Collegium discussions can't be put out in the public domain through RTI: Supreme Court
June 5, 2026
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Collegium discussions can’t be put out in the public domain through RTI: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking to uncover details under the Right to Information (RTI) of a collegium meeting in which decisions were taken about the elevation of judges to the apex court.

WEBDESKWEBDESK
Dec 10, 2022, 07:53 pm IST
in Bharat
Follow on Google News
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking to uncover details under the Right to Information (RTI) of a collegium meeting in which decisions were taken about the elevation of judges to the apex court.

A bench headed by Justice M.R. Shah said, “Only a resolution drawn and signed by all the collegium members can be said to be the final decision…”

The bench added that “it is to be noted that final decision is taken by the collegium only after due consultation and during the consultation some decision takes place, but no final decision is taken and no resolution is drawn, it cannot be said that a final decision is taken by the collegium”.

“Collegium is a multi-member body whose decision embodies into the resolution that may be formally drawn up and signed…,” said the bench, adding that only the final decision needed to be uploaded on the Supreme Court’s website.

It further added that whatever was debated in the collegium was not required to be placed out in the public domain, that too under the RTI Act.

The top court judgment came on a petition by activist Anjali Bhardwaj against the Delhi High Court order, which dismissed her plea seeking the apex court collegium’s agenda in connection with a meeting held on December 12, 2018, when certain findings were purportedly taken on the elevation of some judges to the apex court.

On December 2, the Supreme Court, taking a dig at retired judges, said, “It has become a fashion for them to comment about earlier decisions taken by the collegium, and the existing collegium system should not be derailed on the basis of statements of some busybody”. The apex court highlighted that the collegium was the most transparent establishment.

The bench told that it did not want to make comment on what a few former apex court judges, who were once members of the Supreme Court Collegium, were now saying about the mechanism.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioner RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj, said Justice Madan Lokur, former apex court judge, who was part of the Supreme Court Collegium in 2018, had said that one of the decisions, should have been uploaded on the Supreme Court website.

The bench said, “Nowadays, it has become a fashion to comment upon earlier decisions (of the collegium) made when they (former judges) were part of the collegium”. It further added, “We don’t want to say anything about their comments”.

The Collegium, which was headed by then CJI Ranjan Gogoi and comprising four senior-most judges Justices Lokur, A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde, and N.V. Ramana brought certain decisions about the appointment of judges. However, facts were not uploaded on the website. In January 2019, the collegium reconsidered the decisions “in the light of additional materials”.

Topics: Prashant BhushanRight to InformationCollegium discussionsCJI Ranjan GogoiSupreme Court
Share5TweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

RAKSHA MANTRI HOLDS 4TH INDIA-FRANCE ANNUAL DEFENCE DIALOGUE WITH MINISTER OF ARMED FORCES OF FRANCE

Next News

US journalist who was detained for wearing LGBTQ T-shirt dies mysteriously in Qatar

Related News

Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan

Delhi Anti-Hindu Riots: Prashant Bhushan’s ‘Cover Blown’? Held meetings, conspired with anti-nationals Umar, Sharjeel

Supreme Court remarks have revived the UAPA bail debate, with supporters citing national security concerns

UAPA Bail Debate: Striking a delicate balance between individual liberty and national security

Supreme Court invokes Article 142, issues strict timelines to curb delay in High Court judgments

Supreme Court invokes Article 142, orders strict timelines for High Court judgments to end delays in justice delivery

SIR and Article 324: Supreme Court strengthens the constitutional spine of Indian Democracy; Reaffirms ECI’s authority

Andhra Pradesh cancels Pastor Anand’s SC certificate following Apex Court’s verdict on SC/ST Act on Christian converts

Supreme Court - DMK leader MK Stalin

Tamil Nadu: After reserving judgment, SC Bench recuses from delivering verdict in Stalin’s 2011 Kolathur election case

Load More

Latest News

Uttar Pradesh leads in Bharat's green transformation

World Environment Day 2026: On his birthday, Yogi Adityanath’s green vision powers Uttar Pradesh’s transformation

As Khalistani networks seek new platforms beyond the West, Azerbaijan has emerged as a key venue for conferences, campaigns and narratives aligned with the Pakistan-Turkey axis against India.

Khalistan’s New Grazing Ground: Azerbaijan emerges as new hub for Turkey-Pakistan backed anti-India networks

Kochi IPL Mystery: Why Did Sunanda Pushkar Surrender Stake Amid Benami Claims Tied to Shashi Tharoor, Sonia Gandhi?

Kochi IPL Mystery: Why Did Sunanda Pushkar Surrender Stake Amid Benami Claims Tied to Shashi Tharoor, Sonia Gandhi?

BAPS Hindu Mandir Abu Dhabi wins “Tolerance Award 2026” for promoting peace, universal harmony and mutual respect

Former CPM leader PP Divya - Late Naveen Babu, ADM. (Left to Right)

Kannur ADM Naveen Babu’s death case: Keralam Cabinet approves CBI enquiry

(Left) Ramalinga Reddy (Right) KH Muniyappa

Karnataka: Ramalinga Reddy resigns, Muniyappa voices displeasure; Congress rebellion grows over portfolio allocation

MP Child Rights Commission uncovers massive record discrepancies at illegal residential Madrasa

MP Child Rights Commission uncovers massive discrepancies at Mandsaur Madrasa, questions fate of missing girls

Barkatullah University to be renamed as Vagdevi Bhojpal University

MP: Barkatullah University to be renamed as Vagdevi Bhojpal University; Varsity’s executive council approves proposal

How the Gulf Crisis Is Rewriting the Global Energy Order and Why India Holds the Next Ace

How the Gulf Crisis Is Rewriting the Global Energy Order and Why India Holds the Next Ace

Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan

Delhi Anti-Hindu Riots: Prashant Bhushan’s ‘Cover Blown’? Held meetings, conspired with anti-nationals Umar, Sharjeel

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies