Collegium discussions can't be put out in the public domain through RTI: Supreme Court
October 7, 2026
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • World Hindu Congress 2026
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • World Hindu Congress 2026
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Collegium discussions can’t be put out in the public domain through RTI: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking to uncover details under the Right to Information (RTI) of a collegium meeting in which decisions were taken about the elevation of judges to the apex court.

WEBDESKWEBDESK
Dec 10, 2022, 07:53 pm IST
inBharat
Follow on Google News
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsAppTelegramEmail

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking to uncover details under the Right to Information (RTI) of a collegium meeting in which decisions were taken about the elevation of judges to the apex court.

A bench headed by Justice M.R. Shah said, “Only a resolution drawn and signed by all the collegium members can be said to be the final decision…”

The bench added that “it is to be noted that final decision is taken by the collegium only after due consultation and during the consultation some decision takes place, but no final decision is taken and no resolution is drawn, it cannot be said that a final decision is taken by the collegium”.

“Collegium is a multi-member body whose decision embodies into the resolution that may be formally drawn up and signed…,” said the bench, adding that only the final decision needed to be uploaded on the Supreme Court’s website.

It further added that whatever was debated in the collegium was not required to be placed out in the public domain, that too under the RTI Act.

The top court judgment came on a petition by activist Anjali Bhardwaj against the Delhi High Court order, which dismissed her plea seeking the apex court collegium’s agenda in connection with a meeting held on December 12, 2018, when certain findings were purportedly taken on the elevation of some judges to the apex court.

On December 2, the Supreme Court, taking a dig at retired judges, said, “It has become a fashion for them to comment about earlier decisions taken by the collegium, and the existing collegium system should not be derailed on the basis of statements of some busybody”. The apex court highlighted that the collegium was the most transparent establishment.

The bench told that it did not want to make comment on what a few former apex court judges, who were once members of the Supreme Court Collegium, were now saying about the mechanism.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioner RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj, said Justice Madan Lokur, former apex court judge, who was part of the Supreme Court Collegium in 2018, had said that one of the decisions, should have been uploaded on the Supreme Court website.

The bench said, “Nowadays, it has become a fashion to comment upon earlier decisions (of the collegium) made when they (former judges) were part of the collegium”. It further added, “We don’t want to say anything about their comments”.

The Collegium, which was headed by then CJI Ranjan Gogoi and comprising four senior-most judges Justices Lokur, A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde, and N.V. Ramana brought certain decisions about the appointment of judges. However, facts were not uploaded on the website. In January 2019, the collegium reconsidered the decisions “in the light of additional materials”.

Topics: Supreme CourtPrashant BhushanRight to InformationCollegium discussionsCJI Ranjan Gogoi
Share5
Tweet
SendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

RAKSHA MANTRI HOLDS 4TH INDIA-FRANCE ANNUAL DEFENCE DIALOGUE WITH MINISTER OF ARMED FORCES OF FRANCE

Next News

US journalist who was detained for wearing LGBTQ T-shirt dies mysteriously in Qatar

Related News

Mandatory Attendance for Law Students? SC Reserves Verdict (This image is generated by AI)

Should attendance be mandatory for law students? Supreme Court reserves verdict

Supreme Court tells Delhi Police that women must feel safe at night (This image is generated by AI}

Women must feel safe walking alone at night: Supreme Court tells Delhi Police to prevent sexual crime against women

SC’s Big Order on SIR: Refuses to suspend CEC Gyanesh Kumar, issues notice on plea challenging ECI decisions

AI Generated Image

Beyond ‘Vote Chori’: Ten facts on SIR, electoral rolls and the Election Commission of India

Choudhri obtained a Talaq divorce in Pakistan without Azhar’s knowledge; the Texas Supreme Court later rejected its recognition over lack of notice and due process

Secret Sharia Talaq Divorce in US: Texas Supreme court rejects divorce over lack of notice, upholds wife’s due process

The Supreme Court has backed regulated green crackers ahead of Diwali while rejecting a blanket ban and stressing pollution, noise and public health concerns

Supreme Court backs green crackers ahead of Deepawali, says festive sentiments & public health must both be considered

Load More

Latest News

NDA leaders meet Karnataka Governor

Karnataka Congress faces ‘political vendetta’ charge as NDA accuses govt of misusing police over Form-7 cases

Padma Shri awardee and Braj Sant Ramesh Baba passed away in Barsana, leaving behind a legacy of Gau Seva and Braj conservation

Padma Shri Sant Ramesh Baba passes away: A life of devotion, Gau Seva and the preservation of Braj’s spiritual legacy

Police and security forces officials briefing the media on the recovery of a Maoist weapons and explosives dump in Dantewada.

Chhattisgarh: Security forces recover major Naxal arms and explosives dump in Dantewada

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Odisha Chief Minister Mohan Charan Majhi and others at a programme at HAL, Sunabeda

Odisha: Rajnath Singh calls for stronger indigenous aero-engine capability as HAL Koraput delivers 2,000th engine

Marking 25 years as head of government PM Modi offers prayers at Delhi's Shri Vinayaka Mandir, renews pledge to serve nation

25 Years of Leadership: PM Modi offers prayers at Shri Vinayaka Mandir, renews pledge to serve nation

Mandatory Attendance for Law Students? SC Reserves Verdict (This image is generated by AI)

Should attendance be mandatory for law students? Supreme Court reserves verdict

Representative Image

From Assembly to Ecosystem: What the next phase of Make in India looks like

UPSC Geo-Scientist 2027 Prelims vs Mains: Know the difference in syllabus, pattern & preparation strategy!

ASHA Didi’s in a Village Regarding Dissemination of Health Issues

Sakhis and Didis: Trained villager women became the backbone of rural governance

Telangana BJP State President N Ramchander Rao

Telangana BJP Chief defends SIR Voter list cleanup, questions Congress governance

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies