Don't compare Turban, Kirpan with Hijab: SC to petitioners challenging Karnataka HC judgement on hijab ban
October 4, 2026
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • World Hindu Congress 2026
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • World Hindu Congress 2026
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Don’t compare Turban, Kirpan with Hijab: SC to petitioners challenging Karnataka HC judgement on hijab ban

The remarks by a five-judge bench of the apex court were targeted towards Advocate Nizamuddin Pasha, appearing for one of the petitioners, who is a student of Islam and Arabic, tried to draw similarities between the Kirpan and turban with the hijab.

WEBDESKWEBDESK
Sep 8, 2022, 06:42 pm IST
inBharat
Follow on Google News
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsAppTelegramEmail

New Delhi [India]: The Supreme Court on Thursday said that there is no comparison between Kirpan and turban of Sikhs with the hijab as a five-judge bench of the apex court held that wearing turban and kirpan is allowed for Sikhs.

The remarks came when a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia heard various petitions challenging the Karnataka High Court judgement upholding the ban on hijab in educational institutes.
Advocate Nizamuddin Pasha, appearing for one of the petitioners, who is a student of Islam and Arabic, tried to draw similarities between the Kirpan and turban with the hijab.

Pasha said that the hijab is a part of the religious practice of Muslim girls and also asked if girls can be stopped from coming to school wearing hijab. He further argued that even Sikh students wear turbans.

Pasha stressed that cultural practices should be protected.

Justice Gupta said that comparison with Sikhs may not be proper as carrying of the kirpan is recognized by the Constitution. “So don’t compare practices,” the court remarked.

Justice Gupta said there are statutory requirements on turbans and these are all practices well established in the culture of the country.

Pasha tries to cite examples of foreign countries like France.

Justice Gupta said that we do not want to be according to France or Austria. “We are Indians and want to be in India,” the court said.

Pasha while countering the Karnataka HC judgement said that the hijab protects Muslim women.

Pasha said that the findings of Karnataka HC that the Hijab is a cultural practice are based on the assumption. He cited various religious books to support his arguments.

He also argued that it was a misreading of the footnote that the HC held that the Hijab is a “recommendation” and not “essential”.

Senior advocate Devadatt Kamat said that every religious practice is not essential but it is not that the state goes on restricting it.

During the hearing, Kamat, appearing for another petitioner apprised the court that divergent views were taken by Karnataka, Kerala and Madras High Court judgments on whether the hijab is an essential religious practice. Madras and Kerala courts have held Hijab as an essential religious practice but Karnataka HC differed, Kamat said.

“Karnataka Government Order on the prescription of uniform in educational institutes suffers from non-application of mind,” he further added. (ANI)

Topics: Supreme CourtHijab rowKarnataka High Courthijab baneducational institutions
Share2
Tweet
SendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

Government tightens noose around Chinese shell companies, raids underway in Delhi, Gurugram, Bengaluru and Hyderabad

Next News

New era begins, PM Modi inaugurates ‘Kartavya Path’ at India Gate

Related News

Choudhri obtained a Talaq divorce in Pakistan without Azhar’s knowledge; the Texas Supreme Court later rejected its recognition over lack of notice and due process

Secret Sharia Talaq Divorce in US: Texas Supreme court rejects divorce over lack of notice, upholds wife’s due process

The Supreme Court has backed regulated green crackers ahead of Diwali while rejecting a blanket ban and stressing pollution, noise and public health concerns

Supreme Court backs green crackers ahead of Deepawali, says festive sentiments & public health must both be considered

Supreme Court allows UPI Merchant Discount Rate framework to proceed; Urges govt to explain legal basis of the policy

AI-generated Image

Bar social media firms from adding minors, frame statutory rules: Supreme Court tells government

SC has overturned the Bombay High Court’s decision granting default bail to an accused in a PFI-linked UAPA case

PFI-linked UAPA case: Supreme Court overturns default bail, directs accused to surrender

Left: Danam Nagender as a winning BRS MLA; Centre: Rahul Gandhi and Revanth Reddy; Right: Danam Nagender.

BJP Telangana welcomes SC verdict on MLA Danam’s disqualification; calls Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Samvidhan Bachao’ a fake drama

Load More

Latest News

New York Imam Ridhwan Sebkhaoui

“9/11 was the single biggest moment in American Muslim history”: US Imam urges Muslims to seize its opportunities

Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Dr Mohan Yadav and Home Minister Amit Shah

Madhya Pradesh: Home Minister Amit Shah vows drug-free state by 2029: Hails new criminal laws as justice-oriented

Captain Smit Machchhar(Left) Film maker Santosh Pandit (Right)

‘No salute, no thanks’: Film maker Santosh Pandit questions Keralam stars’ silence over Smit Machchhar

VHP National Spokesperson Vinod Bansal condemns attack on Ohio Hindu Mandir

US: Vishwa Hindu Parishad condemns attack on Ohio Hindu Mandir; Vindo Bansal seeks action & security for the community

Captain Smit Machchhar and Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Flydubai Terror Attack: PM Netanyahu speaks to Captain Smit; Invites PM Modi & Indian pilot for Israel Independence Day

Chenai, Dhanda after winning mixed team trap gold

Japan Asian Games 2026 | ‘Never, never, never give up’: Chenai, Dhanda stress power of self-belief

Choudhri obtained a Talaq divorce in Pakistan without Azhar’s knowledge; the Texas Supreme Court later rejected its recognition over lack of notice and due process

Secret Sharia Talaq Divorce in US: Texas Supreme court rejects divorce over lack of notice, upholds wife’s due process

ABVP demands Ashoka Chakra for Captain Smit Machchhar

ABVP Office-Bearers Meeting in Itanagar: Demands Ashoka Chakra for Captain Smit Machchhar for his exemplary courage

The Peshmerga Forces: How Iraqi Kurdistan is building a stronger security apparatus!

The Crown Has Changed, But Not the Mindset!

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies