New Parliament should be inaugurated by the President instead of PM: PIL filed in Supreme Court
July 14, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
MAGAZINE
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS in News
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

New Parliament should be inaugurated by the President instead of PM: PIL filed in Supreme Court

It is pertinent to note that the petitioner’s arguments before the Supreme Court are in consonance with the opposition parties’ joint statement against PM Narendra Modi inaugurating the new Parliament building

by WEB DESK
May 25, 2023, 02:15 pm IST
in Bharat
New Parliament Building, Supreme Court (in Inset)

New Parliament Building, Supreme Court (in Inset)

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to the Lok Sabha Secretariat that the President of India should inaugurate the new Parliament building. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to inaugurate the new Parliament on May 28.

The petitioner argues that the Lok Sabha Secretariat has violated the Constitution of India by not inviting the President to the inauguration. The petitioner refers to Article 79 of the Constitution which reads that the Parliament consists of the President and the two houses.

Furthermore, the petitioner submitted that the President is the first citizen of the country and has the power to summon and prorogue the Parliament sessions. The petitioner also submits that the President appoints the Prime Minister and other ministers. The petitioner further submits that all executive decisions are taken in the name of the President, therefore, not inviting the President for the inauguration is a humiliation and violation of the Constitution.

“President of India Smt. Droupadi Murmu is not being invited to the inauguration of the new Parliament Building. Indian President enjoys certain powers and performs a variety of ceremonial functions. The powers of the President include Executive, Legislative, Judiciary, emergency, and military powers…,” the petition read.

It is pertinent to note that the petitioner’s arguments before the Supreme Court are in consonance with the opposition parties’ joint statement against PM Narendra Modi inaugurating the new Parliament building.

Opposition Boycotts Parliament’s Inauguration

Nineteen Opposition parties, including Congress, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Shiv Sena (UBT), Trinamool Congress (TMC), and Janata Dal (United), announced they will boycott the inauguration of the new Parliament building on May 28.

“The inauguration of a new Parliament building is a momentous occasion. Despite our belief that the government is threatening democracy, and our disapproval of the autocratic manner in which the new Parliament was built, we were open to sinking our differences and marking this occasion. However, Prime Minister Modi’s decision to inaugurate the new Parliament building by himself, completely sidelining President Murmu, is not only a grave insult but a direct assault on our democracy which demands a commensurate response”, the statement read.

The statement read, “The Constitution of India states, in Article 79’ which states, “There shall be a Parliament for the Union which shall consist of the President and two Houses to be known respectively as the Council of States and the House of the People.” The President is not only the Head of State in India, but also an integral part of the Parliament. She summons, prorogues, and addresses the Parliament. She must assent for an Act of Parliament to take effect.”

“In short, the Parliament cannot function without the President. Yet, the Prime Minister has decided to inaugurate the new Parliament building without her. This undignified act insults the high office of the President, and violates the letter and spirit of the Constitution. It undermines the spirit of inclusion which saw the nation celebrate its first woman Adivasi President,” the statement added.

“We announce our collective decision to boycott the inauguration of the new Parliament building. We will continue to fight – in letter, in spirit, and in substance – against this authoritarian Prime Minister and his government, and take our message directly to the people of India” the statement reads.

Topics: Supreme CourtPrime MinisterDroupadi MurmuPILParliament RowParliament InaugurationNarendra ModiPresident
Share9TweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

Manipur Violence: Kuki militants killed 1 person and set several houses on fire; PWD Minister’s house vandalised

Next News

Synergising Indo-Nepal Bilateral Relations: Paving the path for a promising future

Related News

Bihar Deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha

Bihar voter revision: Dy CM Vijay Sinha welcomes SC decision, says ‘opposition insults constitutional institutions’

A representative image

Bihar: ECI voter revision drive to continue; SC asks commission to consider Aadhaar, ration cards as ID proof

India sets the record straight at G7: PM Modi rejects US mediation, reinforces sovereign stand on Indo-Pak conflict

Ascendant of India at BRICS: PM Modi leads strategic shift amid absence of Xi and global bloc realignment

A representative image

Bihar voter list revision: SC agrees to hear petition challenging ECI drive, refuses to pause process for now

11 years, 11 triumphs: How PM Modi secured his citizens worldwide

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Representative image

UPI Revolution in India: IMF hails digital payment system as it surpasses Visa with 650 million daily transactions

India’s First Undersea Bullet Train Tunnel Breakthrough Completed in Mumbai

Bharat on Fast Track: Modi govt achieve first undersea bullet train tunnel in Mumbai with Japanese tech giant

Representative image

Indian Railways to install CCTV cameras in all 74,000 coaches and 15,000 locomotives to strengthen passenger safety

Punjab: 4 men posing as Nihangs, including a gurdwara granthi arrested within 10 hrs for abducting & looting a woman

Representative Image

Ramayana Diplomacy? Pakistan uses Hindu epic to soften global image after Ops Sindoor & Indus treaty fallout

Ejaz, man accused of using fake identity and forcing religious conversion (Left)

UP: VHP demands action against Ejaz for posing as Hindu Azad Singh to marry woman & forced her and daughter to convert

USA: FBI arrests 8 including India’s ‘MOST WANTED’ Khalistani terrorist Pavittar Batala; Assault rifles seized

Site of the Ahmedabad plane crash

Ahmedabad Flight Crash: Fuel switches replaced in 2019 and 2023, mystery deepens over who turned off fuel control

Dalit Hindu e-rickshaw driver named Ankit brutally attacked by Muslim mob for playing bhajans

Uttar Pradesh: Brutal assault on Dalit Hindu e-rickshaw driver in Moradabad for playing Shiv bhajan during Sawan

Operation Kalanemi: Crackdown by Uttarakhand government against fake religious leaders 

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies