Recognising Same-sex relations as marriage: Need open debate for legislation; Judiciary has no role to play
July 12, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
MAGAZINE
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS in News
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Recognising Same-sex relations as marriage: Need open debate for legislation; Judiciary has no role to play

This is not the first time courts have gone on overdrive with judicial overreach. The Supreme Court’s stand on legalising same-sex marriages is yet another example of its bid to trample on the powers of the executive and Parliament

by Adv Karan Thakur
Mar 19, 2023, 06:10 pm IST
in Bharat
Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

While the demarcation of powers between the three is clear, repeated bid by the courts to stamp on someone else’s toe is making things worse for an already chaotic but working democratic setup that India has evolved over 75 years.

During the ‘Amrit kal’, the intervening 25 years to the centennial, this transgression by the judiciary has to change in New India.

At one point of time, Honourable Lordships were trigger happy to sit on judgment as to whether a girl or woman can avail menstrual leave not leaving it to states, governments or stakeholders to decide. Supreme Court made attempts to assign itself the task of appointing three commissioners to the Election Commission of India which is crass.

When the Covid-19 pandemic was at its peak in 2021, Supreme Court and High Courts expected the Central Government and states to report on ‘virtual day to day basis,’ as to who were getting vaccinated and who were not. Latest is the Supreme Court taking upon itself to decide on the legality of same-sex marriages. Should this key socio, cultural, religious, dharmic and economic issue be left to courts?

Erroneously, Article 21 and 19 (1) (a) of Constitution of India were invoked citing right to expression and dignity of those that favored same sex marriages. There seems to have been temporary loss of memory that application of Section 377, Indian Penal Code was turned unconstitutional.

And, thereby dignity and expression of homosexuality or lesbianism was restored giving men and women their right to sexual preferences in relationships. These relationships have been decriminalized My Lordships!

Should courts be allowed to decide how one lives or marries? Do courts have the mandate to tamper with the institution of marriages in India that is not limited to just two individuals of opposite sex but the families and society at large?

On the other hand, power to legislate on a delicate issue like marriages is definitely in the domain of the Government, Parliament, elected policymakers and definitely not with judges that do not support openness in their own appointments. Otherwise, there’s no reason why National Judicial Appointments Commission bill of 2014 was vetoed.

Incidentally, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has rightly pointed out that marriages and related rituals were very sacred and sacrosanct in Hindu way of life that largely define and provide a distinct face to Indian society.

There’s awareness among stakeholders on the deep divide and complexity in accepting same-sex marriages. In majority countries globally, same-sex marriages have not been legalized even if such relationships have been. In fact, in the Indian context decriminalizing same sex relationships in 2018 was humane in approach.

In this backdrop, referring the same-sex marriages to a five-judge bench invoking Section 145 (3) of Indian Constitution needs closer scrutiny by stakeholders.

Instead of making desperate attempts to hog headlines day after day, courts and honorable judicial officers should put their own house in order. Administering justice to the common man or woman should take primacy in the way our judicial institutions function and not the urge to hog headlines the next day, come what may.

Reform in the judicial system should be top priority of this elite club of judges that seek to run affairs of the country from precincts of their chambers.

Phasing out adhocism, bringing in accountability, removing corruption and lobbying in courts that normally goes unreported or under-reported should be the primacy of the Chief Justice of India who leads a pack of wise men and women.

Administering justice in time is an issue that’s time and again flagged by several commentators including some top judicial minds. Over 4.9 crore out of five crore cases are pending in district courts across the country without respite to the commoners as per figures quoted by law minister Kiran Rijiju.

As per the National Judicial Data Grid, over 93 crore cases were pending in subordinate courts, 49 lakh cases in High Courts and 57,987 cases in Supreme Court as of December 2022. Instead of restricting itself to constitutional issues, Supreme Court turning itself into regular court of appeals may be just one reason.

More than that, the top court unwilling to play its role in reforming the system is the second reason. Thirdly, indulging in issues that may or may not be of its concern like the ‘same sex marriages’ could be yet another possible reason.

During ten years of policy paralysis of the United Progressive Alliance regime of 2004-13, judicial overreach got into high gear. Fledgling era of coalition governments and dirty political bickering etched out ground for judicial mis-adventurism by extension too.

Higher Judiciary should take the first step towards making courts and related institutions relevant to 1.4 billion Indian people.

Topics: same-sex marriageslaw minister Kiran RijijuNational Judicial Data GridConstitution of IndiaChief Justice Dhananjaya Y ChandrachudElection Commission of IndiaIndian Penal Codechief justice of indiaAmrit kalRecognising Same-sex relationsSupreme Court and High CourtsArticle 21 and 19 (1) (a)
ShareTweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

Karnataka: Event management company in Tumkur forces Hindu girls to wear Hijab and remove Kumkum

Next News

Nepal: Newly-elected Vice President Ram Sahaya Prasad Yadav is scheduled to take oath tomorrow

Related News

A representative image

Bihar: ECI voter revision drive to continue; SC asks commission to consider Aadhaar, ration cards as ID proof

A representative image: courtesy NDTV

Amid electoral roll revision in Bihar, ECI reaffirms commitment to universal adult suffrage

Protest by workers of the Congress party in Bihar: Image courtesy INDIA TV

Bihar voter list revision: Amid smooth progress of ‘SIR’ drive, grand alliance parties held statewide protest

Bihar SIR Progress: ECI reports strong response, set to meet July 25 deadline

Bihar SIR form collection touches nearly half-way mark in 14 days; 17 more days to go: ECI

Priyank Kharge & RSS: Egalitarian Ambedkar or Authoritarian Indira

Bihar Assembly Elections | Special Intensive Revision of Voters List – Constitutional Provisions and Significance

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Surrendered Maoists with officials in Narayanpur (ANI photo)

Chhattisgarh: Maoists surrender continues in Bastar as 22 more announced their return to mainstream in Narayanpur

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

Swarajya Symbols Immortalised: 12 forts of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj added in UNESCO world heritage list

Air India Crash: Preliminary Report Reveals Mysterious Engine Shutdown

Air India Crash: Report finds no evidence of sabotage, focus on mysterious engine shutdown — All you need to know

Representative image

Ahmedabad Air India Crash: Fuel control switch error caused engine failure, says AAIB preliminary investigation report

Representative Image

UGC Anti-Ragging Guidelines: Strict punishments to ensure safe and inclusive campuses

Digital India Foundation flags security threat over Pakistan bid to join global AI Alliance Network (AIANET)

Digital India Foundation flags security threat over Pakistan bid to join global AI Alliance Network (AIANET)

National Security Adviser Ajit Doval attends the 62nd Convocation of IIT Madras

Tamil Nadu: Ajit Doval rips into foreign media over Operation Sindoor narrative

Andhra Pradesh: Kamalananda Bharati Swamiji set to commence padayatra to strengthen dharmic and temple centric society

Shubhranshu Singh joins Inaugural Board of Effie LIONS Foundation, to represent India and South Asia

Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha

J&K: LG Manoj Sinha lashes out at those spreading false, misleading narratives similar to that of terror organisations

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies