Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee Death Anniversary - Unsung stalwart
October 14, 2026
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • World Hindu Congress 2026
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Copy
    • Subscribe & Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • World Hindu Congress 2026
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Copy
    • Subscribe & Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee Death Anniversary – The suscipicious death of an Unsung stalwart which was not enquired

Seventy-one years ago, on June 23, 1953, Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee, a towering figure in independent India's political landscape, tragically passed away at the age of 52 while in detention in Jammu & Kashmir

Raghvendra SinghRaghvendra Singh
Jun 23, 2025, 09:00 am IST
inBharat, Jammu and Kashmir, West Bengal
Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee (File Image)

Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee (File Image)

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsAppTelegramEmail

He tragically passed away in the early hours of June 23, 1953. He was just 52. A member of Lok Sabha, part of independent India’s first cabinet and a prominent opposition leader thereafter, he had been detained without any trial by the J&K government in May 1953. He was also the founder of Bharatiya Jan Sangh that later transformed into Bharatiya Janata Party, the current ruling dispensation in India.

It was in Geneva that Nehru learnt of Syama Babu’s death. The grief stricken mother of Syama Babu, Jogmaya Devi, wrote a letter to Nehru: “My son died in detention, detention without trial … you say you had visited Kashmir during my son’s detention. You speak of the affection you had for him. But what prevented you, I wonder, from meeting him there personally and satisfying yourself about his health and arrangements? … ever since his detention there, the first information that I, his mother, received from the Government of Jammu and Kashmir was that my son was no more … and in what cruel cryptic way the message was conveyed.” Further communication between Jogmaya Devi and Nehru makes for a very sad reading. Even the President of West Bengal Congress Committee, Atulya Ghosh felt that “it was amazing that no intimation was sent to his family members nor to his physician, B.C. Roy … the Kashmir Government appears to be callous … the way the news was conveyed to the house of Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee was highly objectionable.”

Read More: Operation Midnight Hammer: US confirms largest B-2 strike on Iranian nuclear sites

Though Syama Babu passed away on  June 23, 1953, it was only on November 27, 1953, that a resolution was passed in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly to hold an inquiry into the causes and circumstances of his death. Gyanendra Kumar Chaudhary moved this resolution asking for the State Government to request the Central Government to hold an inquiry through a Commission with a judge of the Supreme Court of India as its Chairman. Another Assembly member from the Congress Party, Shankar Prasad Mitra, moved an amendment to the resolution seeking that the words “for holding an inquiry”, be substituted with “for requesting the Government of Jammu and Kashmir to hold an inquiry”. He also sought that the words “by appointing a Commission with the Judge of the Supreme Court of India to serve as Chairman of the Commission”, be omitted.

He emphasised that J&K enjoyed a special status. The executive powers of the Government of India extended to J&K only in respect of defence, external affairs and communication. The Government of India was therefore ‘incompetent’ to appoint a Commission of Inquiry which would function primarily within J&K. Government of India could only request or recommend to J&K that a Commission of Inquiry be appointed.

There were others like Sudhir Chandra Ray Choudhuri in the Legislative Assembly who actively opposed the amendment. Ray Choudhuri wondered why Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy, Chief Minister of West Bengal, had first thought an inquiry to be necessary and later declined it. He wanted to know the reason of this sudden change of heart. Syama Babu, after all, had been a great friend of Bidhan Babu. “Why should there be no move from the Chief Minister to induce the Government of India to hold an inquiry?”, he asked. He felt that the amendment would sidetrack the main issue. What was being asked for was an inquiry by the judge of a Supreme Court, a judge who could take cognizance of evidence anywhere, including J&K. In this particular instance, the J&K Government was the accused party. How could it then sit in judgment over this inquiry? Ray Choudhuri appealed to Bidhan Chandra Roy for an impartial inquiry by the Central Government.

Strangely, it was the members of the Congress Party who had argued in favour of the amendment. Even Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy said that, “barring the items like defence, external affairs and communication, the executive powers of the Government of India does not extend to J&K. Having recourse to the terms of the Constitution, there is no other alternative but to accept the amendment moved by Shri Shankar Prasad Mishra.” The Congress sought acceptance of the amendment and succeeded.

A resolution passed by the Assembly in West Bengal was forwarded to the Ministry of States in the section dealing with J&K. The Ministry of States acknowledged its receipt on 26th February 1954. The matter rested thereafter till the proceedings of the entire debate on the resolution was forwarded by West Bengal Government to the Ministry of States on 28th August 1954. The observation from the relevant files of the Ministry of States is as under:

“It is for consideration whether we may inform the Government of West Bengal that as the matter primarily concerns the Government of J&K, the Government of India did not consider it proper to pursue it. When the request for an inquiry into the circumstances of Syama Prasad Mukherjee’s death was raised in parliament, the attitude which he adopted was that this was a matter which concerned the Government of J&K alone. The resolution passed by the West Bengal Legislative Assembly is consistent with this stand since it only asks the Government of India to pass on the request to the J&K Government. We have now two course open. We may either send the copy of the resolution and proceedings to J&K Government for such action as they may consider necessary, or we may return the proceedings to the West Bengal Government and ask them to address the J&K Government directly. While the latter course may be strictly a correct one, it would have the effect of rebuff to the Government of West Bengal where Dr. Mukherjee’s death has agitated the public mind very much. There may, therefore, be no harm if we adopt the first alternative. I do not think this was likely to give rise to any misunderstanding with the J&K Government.”  K.N.V. Nambisan from the Ministry of States signed this note on 7th September 1954. The first course was agreed upon by both, the Secretary and the Minister. On 22nd September, the Ministry of States forwarded the resolution to the Chief Secretary of J&K for such action as considered necessary. Nothing came out of this routine letter sent by the Ministry of States to the Government of J&K. No inquiry ensued.

