Sabarimala case - Organiser

Sabarimala case

Nine Member Constitution Bench questions the legitimacy of PIL-driven intervention in Sabarimala traditions, raising sharp observations on faith, locus standi and judicial process.

Sabarimala Case: ‘Mind your business’, SC slams petitioner Naushad Khan of Young Lawyers Association

Representative image

No dispute on women entering Mosques since Prophet’s time: Justice Amanullah during SC hearing

Centre backs mandir autonomy, stresses limited state role and respect for diverse religious practices

Sabarimala Case: Centre tells Supreme Court it opposes state control of Mandirs, backs autonomy

Supreme Court of India bench hears Sabarimala review pleas as Justice B. V. Nagarathna questions non-devotee challenges to rituals

Sabarimala Case: “Believers don’t question rituals; non-believers can’t challenge them,” says Justice B. V. Nagarathna

During Sabarimala review hearings, Supreme Court underscores limits of reform and cautions against diluting core religious beliefs

Religion cannot be “Hollowed Out” in the name of social reform, says Supreme Court in Sabarimala case

SC bench led by CJI Surya Kant hears Sabarimala case, flags PIL misuse and stresses stricter locus standi norms

SC flags PIL misuse, says Sabarimala plea would have been dismissed, backs stricter locus standi in faith cases

Sabrimala temple

Sabarimala Hearing: Centre tells Supreme Court temple traditions linked to deity’s nature, not open to judicial review

Jainanchya Yugbhushansuriji defends the Sabarimala tradition saying, ‘Dharma is wider than state’

Supreme Court nine-judge bench will revisit 2018 Sabarimala case verdict from April 7

The Supreme Court of the United States

Judiciary: Is Constitutional Morality American Morality?