Hamare Barrah Row: Netizens call out ‘Double standard’ of court, reminds SC about comment related to ‘PK’ petition
June 20, 2026
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Hamare Barrah Row: Netizens call out ‘Double standard’ of court, reminds SC about comment related to ‘PK’ petition

The Supreme Court has called the film Hamare Barrah’s teaser “offensive” and announced that its release must be halted for now. The film was to hit theatres on June 14, 2024

Yatharth SikkaYatharth Sikka
Jun 13, 2024, 08:00 pm IST
in Bharat, Entertainment
Follow on Google News
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

The Supreme Court on June 13 suspended the screening of the film “Hamare Barrah” and said that they watched the teaser of the movie and found it to be “offensive.” Highlighting that the teaser was full of “objectionable materials,” the Supreme Court took note of the allegations that the movie is derogatory to Islam, especially married Muslim women.

“We have seen the movie trailer in the morning, and all the offensive dialogues continue in the trailer,” the court said while pronouncing their order. A vacation bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta passed the order responding to a plea that challenged the Bombay High Court’s decision to permit the release of the movie. The bench ruled, “Until disposal of the petition before the High Court, screening of the movie in question shall remain suspended”.

It is to be noted that, the bench also commented that the movie’s teaser contains objectionable content. “Today morning, we saw the teaser. It is as such, with all those objectionable materials. The teaser is available on YouTube,” Justice Sandeep Mehta said.

“The teaser is so offensive that the High Court granted an interim order,” Justice Nath added.
The movie was originally scheduled to release on 7 June. The original plea against the movie was filed with Bombay HC by petitioner Azhar Basha Tamboli. The plea was filed against Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), seeking to revoke the certification granted to the film “Hamare Baarah” and halting the release of the movie.

Azhar Basha, the petitioner alleged that the film was in contravention of the provisions of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, and the rules and guidelines associated with it. He further claimed that the trailer was derogatory to the Islamic faith and married Muslim women in India, and the film’s release would violate Articles 19(2) and Article 25 of the Constitution.

However, the CBFC defended its decision to grant the certificate to the movie saying all necessary procedures were followed. The Board said that the objectionable scenes and dialogues were deleted and the trailers of the film released on YouTube and BookMyShow were not certified trailers.

The High Court then postponed the release date from June 7 to June 14 and appointed a review committee to watch the movie. However, when the 3-member committee failed to give a verdict and sought more time, the Bombay High Court on June 7 allowed the release of the movie after the makers agreed to delete some controversial dialogues.

Allowing the release, the high court said, “One individual in a country of 130 crore citizens can not bring such a petition which can stall a film release without granting any guarantee whatsoever for costs incurred by filmmakers in such a case.”

But the Supreme Court bench still prevented the release of the movie, saying that the case pending with the High Court should be resolved first. The bench declined the request of the filmmakers to direct the High Court to dispose of the case within 1 week.  Earlier this week, the film “Hamare Baarah” was banned in Karnataka also.

Contrasting orders by Court

Notably, netizens criticised the court for displaying double standards. They highlighted the case of the movie ‘PK’, starring Aamir Khan, which mocked Hindu gods. In that instance, the Court dismissed the objections by stating, “If you don’t like it, don’t watch it.” This response is now being contrasted with the court’s stance on “Hamare Barrah”.

It is to be noted that, Delhi High Court in 2015 at the time of the release of movie ‘PK’ said there was nothing offensive in Aamir Khan-starrer film ‘PK’ and there was no substance in allegations that it has defamed and maligned Hindu culture and religious practices.

Hurting HINDU sentiments is absolutely fine

But dare you HURT Muslim sentiments

Supreme Court decision on
PK Vs Hamare Barah pic.twitter.com/jlwDGoseO6

— Sheetal Chopra 🇮🇳 (@SheetalPronamo) June 13, 2024

A bench, comprising Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S Endlaw, said there was nothing wrong in the movie and a detailed order would be passed on merits.  “What is wrong in the movie? You cannot take offence at everything. We do not find any substance in the allegations made in the petition. We will pass an order on merits,” the bench said.

Criticising Court, social media user Mr Sinha on ‘X’ wrote that “This Movie Hamare Barah is made on social issue ; population blast. Supreme court banned it because Muslims have objection with it. Where’s the freedom of speech Milord? Is it applicable only on movies which mock Hinduism only?”

This Movie "Hamare Barah" is made on social issue ; population blast. Supreme court banned it because Muslims have objection with it.

