News Analysis No convergence of interest between India and US on nuke deal
July 15, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
MAGAZINE
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS in News
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home General

News Analysis No convergence of interest between India and US on nuke deal

by Archive Manager
Nov 4, 2007, 12:00 am IST
in General
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

Washington has recovered sufficiently from the initial shock of being told that the Indo-US nuclear deal is virtually off, and with it the prospects of multi-billion dollar sales of nuclear reactors and heavy water fuel, to exert strong pressure on the Indian government. In an article titled ?America'sStrategic Opportunity with India: The New US-India Partnership? in Foreign Affairs (November-December 2007), Nicholas Burns, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, insists that India complete formalities with the IAEA and NSG by November-end so the Congress can approve the deal by Christmas.

The BJP, which once considered a no-confidence motion on the nuclear deal, and the Left parties, which hold the UPA government in the palm of their hands, and Third Front parties of the UNPA, not to mention UPA allies who do not favour the deal, must now keep a close watch on developments in New Delhi to thwart a quick covert operation at the behest of Uncle Sam. As the majority of parties in Parliament clearly oppose the deal, preliminary consultations on a coordinated no-confidence motion are in order because despite Dr. Manmohan Singh and Ms. Sonia Gandhi hinting the deal was off at the Hindustan Times Leadership Summit, the subsequent flip-flop by central ministers suggests the government may still try to push it through.

The US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs is candid that Washington wants New Delhi to play a key role in furthering its global interests amidst growing anti-Americanism worldwide. The principal carrot offered is, of course, the war on terror, but covers combating international drug and criminal cartels, trafficking in women and children, and climate change.

President Bush decided to place a strategic bet on India on coming to power, and specifically tackled the non-proliferation issue by calling for cooperation in four strategic areas, viz., civil nuclear energy, civilian space programme, high-tech commerce, and missile defence. Mr. Burns claims that when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice visited India in March 2005, she offered to ?de-hyphenate? the American policy of balancing ?India-Pakistan? by pursuing an independent relationship with both India and Pakistan, and breaking the non-proliferation orthodoxy by establishing full civil nuclear cooperation with an energy-starved India.

What Mr. Burns does not say, of course, is that America only re-worked the language of its diplomacy in the region, and actually intensified its relationship with Islamabad by making Pakistan a major non-NATO ally. That this has not furthered the war on terror in Afghanistan or even Pakistan is, however, another matter. Pakistan still remains Washington'smost trusted ally, to the extent that it allowed Gen. Musharraf to deport former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif when he returned home to fight the elections, and brokered a deal for the return of the stridently anti-India Ms. Benazir Bhutto. The attempt on Ms. Bhutto'slife so early in her return journey, however, shows that like most of America's?deals,? this one too is half-stitched.

Sensing Dr. Manmohan Singh'sweakness, however, President Bush is determined to bring India into the non-proliferation regime, directly or indirectly. Having worked on the deal since Dr. Singh'sWashington visit in July 2005, Mr. Bush and the US nuclear industry are unwilling to let go of the opportunity to ?help? India construct new power plants and sell latest nuclear fuel and technology. Indeed, the December 2006 Hyde Act was passed by the US Congress to facilitate American investment in India'scivil nuclear power industry. The US Atomic Energy Act required a legal basis for bilateral nuclear collaboration, and hence the ?123 agreement? was made in July 2007.

These agreements were made to benefit the United States. Mr. Burns is categorical that under the deal, India would submit its entire civil nuclear programme to international inspection by permanently placing 14 of 22 nuclear power plants and all future civil reactors under International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards. In one generation, 90 per cent of India'sreactors would be covered by agreement and India ?brought into the international nuclear non-proliferation mainstream.? There is no room for ambiguity in this assertion, hence the danger of this ill-conceived Indo-US civil nuclear deal being operationalised is alive.

It bears stating that the decision to grant India the right to reprocess spent fuel was no big deal, and Japan and the European Atomic Energy Community already enjoy such a facility. Besides, as Mr. Burns points out, this right is operational only after India builds a state-of-the-art reprocessing facility fully monitored by the IAEA and US agrees to the specific arrangements and procedures for it. The UPA has not informed the Indian public about this condition. Moreover, in the event of India conducting a nuclear test, Washington retains the right under US law to seek return of all nuclear fuel and technology from US firms. Clearly this is a one-way deal, serving only American corporate interests.

Another objectionable objective is to corner India-friendly nations like Iran. It is evident that what America really seeks is to out-source some of its pressing needs to India, particularly in the fields of military and intelligence, agriculture and education, energy and environment, and freedom and democracy (read: attacking target nations like Myanmar and Nepal, but not Pakistan). Washington particularly wants the Indian Navy to protect the sea-lanes between the Middle East, Africa and East Asia. It is also keen to sell equipment to the Indian Army.

As in the past, there is really no convergence of interests between India and the US, and any kind of partnership can only be on an issue-to-issue basis. As in the post-World War II era, American imperialism, its undying thirst for economic and strategic advantage at any cost, constitutes the gravest threat to global security and peace.

ShareTweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

PRAVASI BHARATIYA Ganesh festival in Thailand

Next News

The Ram legend and the canal controversy

Related News

Legendary Marathoner Fauja Singh dies at 114 in tragic road accident

“Turbaned Tornado” Fauja Singh, world’s oldest marathoner passes away at 114 in a road accident

Golden temple gets bomb threat email

Bomb Threat Email Targets Golden Temple: Punjab Police steps up security, launches probe

Prataprao Ganpatrao Jadhav, Minister of State (Independent Charge), Ministry of Ayush, Government of India addressing the gathering at the  inauguration ceremony of Shalyacon 2025

AIIA Hosts National Shalya Tantra Conference; Highlights integrative Ayurvedic surgery

International Day of Population: Addressing global issues and demographic shifts

Union Home Minister Amit Shah addressing the gathering on the occasion of Bharat Vikas Parishad foundation day

Bharat Vikas Parishad Foundation Day: Amit Shah hails BVP for national service and embodying ideals of Vivekananda

Andhra Pradesh: Senior TDP leader Ashok Gajapathi Raju named Governor of Goa

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Legendary Marathoner Fauja Singh dies at 114 in tragic road accident

“Turbaned Tornado” Fauja Singh, world’s oldest marathoner passes away at 114 in a road accident

Golden temple gets bomb threat email

Bomb Threat Email Targets Golden Temple: Punjab Police steps up security, launches probe

Prataprao Ganpatrao Jadhav, Minister of State (Independent Charge), Ministry of Ayush, Government of India addressing the gathering at the  inauguration ceremony of Shalyacon 2025

AIIA Hosts National Shalya Tantra Conference; Highlights integrative Ayurvedic surgery

International Day of Population: Addressing global issues and demographic shifts

Union Home Minister Amit Shah addressing the gathering on the occasion of Bharat Vikas Parishad foundation day

Bharat Vikas Parishad Foundation Day: Amit Shah hails BVP for national service and embodying ideals of Vivekananda

Andhra Pradesh: Senior TDP leader Ashok Gajapathi Raju named Governor of Goa

Viksit Gaon for Viksit Bharat: Modi Govt's Rural Blueprint

Viksit Gaon, Viksit Bharat: Modi govt’s rural blueprint to empower villages by 2047

Church built by Christian Missionaries on an encroached hill in Thiruvannamalai

17 Church-linked institutions continue squatting on temple lands despite court orders to vacate

Union Minister Jitan Ram Manjhi, courtesy: getty images

Bihar voter list revision: “ECI is doing a good job,” says Union Minister Jitan Ram Manjhi 

Democracy: A test for the West

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies