Hijab Controversy: Make Uniform Dress Code Mandatory
Thursday, August 11, 2022
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • RSS in News
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
SUBSCRIBE
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • RSS in News
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • RSS in News
  • Subscribe
Home Bharat

Hijab Controversy: Make Uniform Dress Code Mandatory

Rahul Kumar Jha by Rahul Kumar Jha
Feb 15, 2022, 05:25 am IST
in Bharat, Analysis, Delhi
Muslim girls, studying in educational institutions in the Southern State, are being indoctrinated to flaunt their religious identity

Muslim girls, studying in educational institutions in the Southern State, are being indoctrinated to flaunt their religious identity

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterTelegramEmail
Students must follow the specific dress code as we are not a country which runs on religious lines. India runs on rules and regulations that might be in contrast with one’s faith  

 

Wearing religious symbols is fundamentally against the concept of uniformity in educational institutions as well as against modern values.

After some colleges in the Udupi district in Karnataka banned hijab in college premises citing the uniform code, it has once again triggered social as well as political debates on whether wearing religious symbol should be allowed inside educational institutions. Also whether wearing religious symbols is protected under Article 25 of Indian Constitution? While these points are being extensively discussed in the media, one point which we are missing here is, what about the concept of uniform in educational institutions? Are we willing to compromise with the concept of uniformity inside an educational institution with the cultural phenomenon of a certain group?

Download Organiser App

Concept of Uniform in Educational Institutions

While there is no recorded history about when the concept of uniforms was introduced in society, it is believed to have been introduced in the 16th Century in Britain. The benefits of uniforms in schools and colleges have been extensively studied and found to be positively effective toward behavioural problems. The case study of the Long Beach Unified School District in the US shows that suspensions and expulsions were reduced by 28 per cent (elementary) and 36 per cent (middle school), crime and vandalism by 74 per cent (elementary) and 18 per cent (middle school), sex offences by 74 per cent. Uniforms also bring about positive changes in attendance and enhance the learning environment.

Uniform Creates A Level Play Field  

While there can always be a debate on the effects on uniform in school, it is not a rocket science to understand that uniform plays a vital role in mitigating the gap between individual’s social and economic status and gives a level playing field to everyone. It has the ultimate aim of suppressing individuality among students.

Different faiths have different cultures that inspire clothing. Some religions even dictate (or assume to be dictated) dress code. But to force religious dress code in educational institutions is like being dictated by religion. 

Educational institutions are not religious places. These are the places where students of different religious groups, ethnicity come together to study, not to be segregated by their own religious dress code. If it is insisted that hijab should be allowed, as it is mandatory in Islam, then what about when other religious group demand the same? What if a person, belonging to Buddhism, insists on wearing saffron cloth and walks into the classroom barefoot? Or a religious group demands a completely different setup within the campus? The whole matter of wearing hijab shouldn’t be seen as an isolated incident. We must also consider the outcomes when other religious groups start demanding its dress code to put above the uniforms of schools and colleges.

The most important question arises here is, whether wearing religious symbols inside educational institutions is protected under Article 25 of the Indian Constitution? Whether right to profess one’s religion also include places like schools and colleges?

While there are different views of Indian courts on this, one question always comes in picture, whether wearing Hijab in mandatory in Islam or it is just a political Islamic outcome?

Like any other issue, there are differences among Islamic scholars on this too.

Educational institutions shouldn’t be dragged into the debate of religion; rather they should be focused on creating an environment which diminishes the gap among students. Visible religious symbols do exactly opposite; it creates groups inside campuses which shouldn’t be promoted

Holy Quran doesn’t explicitly talk about hijab or burqa; it does talk about wearing clothes that are modest. The word “hijab” itself doesn’t mean headscarf; it means “curtain or partition”. The most common acceptable principle about hijab is, “While the hijab in indeed a women’s obligation in Islam, it is not a pillar of Islam”. One of the five core tenets of the Islam are faith, prayer, charity, fasting and pilgrimage to Mecca. Many Muslim women don’t cover their face or head, are they less Muslims? When wearing hijab is not the core of Islam, then why should it be protected under Article 25 of Indian Constitution?

For a moment, let us assume wearing hijab or burqa in an integral part of Islam, then should educational institution also permit the same in their campuses?

Article 25 does guarantee individual’s right to profess one’s religion but this Article also comes with reasonable restrictions. Let see what exactly Article 25 of Indian Constitution says.

Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion

(1)    Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
(2)    Nothing in this Article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law.

(a)    Regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice.
As it is clear that Article 25 doesn’t provide arbitrary right to profess one’s religion, and it comes with restrictions that give State power to restrict freedom of religion subject to certain conditions. Restriction on wearing religious symbols does fall into the category of these restrictions. Moreover, educational institutions shouldn’t be dragged into the debate of religion; rather they should be focused on creating an environment which diminishes the gap among students. Visible religious symbols do exactly the opposite; it creates groups inside campuses which shouldn’t be promoted.

