Madras High Court sets aside the appointment of two non-Brahmin priests in Trichy’s Agamic temple
March 26, 2023
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • More
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • My States
    • Vocal4Local
    • Business
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
SUBSCRIBE
No Result
View All Result
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • More
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • My States
    • Vocal4Local
    • Business
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • RSS in News
  • My States
  • Vocal4Local
  • Subscribe
Home Bharat

Madras High Court sets aside the appointment of two non-Brahmin priests in Trichy’s Agamic temple

On February 3, Madras High Court set aside the appointment of two non-Brahmin priests of Arulmighu Subramaniya Swamy temple at Kumaravayalur of Srirangam taluk in Tiruchy, on the ground that they do not come under the denomination of ‘Adi Saivars’ or ‘Sivachariyars’ or ‘Gurukkals’

T S Venkatesan by T S Venkatesan
Mar 5, 2023, 06:00 pm IST
in Bharat, Tamil Nadu
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterTelegramEmail
https://organiser.org/wp-content/uploads/speaker/post-163845.mp3?cb=1678078846.mp3

Justice GR Swaminathan of Madurai bench Madras High Court on February 3, set aside the appointment of two non-Brahmin priests of Arulmighu Subramaniya Swamy temple at Kumaravayalur of Srirangam taluk in Trichy, on the ground that they do not come under the denomination of ‘Adi Saivars’ or ‘Sivachariyars’ or ‘Gurukkals’ and therefore are ineligible to be appointed in the agamic temple, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the fit person of the temple to consider appointing Brahmin priests K Karthick and S Parameswaran to the posts.

The court passed the order on the petitions filed by Karthick and Parameswaran challenging the appointment of the non-Brahmin priests S Prabhu and S Jayabalan.

The Tamil Nadu Government issued a GO, followed by an amendment in the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, to the effect that any person who is a Hindu and possesses requisite qualification and training can be appointed as Archaka in Hindu temples. But Justice Swaminathan noted that the Supreme Court, while hearing a petition filed by Sivacharyargal Nala Sangam in 2016, had opined that the said GO has the potential of falling foul of the dictum laid down by it in one of Seshammal’s case.

He pointed out, “In Seshammal’s case, the top court had held that “…failure to appoint ‘Archaka’ from a specified denomination, sect or group in accordance with the directions of the Agamas governing the temple, would not only be contrary to Section 28(1) of the HR and CE Act but also interferes with a religious practice,”.

However, the judge said that this does not amount to a breach of Article 17 (Abolition of Untouchability) of the Constitution of India as even Smartha Brahmin (a sect of Brahmins) are not eligible to be appointed as ‘Archaka’ as per the ‘Kamika Agama’, which governs the aforesaid temple. “A Smartha Brahmin cannot enter the sanctum-sanctorum. If persons belonging to the Scheduled Caste community alone have been disqualified, then such an agama will have to be ignored as unconstitutional. Such is not the case here. On the other hand, this is a question of upholding the fundamental rights of a denomination,” Justice Swaminathan observed.

Also noting that the petitioners, though not formally appointed, have been working as ‘Archakas’ in the temple for more than a decade, the judge said there is no justification for not considering their case. “Only Adi Saivars or Sivachariyars or Gurukkals, who have gained knowledge in the agamas, are eligible and qualified to be appointed as Archakas for the said temple.In hundreds of temples in Tamil Nadu, Archakas are performing their religious duties even without getting any salary. They were never appointed in the first place. These are matters of tradition, custom and usage”. The judge directed the trustee or fit person of the temple to consider and take a decision on appointing the petitioners as Archakas within two months.

Last August, a bench of chief justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari and justice N Mala said, “The appointment of Archakas (priests) in the temples constructed as per Agamas would be governed by the Agamas and for that, the Rule under challenge would not apply”. It cited Article 26 of the Constitution, which allows every religious denomination the right to establish, maintain and manage its own affairs in the manner provided in the religion.

The judges said Saivite temples were governed by 28 Agamas, with the most important of them being Kamikagama, Karanagama and Suprabedagama. Similarly, Vaishnavites also had their Agamas, with the principle among them being the Vikhanasa and Pancharatra. Therefore, the appointment of Archakas must be strictly based on such Agamas they ordered.

