While Bharat takes immense pride in being the world’s largest democracy, Tamil Nadu’s campuses have long functioned as controlled labs of silence, not platforms of freedom. In this southern state that boasts a supposedly progressive ethos, campus democracy is less of a living principle and more of a taxidermied trophy mounted on the wall of Dravidian hypocrisy.
“The latest chapter in this political farce is Chief Minister M. K. Stalin eyeing the role of Chancellor for all state universities. Because nothing says ‘academic freedom’ like having the ruling party’s patriarch sitting atop every university’s decision-making ladder.”
Who asked for this ‘next level’ democracy? – The Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court, in State of Tamil Nadu vs. Governor of Tamil Nadu (W.P. (C) No. 1239 of 2023), ruled that the Governor cannot withhold assent once a Bill is re-passed by the State Assembly. A win for constitutional clarity, yes, but let’s not pop the champagne yet. Because while the Court held the Governor accountable, it accidentally lifted the veil on a more sinister
Reality: the Dravidian model’s slow suffocation of academic autonomy.
Tamil Nadu had passed 12 Bills, 10 of which concerned university governance, essentially moving the power to appoint Vice-Chancellors from the Governor to the elected government. The Governor stalled, and the State cried foul. However, when you examine the motive behind these bills, what emerges is not decentralisation but a carefully coded power grab.
If it’s governance, it’s Stalin ka parivaar. If it’s education, it’s also Stalin ka parivaar!
The DMK dressed it up as state autonomy. In reality, it’s party centralisation. If passed, the CM becomes the ultimate academic boss, M K Stalin, the new Chancellor of all universities. Not metaphorically. Literally.
We’re now staring down a system where one political party (and, more importantly, one family) gets to handpick who runs the intellectual life of the state. Forget checks and balances. This is checks cancelled, balances deleted.
DMK ensures delay of justice: Anna University and the Anatomy of Abuse
If you think this is hyperbole, look at the Gnanasekaran case. A DMK loyalist and known history-sheeter accused of sexually harassing a student inside Anna University. Police delays. Political silence. Institutional apathy.
Now imagine such figures being protected not just unofficially but structurally because their political patrons are also their academic bosses. That’s not just corruption of governance; it’s the poisoning of education itself.
It’s enough if the CM knows-public doesn’t need to!
Here’s what real campus democracy looks like:
-Independent student unions
-Transparent appointments
-Space for dissent
-Safety and justice for victims
-Decisions made through dialogue, not decree
Guess what the DMK government offers? None of the above. Instead, it hands universities over to the Chief Minister’s office, fully wrapped in a gift ribbon labelled “reform.”
TN Student Politics, RIP
Irony is bleeding in black ink: the DMK, a party once born from campus agitation, has become the very machinery that crushes student expression. Decades ago, leaders like K. Anbazhagan & Duraimurugan emerged from student activism. Today, Udhayanidhi Stalin ascends not through debate halls but through bloodlines.
No student unions. No campus elections. No dissent. No debate. Just state-sponsored sedation. The Dravidian model of higher education seems to believe that silent students make obedient citizens and, perhaps, more pliable voters.
In contrast, JNU and DU produce real national leaders. Like Arun Jaitley, Ravi Shankar Prasad, and Venkaiah Naidu, to name a few. Student activism in Telangana played a crucial role in the statehood movement. Even in Bihar, student leaders shape political discourse.
Tamil Nadu? Nothing. A self-induced coma. Not cultural. Not accidental. Politically engineered.
Is it a people’s party or a monarchy’s party?– A Legacy of Control
In public speeches, the DMK thumps its chest for federalism. But in private, it architects a fortress of control. The shift from Governor to CM is not about justice or efficiency but, it’s about empire-building. The empire of one man, one party, one family, one voice.
Let’s be clear: the Supreme Court did what it had to. But courts can’t revive student unions. Courts can’t run university elections. Courts can’t teach courage.
That job? It’s ours. The nationalists. The thinkers. The doers. The youth.
“Campus-um Kedaichudhu, Kalvi-um Kettudhu!” (Campus got hijacked, education got ruined!)
Campus democracy in Tamil Nadu is not dying of natural causes. It’s being euthanised needle by needle by a political culture that thrives on control and fears dissent. If we don’t act now, we’re not just losing student voices, we’re losing the very soul of our future leadership.
This isn’t just about who appoints Vice-Chancellors. It’s about who gets to ask questions in the first place. And if students can’t ask questions, then we’re not running universities. We’re running training camps for silence.
Comments