Supreme Court dismisses plea claiming non-Tribals in 'Scheduled Area' are 'unlawful occupants'; calls it “preposterous”
May 24, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
MAGAZINE
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS in News
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Organiser Weekly is Hiring!
Home Bharat

Supreme Court dismisses plea claiming non-Tribals in ‘Scheduled Area’ are ‘unlawful occupants’; calls it “preposterous”

The Supreme Court also rejected the contention that all people not belonging to Scheduled Tribes are unlawful occupants in the Scheduled Area

by Shreeyash
May 15, 2023, 12:00 pm IST
in Bharat, Odisha
Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

On May 10, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea contending that no one, except the members of the Scheduled Tribes, has the right to settle down in the Scheduled Area. It was argued that all people, not belonging to Scheduled Tribes, residing in the Scheduled Area are unlawful occupants and therefore, disentitled to exercise their right to vote.

Furthermore, it was argued that all constituencies in the Scheduled Area should be declared as reserved constituencies under Articles 330 and 332 of the Constitution. It was also argued that no candidates, other than the candidates belonging to the Scheduled Tribes, should have the right to contest the Legislative Assembly elections or the Lok Sabha elections in the Scheduled Area.

The appellant also argued that none of the laws enacted by the Government of India or the State Legislature are applicable to the Scheduled Area unless there is a specific notification issued under sub-¬clause (1) of Clause 5 of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution by the Governor declaring that any particular law will be applicable to the Scheduled Area.

The Supreme Court notes that the Governor has the power to direct that a Central or State law will not be applicable to a Scheduled Area in the State, or will be applicable subject to certain modifications, under sub-¬clause (1) of Clause 5 of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution. The court said, “The first part of sub¬clause (1) proceeds on the footing that all the State and Central legislations applicable to a State are applicable to the Scheduled Areas within the said State. Otherwise, there was no reason to confer a power on the Hon’ble Governor to declare that particular legislation will not apply to a particular Scheduled Area.”

Furthermore, the Supreme Court noted, “By virtue of Article 395, the Government of India Act, 1935 has been repealed… Thus, the reliance placed on sub¬-Section (1) of Section 92 of the Government of India Act, 1935 is not at all relevant.” The Supreme Court further said, “The contention raised by the appellant that unless there is a specific notification issued by the Hon’ble Governor applying Central or State laws to a Scheduled Area, the said laws will not apply to the said Scheduled Area, to say the least, is preposterous.”

The Supreme Court held that all Central and State laws applicable to the entire State of Orissa will continue to be applicable unless the Governor issues a specific notification, in the exercise of powers under sub-clause (1) of Clause 5 of the Fifth Schedule to make a particular enactment partially, or fully, inapplicable.

The Supreme Court further held that the powers of the Governor under Clause 5 of the Fifth Schedule is restricted to directing that a particular law will not apply to the Scheduled Area or it will apply with such modifications as may be specified in the notification. Furthermore, the Supreme Court held that the powers of the Governor under Clause 5 of the Fifth Schedule do not supersede the Fundamental Rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court also rejected the contention that all people not belonging to Scheduled Tribes are unlawful occupants in the Scheduled Area. The court upheld the fundamental right granted under Article 19(1)(e) of the Constitution which allows all citizens to reside and settle in any part of India. The court said, “Therefore, the Fundamental Rights conferred by sub¬clause (e) of Article 19(1) of the Constitution of India on the citizens can also be exercised in relation to the Scheduled Area.”

The Supreme Court concluded, “We are, therefore, of the view that there is absolutely no merit in the appeal, and the High Court was right when it dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant. Only in view of the claim that the appellant is working for the welfare of the tribals that we refrain from saddling the appellant with costs.”

Topics: OdishaSupreme Court Of IndiaScheduled TribesGovernment of IndiaOrissaScheduled AreasCentral LawsUnlawful OccupantsConstitution of IndiaFifth ScheduleSupreme CourtState Laws
Share13TweetSendShareSend
Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel
Previous News

Manipur Violence: Reminder of the Uphill Task

Next News

Muslim Deputy CM and 5 Ministers in Karnataka; Waqf Board chief demands from Congress in return of Muslim votes

Related News

Indian woman holding infant baby in hand (Representative image, source: istock)

Tamil Nadu: SC upholds maternity leave as reproductive right saying, it can’t be restricted by state’s two-child policy

Restoring the Constitutional Balance: Presidential powers Vs judicial overreach

Mysore Palace

Karnataka: SC directs immediate compensation of Rs 3,400 Cr to Mysore Royal Family, major setback for Sidda govt

Tamil Nadu: SC puts brake on ED probe into DMK-linked TASMAC case

Ashoka professor gets interim bail, rapped for 'cheap publicity' in Op Sindoor post

‘Right to free speech fine; where is the duty?’ SC to Professor Mahmudabad, while granting interim bail

Supreme Court says right to reside in Bharat is exclusive to its citizens; Secures the Nation from illegal Rohingyas 

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Illegal Bangladeshi nationals living in India deported under massive search operation by Delhi Police

Delhi Police crack down on illegal immigration: 121 suspected Bangladeshi nationals detained in week-long operation

Indian woman holding infant baby in hand (Representative image, source: istock)

Tamil Nadu: SC upholds maternity leave as reproductive right saying, it can’t be restricted by state’s two-child policy

Kerala: Shashi Tharoor slams govt’s Rs 10 crore aid to Turkey calling it a, “Misplaced Generosity”

India champions BRICS digital summit with Sanchar Saathi and Aadhaar at the forefront

The stitched ship is a recreation of a 5th century CE ship, inspired by a painting from the Ajanta Caves

Sailing into Amrit Kaal: Navy inducts ancient stitched ship, Honouring India’s maritime legacy

A representative image

West Bengal: Bangladeshi national Imran Ahmed with forged documents booked for keeping ‘Chinese made drones’ illegally

Ex-SC Judge KT Thomas

“Secularism does not mean only ‘No Religion’, Indira was a dictator, Modi ensured progress”: Ex-SC Judge KT Thomas

Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan

“Most threatened nation on earth, Israel doesn’t have it”: CDS dismisses case for a written National Security Strategy

Arman, Tufail and Tarif booked by Haryana and Uttarakhand Police

Dreams of achieving Gazwa-e-Hind Crushed: Cops nab ISI spies Tarif, Tufail & Aman

S Jaishankar and Johann Wadephul

Germany supports India’s fight against terrorism, post-Pahalgam attack says, ‘Has every right to…’

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies