Waqf Row: Govt of India informs Delhi High Court that about 120 petitions are pending before courts against Waqf Act
July 13, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
MAGAZINE
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS in News
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Waqf Row: Govt of India informs Delhi High Court that about 120 petitions are pending before courts against Waqf Act

Government of India (GoI) submitted an application for a three months’ extension to file a reply in PIL challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf Act’s provisions

by WEB DESK
Mar 22, 2023, 05:30 pm IST
in Bharat, Delhi
From Left: Delhi High Court, Delhi Waqf Board

From Left: Delhi High Court, Delhi Waqf Board

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

Delhi, India: On March 20, the Government of India (GoI) informed the Delhi High Court that about 120 petitions are pending before various courts across India challenging the provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995.

The GoI made this submission in an application seeking an extension of time to file a response to the petitioner Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay’s PIL challenging the constitutional validity of various provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995.

Furthermore, the GoI submitted that “a Transfer Petition (Civil) No.1983 of 2022 has been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court by the Petitioner in the present case. It is submitted that this Transfer Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 139(A) and the case is pending with the Hon’ble Supreme Court.”

The GoI submitted that it is essential for them to ensure a clear and consistent view is taken considering that multiple petitions challenging various sections of the Waqf Act, 1995, are pending before the courts. The GoI said that the process involves “thorough examination of petitions, consultation/vetting by Government Counsels and discussions with other stakeholders, such as State Governments.” Therefore, the GoI filed an application seeking an extension of three months’ time to file a reply in the case.

The Delhi High Court bench comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sachin Datta granted the extension of time to the GoI’s standing counsel Kirtiman Singh to take instructions on the transfer and consolidation of all cases. Furthermore, the Court granted two weeks’ time to Delhi Waqf Board to file an impleadment application in the case, Live Law reported. The Court has listed the next hearing for the PIL on July 26.

In his PIL, the petitioner submitted that the “State cannot make any law giving special status and rights to a particular religious community within the four corners of Constitutional provisions and State cannot show its inclination towards one religion in a Secular State.”

He submitted, “The interest of Hindus Jains Buddhists Sikhs and other Non-Islamic religious communities is involved in the matter and public in general is suffering due to conferment of unbridled powers to Waqf Boards and granting special status to Waqf properties and thus others are being discriminated before law and denied equal protection of law.”

“There is no provision to save the interest of properties belonging to non-Muhammdans from being illegally included in the list of Waqf. The Waqf Boards in arbitrary manner without due process of law, are taking advantage of undue powers under the Act 1995 captures lands of other communities even the Government and Nazul land over which no Muslim may have any right or claim,” he added.

The petitioner submitted “The Hon’ble Court in catena of decisions has held that the concept of secularism is embedded in the very theme of the Constitution. No doubt Articles 14, 15, 27 restrain the State from making any law or taking any action on the basis of religion or to make any provision for the benefit of one religion and that the tax payer money cannot be utilize for the promotion of a religion.”

The petitioner submitted “That it is relevant to mention that the Parliament by enacting the places of worship (Special Provision Act,1991) has declared that the nature of religious property like temple, mosque, church etc. existing on 15.08.1947 shall be maintained. The effect of Section 107 is that Muslims can recover their properties without being obstructed by any length of time but at the same time Hindus will be deprived to regain their properties captured by Muslims in utter violation of law, even by raising constructions at the same very place where temple existed. Therefore, the impugned provision is against the spirit of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India.”

The petitioner has prayed to the Delhi High Court to “direct and declare that Centre can enact only Uniform Law for Trust and Trustees, Charities and Charitable Institutions, and Religious Endowments and Institutions as enumerated in Item 10 and 28 of the List-III of Seventh Schedule in consonance with Articles 14-15; and can’t make separate law for Waqf and Waqf properties.

The petitioner has made the following prayers to the Delhi High Court:

  1. “direct and declare that Centre can enact only Uniform Law for Trust and Trustees, Charities and Charitable Institutions, and Religious Endowments and Institutions as enumerated in Item 10 and 28 of the List-III of Seventh Schedule in consonance with Articles 14-15; and can’t make separate law for Waqf and Waqf properties.
  2. direct and declare that Sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14 of the Waqf Act, 1995 are manifestly arbitrary, irrational and offend Articles 14-15 of the Constitution of India, hence void and inoperative.
  3. alternatively, direct & declare that the dispute relating to religious properties shall be decided by the Civil Court only under Section 9 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908, and not by Waqf Tribunal.
  4. direct the Centre or Law Commission of India to draft a ‘Uniform Code for Trust-Trustees and Charities-Charitable Institutions’ in spirit of Articles 14-15 and publish it for public debate and feedback.”

Topics: public interest litigationWaqf Act PILSecularismGovernment of IndiaAshwini Kumar UpadhyayDelhi Waqf BoardWaqf propertiesWaqf Act
Share13TweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

AAP’s dinner diplomacy spurned by Opposition Chief Ministers

Next News

Gujarat: Hindus demand implementation of Disturbed Areas Act (2019) in Bhavnagar to prevent demography change

Related News

Revisiting ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’ in the Preamble: Reclaiming India's Constitutional Integrity

Revisiting ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’ in the Preamble: Reclaiming India’s Constitutional Integrity

Emergency-Era amendments under lens; The enduring debate on basic structure of Indian Constitution

Ambedkar rejected secularism despite partition wounds; remarks by Hosabale Ji now being distorted, says J. Nandakumar

Ambedkar rejected secularism despite partition wounds; remarks by Hosabale Ji now being distorted: J Nandakumar

Students on flight, returning to India from Iran

Protecting Indian Lives: Safe return of students from Iran

Kiren Rijiju launches UMEED central portal for Waqf properties, promises transparency and public participation

Representative image (Source: Business Today)

SC rejects Delhi Waqf Board’s claim over pre-independence Gurudwara in Shahdara, Cites its religious use since 1948

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Representative image by AI

Tamil Nadu: Sexual assaults on children and women continue unabated under DMK rule

Representative Image of Maoists

Chhattisgarh: “23 Maoists carrying cumulative bounty of Rs 1.18cr” surrender in Sukma

Excavation process of sculptures being carried out by ASI officials in Phooldari village of Panna

Ancient Secret of Panna unveiled: Fifth-Century art found, ASI gets into action

Representative image

Black Gold Boom in India: 12 discoveries fueling energy independence by 2025

C. Sadanandan Master: From CPI(M) Attack to Rajya Sabha Glory

Sadanandan Master: Symbol of resistance to killing fields of Kannur by Communists nominated to Rajya Sabha

Harsh Vardhan Shringla, Ujjwal Nikam, Meenakshi Jain, and C. Sadanandan Master nominated to Rajya Sabha

Diplomat Shringla, prosecutor Nikam, historian Meenakshi Jain, social worker Sadanandan Master nominated to Rajya Sabha

A representative image, courtesy: orfoline.org

Bihar: ‘Four SSB jawans injured’ in attack by mob along Indo-Nepal border

Representative image

Bharat Utsav in Russia brings rich cultural legacy and artistic spirit of India

(Left) Late Sanjay Gandhi with his mother nad late former PM Minister of India Indira Gandhi who had imposed emergency in 1975

Sanjay Gandhi: The Fascist Prince of the 1975 Emergency

Ayodhya Ram Mandir

Ayodhya: Ticketing facility now at Ram Mandir premises; Indian Railways brings seamless travel experience to pilgrims

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies