New Delhi: A petition condemning the reported derogatory reference to Prof. V. Kamakoti, Director of IIT Madras, by Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra has gathered more than 14,000 verified signatures on Change.org. The petition, launched on August 1, 2026, has rapidly become a significant expression of concern within the academic and scientific communities, receiving support from people across India’s disciplines, institutions, and states. Overseas Indian scientists from more than 38 countries have lent their support to the petition.
Addressed to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the petition strongly objects to the use of the expression “Gau Mutra Expert” in reference to Prof. Kamakoti during parliamentary proceedings. The petition argues that such a personal and disparaging expression is neither legitimate political criticism nor reasoned debate, and that it undermines the dignity of an eminent scientist, educator, and the institution he leads.
14,000 people have signed the petition against Priyanka Vadra demanding accountability over the derogatory reference to IIT Madras Director Prof. V. Kamakoti.
The petition, launched on August 1, has received support from academics, scientists and researchers across India, with… pic.twitter.com/TUT8CAHKtX
— Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) August 13, 2026
BJP leader Amit Malaviya also highlighted the growing support for the petition in a post on X, writing:
“14,000 people have signed the petition against Priyanka Vadra demanding accountability over the derogatory reference to IIT Madras Director Prof. V. Kamakoti. The petition, launched on August 1, has received support from academics, scientists and researchers across India, with overseas Indian scientists from more than 38 countries also backing it. This is no longer about politics. It is about basic civility and respect for India’s scientific and academic community. 14,000 signatures and counting.”
Prof. Kamakoti has made distinguished contributions to computer architecture, cybersecurity, indigenous processor development through the SHAKTI project, digital technologies and national educational initiatives. The petition emphasises that public discourse should recognise scholars for their academic and professional contributions rather than subject them to personal ridicule.
The petition has two clear demands
1. The Speaker should take cognisance of the widespread concern expressed by the academic and scientific community over the remark.
2. The Member of Parliament concerned should withdraw the expression and express regret for its personal and derogatory nature, thereby reaffirming the importance of respectful parliamentary discourse.
The petition makes clear that the campaign is not a defence of any political party, government or ideology. It is an appeal to protect the dignity of India’s teachers, scientists, researchers and academic institutions. The organisers call upon professors, scientists, researchers, teachers, academic administrators, alumni, students and members of the global academic community to stand together for civility, evidence-based debate and respect for scholarship.
