Recognising Same-sex relations as marriage: Need open debate for legislation; Judiciary has no role to play
March 27, 2023
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • More
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • My States
    • Vocal4Local
    • Business
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
SUBSCRIBE
No Result
View All Result
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • More
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • My States
    • Vocal4Local
    • Business
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • RSS in News
  • My States
  • Vocal4Local
  • Subscribe
Home Bharat

Recognising Same-sex relations as marriage: Need open debate for legislation; Judiciary has no role to play

This is not the first time courts have gone on overdrive with judicial overreach. The Supreme Court’s stand on legalising same-sex marriages is yet another example of its bid to trample on the powers of the executive and Parliament

Adv Karan Thakur by Adv Karan Thakur
Mar 19, 2023, 06:10 pm IST
in Bharat
Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterTelegramEmail
https://organiser.org/wp-content/uploads/speaker/post-165483.mp3?cb=1679288284.mp3

While the demarcation of powers between the three is clear, repeated bid by the courts to stamp on someone else’s toe is making things worse for an already chaotic but working democratic setup that India has evolved over 75 years.

During the ‘Amrit kal’, the intervening 25 years to the centennial, this transgression by the judiciary has to change in New India.

At one point of time, Honourable Lordships were trigger happy to sit on judgment as to whether a girl or woman can avail menstrual leave not leaving it to states, governments or stakeholders to decide. Supreme Court made attempts to assign itself the task of appointing three commissioners to the Election Commission of India which is crass.

When the Covid-19 pandemic was at its peak in 2021, Supreme Court and High Courts expected the Central Government and states to report on ‘virtual day to day basis,’ as to who were getting vaccinated and who were not. Latest is the Supreme Court taking upon itself to decide on the legality of same-sex marriages. Should this key socio, cultural, religious, dharmic and economic issue be left to courts?

Erroneously, Article 21 and 19 (1) (a) of Constitution of India were invoked citing right to expression and dignity of those that favored same sex marriages. There seems to have been temporary loss of memory that application of Section 377, Indian Penal Code was turned unconstitutional.

And, thereby dignity and expression of homosexuality or lesbianism was restored giving men and women their right to sexual preferences in relationships. These relationships have been decriminalized My Lordships!

Should courts be allowed to decide how one lives or marries? Do courts have the mandate to tamper with the institution of marriages in India that is not limited to just two individuals of opposite sex but the families and society at large?

On the other hand, power to legislate on a delicate issue like marriages is definitely in the domain of the Government, Parliament, elected policymakers and definitely not with judges that do not support openness in their own appointments. Otherwise, there’s no reason why National Judicial Appointments Commission bill of 2014 was vetoed.

Incidentally, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has rightly pointed out that marriages and related rituals were very sacred and sacrosanct in Hindu way of life that largely define and provide a distinct face to Indian society.

There’s awareness among stakeholders on the deep divide and complexity in accepting same-sex marriages. In majority countries globally, same-sex marriages have not been legalized even if such relationships have been. In fact, in the Indian context decriminalizing same sex relationships in 2018 was humane in approach.

In this backdrop, referring the same-sex marriages to a five-judge bench invoking Section 145 (3) of Indian Constitution needs closer scrutiny by stakeholders.

Instead of making desperate attempts to hog headlines day after day, courts and honorable judicial officers should put their own house in order. Administering justice to the common man or woman should take primacy in the way our judicial institutions function and not the urge to hog headlines the next day, come what may.

Reform in the judicial system should be top priority of this elite club of judges that seek to run affairs of the country from precincts of their chambers.

Phasing out adhocism, bringing in accountability, removing corruption and lobbying in courts that normally goes unreported or under-reported should be the primacy of the Chief Justice of India who leads a pack of wise men and women.

Administering justice in time is an issue that’s time and again flagged by several commentators including some top judicial minds. Over 4.9 crore out of five crore cases are pending in district courts across the country without respite to the commoners as per figures quoted by law minister Kiran Rijiju.

As per the National Judicial Data Grid, over 93 crore cases were pending in subordinate courts, 49 lakh cases in High Courts and 57,987 cases in Supreme Court as of December 2022. Instead of restricting itself to constitutional issues, Supreme Court turning itself into regular court of appeals may be just one reason.

More than that, the top court unwilling to play its role in reforming the system is the second reason. Thirdly, indulging in issues that may or may not be of its concern like the ‘same sex marriages’ could be yet another possible reason.