In a starred parliamentary question, the Ministry of Home Affairs was asked to state whether the Chief Minister of West Bengal had visited J&K in June 1954 to enquire into the cause of Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee’s death. Also, whether the Chief Minister of West Bengal had submitted any report on this subject. The Speaker in the Lok Sabha was now to decide on the admissibility of the question. The Ministry of States asked the Chief Secretary of J&K about the reported visit of Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy. Later, the Ministry of States reverted to the Lok Sabha Secretariat that they had no information on this matter except for what had appeared in the newspaper about the stay of Dr. B.C. Roy in J&K. The letter further stated that the circumstances relating to the death of Syama Prasad Mukherjee in detention concerned J&K Government and not the Government of India and that the present question was outside the purview of the Government and therefore the question should not be admitted. The Printed List No. 21 of July 26, 1954 of Lok Sabha clearly displayed the starred question amongst the one which was disallowed.

On August 5, 1954, Ghulam Ahmed, Chief Secretary J&K, wrote to V. Narayanan, Joint Secretary in the Ministry of States, stating, “as you know Dr. B.C. Roy did come to Kashmir for a holiday and spent about a month here. He did see the bungalow where late Dr. Mukherjee was putting up, as well as the room in the hospital to which he had been removed prior to his death. Col. Sir Ram Nath Chopra, our Director, Health Services, took Dr. Roy to the hospital where he might have made some verbal inquiries on the spot. You will, therefore, see that no official inquiry was held by the doctor, and as such no report could have been submitted by him.”

Astonishingly, all three governments, of West Bengal, J&K and the Government of India had remained callously and deliberately indifferent in instituting a formal inquiry into the circumstances leading to the premature death of Dr. Syama Prasad Mukherjee, one of India’s tallest leaders.

(The author is a former Culture Secretary, Government of India and currently Sr Fellow at Vivekananda International Foundation,  New Delhi.)

Topics: Bharatiya Jan SanghaJammu & KashmirJ&KAbrogation of Article 370Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee Death Anniversary
Share
Tweet
SendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

Tamil Nadu: Murugan Devotees Conference draws over 4 lakh Hindus; asserting cultural awakening and assertiveness

Next News

Syria Church Attack: Islamic State suicide bomber kills 22 Christians, injures 63 in Damascus

Related News

NIA attaches LeT-linked property in Srinagar

J&K: NIA attaches Srinagar property linked to LeT terrorists; Probe exposes OGWs aid to Pakistani terror network

India issued a sharp warning to Pakistan & asserted that it will not bow to nuclear blackmail

India slams Pakistan at UN: ‘Will not bow to nuclear blackmail’; Warns against using nukes as instruments of statecraft

Representative Image

J&K: 150 Bangladeshi nationals deported during verification drive; Illegal migrants handed over to BSF in Bagdogra

Pakistani LeT militant linked to Pahalgam Attack, Hashim Moosa killed in Budgam encounter | Operation Korag

India slams Pakistan at UNGA

India slams Pakistan’s “hypocritical homily”; Exposes Shehbaz Sharif as puppet of the Army; Reaffirms J&K sovereignty

Indian diplomat Kshitij Tyagi slams Pakistan at UNHRC

India Slams Pakistan at UNHRC: Theatrics can’t hide economic crisis & repay loans; Exposes terrorism & minority abuse

Load More

Latest News

Parvinder Singh Jhota Killing: Main Shooter Arrested; Mother Blames CM Bhagwant Mann Over Law & Order

Killing of anti-drug activist Parvinder: Main accused arrested; NHRC seeks report, mother blames CM Mann for killing

I am an ardent Modi Bhakta and will remain in BJP until my last breath,” says BJP State Vice-President R Sreelekha

Flames engulf a Saudi Aramco oil facility south of Riyadh on October 3, following an earlier Houthi attack on the kingdom’s oil infrastructure

West Asia conflict deepens as Shia Houthis fire missile at Saudi Aramco after Saudi strike on oil site in Yemen

UPI Payments in India (A representative image)

MDR on UPI transactions till Rs 2000 postponed; Govt’s digital payments push remains focused on accessibility

Fact Check: Old 2017 footage falsely linked to the Delhi protests.

Fact Check: Did army personnel thrash students during Delhi protests? Viral video is false

French supermarkets face disruption as hacked fridges hit major retail brands, spoil food and expose the risks of insecure connected systems

France: Cyberattack hits fridges in 500 supermarkets, leaves tons of food spoiled and affects US-European tech firms

Rajasthan Panel Seeks Probe Into Assault on RSS Pracharak

Rajasthan Human Rights panel sought report on assault of RSS Pracharak at Jaipur police station

Dr APJ Abdul Kalam with the students

Dr APJ Abdul Kalam Birth Anniversary: The newspaper boy of Rameswaram — have we repaid the debt of his dreams?

BJP women MPs met President Droupadi Murmu, demanding action against Congress MP Bimol Akoijam

JNU Sexual Harassment Case: BJP Women MPs meet President Murmu, demand action against Congress MP Angomcha Akoijam

IIT Bombay Student Sahil Wakode Admitted Exam Mistake, Sought Another Chance in Written Statement; No Prior Caste Complaint Recorded by Institute

IIT Bombay student Sahil Wakode admitted exam cheating, sought another chance; No caste angle found in initial records

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies