord Ram holds great significance in the lives of millions. “People greet each other with ‘Ram Ram.’ Even during funeral processions, the name of Ram is invoked… Without Ram, nothing happens in our lives… So, how can ‘Jai Sri Ram’ be considered a communal slogan?” he questioned, passionately defending the slogan as a reflection of the cultural and religious identity of the Hindu community.
Addressing the situation in Bahraich, Yogi highlighted that all necessary arrangements were made for the smooth conduct of the traditional procession. However, allegations arose that provocative slogans were raised during the event. “Let me be clear: the slogan ‘Jai Sri Ram’ is not provocative. It is a slogan that signifies our faith and belief. If tomorrow, I were to say that I don’t like the slogan ‘Allah Hu Akbar,’ would you agree with me?” he asked, drawing a parallel to emphasise the sanctity and reverence behind religious expressions.
Turning to the unrest in Sambhal, Yogi stated that the administration and police had acted in accordance with a court order, which mandated a survey of a mosque site. He indicated that the violence had escalated after Friday prayers and sermons, and added, “What happened thereafter is for everyone to see.” The Chief Minister assured the house that his government would initiate a judicial commission to investigate the incident thoroughly and would present the findings in the assembly.