Where's the freedom of speech Milord? Is it applicable only on movies which mock Hinduism only? pic.twitter.com/EvA0oIXVRe

— Mr Sinha (@Mrsinha) June 13, 2024

Earlier, the film’s producers, cast and crew has expressed deep concern, stating that not only they but also their family members and friends have been targeted with these threats. However, the police have assured them of their safety in Maharashtra.

Aditi Dhiman, lead actress of the film has revealed that she is receiving threats of beheading, rape, and murder.
In an exclusive conversation with a news channel, Aditi Dhiman said, “I have received so many, sar tan se juda, rape and death threats.They send private messages on social media, and more than half of them are from fake and faceless accounts. As an artist, it’s very heartbreaking, but you have no choice but to ignore them.”
What is Hamare Baarah film about?

“Hamare Baarah” tells the story of Manzoor Ali Khan Sanjari, who, despite losing his first wife during childbirth, continues to have more children with his second wife, now pregnant with her sixth. When doctors warn that the pregnancy risks her life, Khan refuses an abortion. His daughter Alfiya, determined to save her stepmother, takes her father to court to demand the abortion. The film explores whether Alfiya can convince her father and the court, and questions the entrenched patriarchy in their society.

Topics: Supreme CourtHamare Barrah RowManzoor Ali Khan Sanjari
Yatharth Sikka
Yatharth Sikka
Yatharth Sikka is a PhD Research Scholar and a dynamic media professional, working as an Anchor, Writer, Researcher, and Voice-Over Artist. He has also served as a Research Assistant for two books and has produced one documentary, adding depth and scholarly rigour to his journalistic work. As one of the emerging young voices in Indian media, Yatharth extensively covers political and socio-cultural issues with a strong focus on North India — Punjab, Jammu & Kashmir, Haryana, Delhi, and Himachal Pradesh. His storytelling reflects a keen interest in the intersections of politics, sports, society, and everyday life, decoding how policy and power shape public experiences. He has conducted interviews with prominent political leaders, sportspersons, film figures, and cultural commentators, bringing authentic ground-level perspectives to his audience. Yatharth has participated in several national and international conferences and seminars, further strengthening his academic engagement and research capabilities. Combining research-backed analysis with sharp on-ground reporting, Yatharth continues to contribute to contemporary Indian journalism and Research Field. [Read more]
Share1TweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

Career in Oceanography: Explore the hidden jewels

Next News

Jharkhand: ED makes fresh arrest in money laundering case linked to alleged land grabbing in Ranchi

Related News

Supreme Court of India

‘RTI activism has become business’: SC denies anticipatory bail, questions activist’s authority to monitor road project

The AMU Judgment: Why the Supreme Court must revisit Article 30

Tamil Nadu Assembly (File Photo)

Tamil Nadu speaker drops action against 21 rebel AIADMK MLAs after EPS withdrawal, targets 4 who joined TVK

Supreme Court remarks have revived the UAPA bail debate, with supporters citing national security concerns

UAPA Bail Debate: Striking a delicate balance between individual liberty and national security

Supreme Court invokes Article 142, issues strict timelines to curb delay in High Court judgments

Supreme Court invokes Article 142, orders strict timelines for High Court judgments to end delays in justice delivery

SIR and Article 324: Supreme Court strengthens the constitutional spine of Indian Democracy; Reaffirms ECI’s authority

Load More

Latest News

Screen grab of the viral video of Ayaaz Madare and the victim

Nagpur Conversion Case: Absconding Maulana involved in rape of Air Force officer’s wife arrested

Telangana: Secunderabad Cantonment renames 21 British-era roads after Indian military heroes and national icons

Keralam former CM Pinarayi Vijayan - Veena Vijayan (Left to Right)

Keralam CMRL Case: ED examines bank lockers of former CM Pinarayi Vijayan’s daughter Veena

A Constitutional Lesson for Priyank Kharge

Government employess of Balochistan begin indefinite strike against Pakistan

Balochistan on Boil: Govt employees start indefinite strike against Pakistan; 400 LPG bowsers stranded in Tuftan

Uttar Pradesh: Yogi govt unveils farm-to-consumer model to deliver chemical-free food via ‘Poison-Free Food’ mission

Hindu activists booked by Bhatkal police for attempting to save a Hindu girl who was being kidnapped by a muslim man

Karnataka: Hindu activists booked for rescuing girl being taken by Muslim man; Bhatkal police action sparks criticism

NTA Changes Prayagraj Exam Venue Ahead of NEET UG 2026 Re-Test, Releases New Admit Cards

NEET UG 2026 Re-Test: NTA moves Prayagraj centre, launches WhatsApp alerts and anti-fraud advisory

Security forces have arrested Aizaz Ahmad Khanday, