In the guise of humanity, the left-wing ecosystem, which includes Deep State forces and part of USAID, has been destroying the political systems and cultures of many nations for selfish reasons and the desire to govern the world as they see fit. Many anti-India protests, such as Shahin Bag, Kisan Andolan, Bangladesh Hindu Genocide, Kashmir genocide, Mumbai terrorist attack, Maoism and terrorism activities, urban naxals’ anti-India narratives, all point to funding by the left ecosystem, one of which is USAID. Donald Trump and Elon Musk saw the risk to civilization and shut down USAID. The Trump administration’s recent steps to halt foreign aid and close the key agency in charge of its distribution have focused attention on a relatively minor but long-standing source of controversy in federal spending. The moves have caused ambiguity among humanitarian organizations and governments around the world about which programs may and cannot continue. Many humanitarian assists, such as health, education, cleanliness, and water, must be continued, and President Donald Trump will undoubtedly begin these aids after removing anti-humanitarian leftist groups.
How are USAID funding being exploited for anti-humanitarian operations in India and other developing and underdeveloped nations? Few examples
USAID, which is under fire from US President Donald Trump, receives more than half of all American international spending. Despite red signs, USAID funded the Pakistan-based Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation (FIF), a front for Hafiz Saeed’s Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). Despite the fact that the US government has banned the FIF and LeT, they have received funding from USAID. The Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation (FIF) and the LeT were responsible for the 26/11 assaults in Mumbai, which killed 166 people. Six Americans were among the 166 persons brutally killed by Pakistani militants. What’s more startling is that, despite being investigated for sponsoring an Islamist charity with links to terrorist organisations, USAID continued to release monies to it. The USAID money to FIF was routed through Helping Hand for Relief and Development (HHRD), a Muslim nonprofit established in Michigan with ties to terrorist groups operating in South Asia.
Trump has labeled USAID a “deep state” while cracking down on it. In a post on X, an account linked to Trump claimed that “George Soros received $260,000,000.00 from USAID and used this money to spread chaos, change governments, and personal gain in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Ukraine, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, India, the UK, and the US.” His remarks add to the growing scrutiny of US foreign aid, especially since Trump’s administration has frozen USAID’s budget. Elon Musk, CEO of DOGE, has backed Trump’s government in emphasising USAID’s financial assistance for what they describe “woke and controversial” programs. Musk’s engagement has heightened Republican concerns about foreign aid being utilized for regime change and political influence.
Musk stated in an X Spaces conversation that he “went over” the “USAID stuff” with Trump and “[the president] agreed that we should shut it down,” after Trump told reporters about USAID, “It’s been run by a bunch of radical lunatics, and we’re getting them out, and then we’ll make a decision [about its future].”
Nishikant Dubey, BJP MP, stated that USAID-funded NGOs protested the government’s Agniveer project, promoted caste censuses, and supported Maoism in the country. According to a news report, Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros’ groups received $260 million from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) to influence political affairs and destabilise various countries, including India and Bangladesh.
American foreign aid has traditionally been focused on political power rather than development. USAID-funded programs have repeatedly driven recipient countries to embrace US-friendly policies, execute market reforms that favor American firms, and act as strategic bases for military dominance. The aid itself sometimes prioritizes short-term remedies above creating true self-reliance, trapping many developing countries in cycles of dependency rather than economic empowerment. Despite these weaknesses, USAID has been an important tool of US soft power.
See, USAID doesn’t just write a check for a cause and walk away. It employs a combination of state personnel, contract labor, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) on the ground. Some of them work as full-time workers, but without the federal privileges. And they vastly outnumber the permanent civil service professionals and foreign service officers who typically work for a US government agency. In the Syria example, USAID provided funds to feed refugees. However, over four years, an NGO agent took up around 10% of it and diverted it to an al-Qaeda-linked outfit.
How much does the federal government spend on foreign aid?
According to the Congressional Budget Office’s January 2025 predictions, the government is on track to spend around $58.4 billion on international assistance programs in fiscal year 2025. But, with barely four months into the fiscal year with the Trump administration aggressively reshaping and reducing aid, that figure might change. According to ForeignAssistance.gov, the United States government spent $71.9 billion on international aid in fiscal 2023, the most recent fiscal year for which data is substantially complete. This compared to roughly $74.0 billion spent in fiscal 2022. These data (and others from ForeignAssistance.gov) exclude the majority of arms sales and military equipment transfers to other countries.
The amount, recipients, and purposes of foreign aid change year to year, based on changing conditions (such as wars, disasters, or disease outbreaks) and shifting national goals. For example, U.S. foreign aid spending was significantly smaller in fiscal 2001: $24.6 billion in inflation-adjusted 2023 dollars. However, by federal fiscal criteria, annual aid spending in recent years has not varied significantly. Between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2023, yearly aid spending fluctuated between $52.9 billion and $77.3 billion, adjusted for inflation. According to the UN, the US government is the world’s single-largest aid giver, accounting for more over 40 per cent of all humanitarian aid tracked in 2024.
How big is foreign aid as a share of the entire federal budget?
The government spent $71.9 billion on foreign aid in fiscal 2023, accounting for 1.2 per cent of total federal outlays of more than $6.1 trillion. A line chart demonstrating that foreign aid spending is a modest but contentious component of the US federal budget. Since fiscal 2001, foreign aid has accounted for 0.7 per cent to 1.4 per cent of overall federal spending. For comparison, the government deficit – the difference between receipts and expenditures that must be covered by borrowing – was nearly $1.7 trillion in fiscal 2023. Foreign aid accounted for a larger share of federal spending during the Cold War. In fact, the present aid system was largely shaped by the rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union.
What is US foreign aid money used for?
US foreign assistance funds a wide range of humanitarian, economic development, and democracy-building projects, however the categories can be ambiguous and the distinctions between them murky. For example, the largest activity area in fiscal 2023, at $15.9 billion or 22.1 per cent of all granted aid, was “macroeconomic foundation for growth.” That may appear to be all for economic development, but $14.4 billion of that amount was spent directly to support the Ukrainian government in its war with Russia.
The puppets of the leftist ecosystem in India, comprising certain dynastic political parties, numerous NGOs, urban naxals, self-proclaimed intellectuals, and few media figures, are being starkly revealed for their connections to anti-humanity and divisive forces, as well as their efforts to undermine the nation and its culture for personal profit and substantial funding.
