In a development that has created uncertainty around the film’s release timeline, the Kerala High Court issued clear instructions to the producers not to proceed with any transaction related to the sale or transfer of theatrical or distribution rights. The court emphasised that no release-related step should be taken until it completes a detailed examination of the petitions questioning the film’s certification.
The bench observed during the hearing that the concerns raised by petitioners “appear possibly genuine” and therefore require careful judicial scrutiny. Given the limited time before the proposed release date, the court adopted a cautious approach, effectively placing the sequel under temporary pause.
What the court says?
The Kerala High Court reserved its order on the release of The Kerala Story 2 after hearing detailed arguments from the petitioners, the filmmakers, and the Union Government. The decision, expected on Thursday (Feb 25), will determine whether the film can hit theatres as scheduled on February 27.
During the hearing, sharp exchanges took place in court, particularly when the producers pressed for an urgent ruling, citing distribution commitments and international release plans. They argued that even a day’s delay would cause significant losses. Justice Bechu Kurian, however, cautioned them against attempting to “corner the court” into delivering a hurried verdict, making it clear that the judiciary would take the necessary time to examine all legal aspects before passing an order.
Senior Counsel S Sreekumar, appearing for the filmmakers, contended that the petition was not legally maintainable and rejected the allegation that the film defames Kerala. The Union Government also defended the clearance granted by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), arguing that it is a statutory expert body under the Cinematograph Act and that courts should not interfere with certified films unless there is clear illegality. The producer, in his counter affidavit, maintained that the challenge was based merely on a two-minute teaser and ignored the broader narrative of the film, which includes characters from multiple states.
Petitioner Sreedev Namboodiri has argued that the film’s title and storyline unfairly link Kerala with terrorism and forced conversions, potentially harming the state’s image and disturbing communal harmony. During proceedings, Justice Kurian also raised questions about consistency in CBFC standards, referring to the Malayalam film Haal, where a scene involving an RSS worker was reportedly asked to be removed.
Bench questions CBFC certification
The court also raised questions regarding the certification granted by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The film was awarded a UA certificate rather than an A rating, a decision that came under judicial scrutiny, considering the sensitive subject matter portrayed in the narrative.
Judges noted that the nature of the content warranted closer examination and indicated that the matter required fuller consideration before allowing the producers to proceed with commercial release formalities.
The bench’s direction does not amount to a ban but effectively restrains the makers from taking any irreversible business decisions related to distribution until the next hearing.
CBFC and producers defend film
Counsel representing the CBFC defended the certification decision, arguing that films referencing states or cities in their titles are not uncommon in Indian cinema. Examples cited before the court included Go Goa Gone, Once Upon a Time in Mumbaai, and Delhi Belly.
The producers’ counsel maintained that the sequel focuses on the experiences of women survivors and aims to depict their struggles. It was further argued that the petitions raise broader constitutional and legal questions, including whether the grievance qualifies as a matter of public interest.
Importantly, the filmmakers assured the bench that no release rights would be transferred and no commercial arrangements finalised until the court delivers its decision.
Why the film is controversial
The Kerala Story 2 revisits a contentious and politically sensitive theme. The film portrays young Hindu women being lured into interfaith relationships, followed by abuse and forced religious conversion. This narrative has sparked objections from certain sections of the Malayali community, leading to fresh legal challenges.
The sequel is directed by Kamakhya Narayan Singh and produced by Vipul Amrutlal Shah. The lead cast includes Ulka Gupta, Aditi Bhatia, and Aishwarya Ojha. The film was scheduled for release on February 27, but its immediate future now hinges on the outcome of the next hearing.
What lies ahead
The High Court’s interim direction has injected fresh suspense into the film’s release plans. While the order stops short of prohibiting exhibition, it freezes all release-related transactions until judicial review is complete.
The upcoming hearing is expected to determine whether the film will proceed to theatres as planned or face further delay. For now, fans and industry observers await clarity as the court continues its examination of both the petitions and the certification process under scrutiny.