During ten years of policy paralysis of the United Progressive Alliance regime of 2004-13, judicial overreach got into high gear. Fledgling era of coalition governments and dirty political bickering etched out ground for judicial mis-adventurism by extension too.

Higher Judiciary should take the first step towards making courts and related institutions relevant to 1.4 billion Indian people.

Topics: Supreme Court and High CourtsArticle 21 and 19 (1) (a)same-sex marriageslaw minister Kiran RijijuNational Judicial Data GridConstitution of IndiaChief Justice Dhananjaya Y ChandrachudElection Commission of IndiaIndian Penal Codechief justice of indiaAmrit kalRecognising Same-sex relations
ShareTweetSendShareSend
Previous News

Karnataka: Event management company in Tumkur forces Hindu girls to wear Hijab and remove Kumkum

Next News

Nepal: Newly-elected Vice President Ram Sahaya Prasad Yadav is scheduled to take oath tomorrow

Related News

Nagaland Assembly Elections:  BJP chief Temjen Imna Along wins from Alongtaki seat with 62.5 per cent votes

Nagaland Assembly Elections: BJP chief Temjen Imna Along wins from Alongtaki seat with 62.5 per cent votes

J&K: Madrasa Maulvi and his accomplice arrested for kidnapping and holding a minor girl hostage for five months

J&K: Madrasa Maulvi and his accomplice arrested for kidnapping and holding a minor girl hostage for five months

EVM Row: Congress questions efficacy of EVM at 85th Plenary Session, MP Karti Chidambaram deviates from official stance

EVM Row: Congress questions efficacy of EVM at 85th Plenary Session, MP Karti Chidambaram deviates from official stance

Supreme Court gives 3 weeks to Union Govt and ECI to respond to PIL seeking criminal candidates contesting polls

Supreme Court gives 3 weeks to Union Govt and ECI to respond to PIL seeking criminal candidates contesting polls

Meghalaya Assembly Elections: EC orders sealing of Meghalaya’s border with Bangladesh and Assam till March 2

Meghalaya Assembly Elections: EC orders sealing of Meghalaya’s border with Bangladesh and Assam till March 2

“Accept it and take a new symbol”: Uddhav’s ally Sharad Pawar on ‘bow and arrow’ loss

“Accept it and take a new symbol”: Uddhav’s ally Sharad Pawar on ‘bow and arrow’ loss

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

China and the West hostility: Sensationalising battle lines in the international arena

China and the West hostility: Sensationalising battle lines in the international arena

US Banking Crisis: Is the worst yet to come?

US Banking Crisis: Is the worst yet to come?

World Boxing Championships 2023: Nikhat Zareen wins her 2nd Gold medal

World Boxing Championships 2023: Nikhat Zareen wins her 2nd Gold medal

Hindu Rashtra: Rashtra is Hindu and Sanatan Its Adjective

Hindu Rashtra: Rashtra is Hindu and Sanatan Its Adjective

Umesh Pal Murder: Atiq Ahmed to be shifted from Sabarmati jail to Prayagraj; To be produced in MP MLA court on March 28

Umesh Pal Murder: Atiq Ahmed to be shifted from Sabarmati jail to Prayagraj; To be produced in MP MLA court on March 28

Madhya Pradesh: Alcohol & condoms found from principal’s office at a missionary school; Repeated cases of conversion & sexual abuse at such schools raise alarming questions

Madhya Pradesh: Alcohol & condoms found from principal’s office at a missionary school; Repeated cases of conversion & sexual abuse at such schools raise alarming questions

Assam: Massive rally over the issue of anti-conversion and delisting of ST status organised by JDSSM, more than 55000 tribals participated

Assam: Massive rally over the issue of anti-conversion and delisting of ST status organised by JDSSM, more than 55000 tribals participated

Bihar: Row over ‘Hindu Rashtra’ banners in Darbhanga, VHP slams Nitish-Tejashwi Government for lodging FIR

Hindu Rashtra Flags: Bihar police arrested VHP district secretary after flags appeared in Darbhanga

Land For Job Scam: Tejashwi Yadav finally presented before the CBI

Land For Job Scam: Tejashwi Yadav finally presented before the CBI

Demographic Shift of Europe: Spain witnessed 10 times increase in Muslim Population in last 3 decades

Demographic Shift of Europe: Spain witnessed 10 times increase in Muslim Population in last 3 decades

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • My States
  • Vocal4Local
  • Special Report
  • Sci & Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Books
  • Interviews
  • Travel
  • Health
  • Obituary
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Refund and Cancellation

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies