Mahant Shri Rishiraj Giri Ji Maharaj of Sambhal’s Kaila Devi is one of the eight petitioners in the Sambhal site (Harihar Mandir/ Shahi Jama Masjid) case. In an exclusive interview with Organiser’s Senior Assistant Editor Nishant Kumar Azad, he said the preparation to file the petition was started a long time back and if things go well, the then Hindus will soon get an opportunity to perform puja at the site. Excerpts:
What inspired you to file the petition claiming that the disputed site is actually the exact place where Harihar Temple was located?
The inspiration came from divine grace and the teachings of my Guru. My Guruji often spoke about the history of the Harihar Temple. Local residents have also long discussed this. Historical texts, such as the Ain-e-Akbari, Baburnama, and Skanda Purana have given reference to this site. These accounts, combined with divine guidance, compelled us to take this step.
How did you proceed after deciding to file the petition?
I researched extensively and, with guidance, approached advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain Ji. After contacting him, we discussed the matter, and he agreed to represent us.
It is said that until 2012, puja was regularly conducted near a well on the disputed site. Is this true?
Yes, it is completely true. Puja was performed there regularly. However, some Muslim leaders unnecessarily created controversies around the puja at the well, which led to a situation where Hindus were stopped from visiting the site and performing the puja.
Who were the people responsible for stopping the worship?
That can be best answered by the locals of Sambhal or the authorities at that time. I believe there was a Dr Barq who was in charge then, and he was instrumental in stopping the puja.
With the court’s directive for a survey, we saw incidents of violence on the very first day. Considering this, do you think the proceedings might lead to more unrest in the community?
Such disruptions are caused by jihadis. These people are troublemakers, whether in Bangladesh or Sambhal. Fortunately , their activities have reduced now. The DNA (roots) of those creating these disruptions is evident.
“We seek the restoration of the Harihar Temple, recognition of its history, and the right to resume worship. Evidence from scriptures and historical records supports this claim ”
When you say “DNA,” are you referring to a specific group?
Yes, I am referring to those who oppose the truth and create disturbances. These are not new incidents; such things have been happening here for a long time. But now, these disruptions will not be tolerated. Puja will again begin in the temple, and the court’s verdict will be respected by all.
What is your primary demand in this case?
We seek the restoration of the Harihar Temple, recognition of its history, and the right to resume worship. Evidence from scriptures and historical records supports this claim. We also request that Islamic prayers at the disputed site be stopped, and puja in the temple be re-established.
Some leaders in Sambhal, such as Acharya Pramod Krishnam, are also constructing temples. How does that align with the fact that Bhagwan Kalki’s incarnation will occur at this site?
Acharyaji is doing commendable work, enhancing Sambhal’s spiritual significance. However, our focus is on the ancient Harihar Temple, believed to be the site of Bhagwan Kalki’s incarnation, as per historical and spiritual evidence.
If the court rules in favour of Hindus then what will happen to the current structure?
Changes to structures are part of history. If the court recognises the site as a temple, the structure may undergo transformation. Our aim is to restore the temple to its divine and historical glory.
You have mentioned that your Guru frequently spoke about the Mandir. Could you share more about his teachings?
My Guru, Param Pujya Shri Shri Baba Ratangar Ji Maharaj, often discussed the spiritual and historical significance of the site. He encouraged us to protect and honour our heritage.
If the court rules against the Hindu Community, will you accept the judgement?
Absolutely. We have full faith in the judiciary. Whatever the court decides, we will respect and abide by it.