They gave this direction while disposing off a petition by the All India Adi Saiva Sivacharyargal Seva Sangam, which sought quashing of rules brought in by the state government, called the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Institutions Employees (Conditions of Service) Rules, 2020, regarding qualifications and appointment of temple priests.

The trouble started after the DMK Government came to power. Keeping its poll promise, the DMK Government has appointed trained aspirants from various castes as temple priests in Tamil Nadu in August 2021. Of the 208 appointees, CM MK Stalin handed over appointment orders from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment (HR & CE) Department on March 4 to 75 personnel who had completed ‘Archagar’ training.

Several Brahmin priests, it is alleged, were being evicted for the new appointees to begin work. A priest, in a video that went viral, is heard saying that priests from Kalahasti Temple and Kabaleeswarar Temple are being evicted with nowhere to go. Many viewed this is an attempt to tinker with the Hindu temple management practices with an ulterior motive of diluting it to weaker one so that Hindus would slowly lose interest and worshipping.

Topics: Adi SaivarsSivachariyarsGurukkalsArticle 17Abolition of UntouchabilityMadras High CourtCM MK StalinNon-Brahmin PriestsTiruchy’s Agamic TempleArulmighu Subramaniya Swamy templeJustice GR Swaminathan
ShareTweetSendShareSend
Previous News

Temple at Wadeshwar: Shiv Mandir With Ancient Design

Next News

Cyber Warfare: Is banning Chinese firms enough for India’s cyber security or Modi Government need to do more

Related News

Madras High Court directs Tamil Nadu police to permit RSS route march across the State

Madras High Court directs Tamil Nadu police to permit RSS route march across the State

“Muslim women should go to family court to get a divorce and not to Shariat bodies like Jamaats”: Madras High Court

“Muslim women should go to family court to get a divorce and not to Shariat bodies like Jamaats”: Madras High Court

Amidst calls for banning 'online rummy', Tamil Nadu Govt's textbook features lesson on playing rummy

Amidst calls for banning ‘online rummy’, Tamil Nadu Govt’s textbook features lesson on playing rummy

Tamil Nadu: Madras HC bans mobile phones inside temple premises

Tamil Nadu: Madras HC bans mobile phones inside temple premises

Rajiv Gandhi assassination: SC orders per-mature release of six convicts

Rajiv Gandhi assassination: SC orders per-mature release of six convicts

Coimbatore Blast: Terror of Cover-up  in ‘Stalin’-Grad

Coimbatore Blast: Terror of Cover-up in ‘Stalin’-Grad

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

ISRO launches India’s largest LVM3 rocket from Sriharikota

ISRO launches India’s largest LVM3 rocket from Sriharikota

Khalistani extremists abused a journalist outside Indian Embassy in Washington DC

Khalistani extremists abused a journalist outside Indian Embassy in Washington DC

Khalistan supporters threaten the Indian embassy in US

Khalistan supporters threaten the Indian embassy in US

52 years of the Bengali Hindu Genocide, still no recognition from the international community

52 years of the Bengali Hindu Genocide, still no recognition from the international community

Delisting: A way to deliver Justice

Delisting: A way to deliver Justice

Delisting: Need of Strong Constitutional Safeguards to protect the rights of Janjati community

Delisting: Need of Strong Constitutional Safeguards to protect the rights of Janjati community

Why demand for delisting growing among Tiwa society in Assam and North East

Why demand for delisting growing among Tiwa society in Assam and North East

Delisting is only solution to protect culture and identity of Janjati community

Delisting is only solution to protect culture and identity of Janjati community

Bageshwar Dham: Send two of your children to the service of Prabhu Ram, asked Pandit Dhirendra Krishna Shahstri

Bageshwar Dham: Furious Congress Government to register another case against Dhirendra Shashtri for his “Saffron Flag” remarks

Minor Hindu girls abducted by Imteyaz and accomplice recovered from Telangana; told Organiser that the accused wanted to have ‘conversion–Nikah’ with them

Minor Hindu girls abducted by Imteyaz and accomplice recovered from Telangana; told Organiser that the accused wanted to have ‘conversion–Nikah’ with them

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • My States
  • Vocal4Local
  • Special Report
  • Sci & Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Books
  • Interviews
  • Travel
  • Health
  • Obituary
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Refund and Cancellation

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies