In the ever-evolving landscape of Delhi’s education system, the persistent issue of trust deficit has been a focal point of concern between the Delhi government and 12 distinctive colleges. The ongoing challenges have shed light on this matter and have increased the trust gap. The issue has prompted the stakeholders to look out for other solutions for collaborative and effective bonding.
It has been said that the 12 colleges fully funded by the Delhi government have been “misusing funds” concerning the creation of teaching, and non-teaching positions, along with other appointments, without any prior approval from the Delhi government. As per the data, there are around 939 teaching posts and 958 non-teaching posts currently that are considered illegal. Since these posts are illegally created, all appointments done will be considered illegal.
One of the primary sources of this heated disagreement is related to allocation of resources and funds. The 12 colleges, renowned for their excellent academic background, persist in facing challenges because of inadequate support from the Delhi government. The 12 colleges argue that a more substantial allocation of funds is absolutely necessary to uphold their reputation as premier educational institutes and provide students with a competitive advantage. However, the Delhi government due to its own fiscal constraints, has been cautious about fulfilling these demands completely. This struggle has added a strain to the relationship between the 12 colleges and Delhi government.
Another significant source that has emerged as a contributor in this trust deficit is the Autonomy. The college administrators and leaders have said that due to excessive interference from the Delhi government has hampered their ability to swiftly adapt to ever-growing educational needs. They are focusing more on decentralization and academic freedom as this is essential to promote innovation and maintain a competitive edge for a larger picture.
In the contract, the government of Delhi believes more confidently that centralised control helps them maintain uniform standards across colleges and any sort of differences. Thus, to make a balance between autonomy and standardisation, it is important to have two way open communication and a mutual understanding between both the parties.
Cause of Trust Deficit
The trust deficit has widened because of lack of transparency in communication between the two, 12 colleges and the Delhi government. It is said that the decisions that affect the college are often made without any proper consultation from the stakeholders, which in turn, leaves them blindsided. Thus, lack of involvement in the decision making process has gradually destroyed the trust that should be the bedrock of this partnership.
To address the foreseen circumstances and bridge the trust deficit gap, efforts are underway. From both sides, the stakeholders have identified the urgent need for discussion and collaboration on the same matter. To bring together the representatives from 12 colleges and Delhi government, a setup has been organised. Hopefully, common ground can be found in the interaction.
Above all, rebuilding trust required a commitment from both sides. For this, both parties have to actively listen to each other and find a mutually agreed-upon solution. It is the duty of the 12 colleges to present their needs and concerns in such a manner to the Delhi government that they align with the broader educational goals. On the other hand, the government of Delhi should also be open to constructive feedback and willing to adapt to policies to serve the academic community.
The issue, no doubt, is multifaceted and requires careful consideration and efforts from both parties. But, beyond the major challenges, there is an open opportunity for the Delhi government and 12 colleges to rebuild and define their relationship for excellence in education. Bridging this trust deficit is not only important for the well-being of the institutes, but also for long term success.
Comments