Regressive Practises Support Fundamentalists 

Patriarchal society is always mindful to make women understand that its codes and conduct for women is good for them. Veiling of women is one of the patriarchal products. We have seen numerous propaganda videos about how veiling a woman's body is meant to safeguard her modesty; they also insist that because they regard women as more precious they should cover themselves.

These are nothing but justification of a regressive practice that men have envisaged for women. Patriarchal society has always been able to gather a large group of women who support its idea of society. 

Be it Sati practise or Devadasi system, there were always a group of women, who were in support of these practises. Just because a woman believes that something proposed by patriarchal society is good for her or terms it as her right; it doesn’t close scope for further debate. Wearing a hijab or burqa or any other veiling clothes is not a personal choice as it seems. It comes with lots of mind brushing, moral policing and from lenses of religious scrutiny. A lot of women don’t have choices in matters of burqa or hijab. When we defend the right to wear hijab or burqa, we also must keep in mind that when the world is heading toward a society where men and women are equal, any support of regressive practises would be counted as support of fundamentalists of religion.

Modernity demands us to stop issuing dictates to women to cover their body. Diversity shouldn’t be an excuse to appear different everywhere.

As usual, a part of Indian intellectuals criticised Government to single out Muslims and cites diversity as an excuse to defend the demand of permitting wearing hijab in colleges. Yes, India is a diverse country; it does have different culture, food and attire. But that doesn’t mean one should flaunt his/her diversity everywhere. 

There are some places which require uniformity not diversity, and educational institutions are one of these places. Not only educational institutions, there are other places which also require uniformity. Can we imagine a lawyer practising in Supreme Court or high courts wearing hijab or burqa or other religious attire?

Government or private educational institutions have the right to ask for a uniform dress code for all their students, irrespective of their religion, and there is nothing wrong in it. Students must follow the specific dress code, which is neutral to all students. There shouldn’t be any ifs and buts on this. After all, we are not a country which runs on religious lines; India runs on rules and regulations that might be in contrast with one’s religious beliefs. When religious beliefs clash with country’s law; law must supersede religion. As a secular nation our aim should be to promote scientific temper, not the religious ones. 

 

ShareTweetSendShareSend
Previous News

Kreately Media’s Twitter Account Suspended, Netizens Demand Its Restoration

Next News

Corbevax COVID vaccine is safe, offers high antibody levels: NTAGI chief

Related News

Akhand Bharat: It was a reality, it isn’t just an imaginary idea

Akhand Bharat: It was a reality, it isn’t just an imaginary idea

Rakshabandhan (Shravan, Shukla Paksha,  Purnima)

Rakshabandhan (Shravan, Shukla Paksha, Purnima)

Gaganyaan mission: ISRO successfully tests Gaganyaan Low Altitude Escape Motor

Gaganyaan mission: ISRO successfully tests Gaganyaan Low Altitude Escape Motor

China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative on the verge of collapse, becoming a burden to the economy

China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative on the verge of collapse, becoming a burden to the economy

Tricolour reflects pride of India’s past, commitment of present and dreams of future: PM Modi

Tricolour reflects pride of India’s past, commitment of present and dreams of future: PM Modi

Two terrorists attempting to infiltrate army camp in J-K neutralised; 3 soldiers martyred

Two terrorists attempting to infiltrate army camp in J-K neutralised; 3 soldiers martyred

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Akhand Bharat: It was a reality, it isn’t just an imaginary idea

Akhand Bharat: It was a reality, it isn’t just an imaginary idea

Rakshabandhan (Shravan, Shukla Paksha,  Purnima)

Rakshabandhan (Shravan, Shukla Paksha, Purnima)

Gaganyaan mission: ISRO successfully tests Gaganyaan Low Altitude Escape Motor

Gaganyaan mission: ISRO successfully tests Gaganyaan Low Altitude Escape Motor

China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative on the verge of collapse, becoming a burden to the economy

China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative on the verge of collapse, becoming a burden to the economy

Tricolour reflects pride of India’s past, commitment of present and dreams of future: PM Modi

Tricolour reflects pride of India’s past, commitment of present and dreams of future: PM Modi

Two terrorists attempting to infiltrate army camp in J-K neutralised; 3 soldiers martyred

Two terrorists attempting to infiltrate army camp in J-K neutralised; 3 soldiers martyred

India highlights the importance of Africa to the International Community in UN

India highlights the importance of Africa to the International Community in UN

Shinzo Abe assassination: Opposition parties probe into Church’s involvement in Japanese politics

Shinzo Abe assassination: Opposition parties probe into Church’s involvement in Japanese politics

Veer Savarkar and Tricolour Flag: Allegations and Reality

Veer Savarkar and Tricolour Flag: Allegations and Reality

Islamic Jihad Not Hamas the Most Prominent Threat to Israel from Gaza

Islamic Jihad Not Hamas the Most Prominent Threat to Israel from Gaza

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping Policy

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Special Report
  • Sci & Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Books
  • Interviews
  • Travel
  • Health
  • Obituary
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Refund and Cancellation

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies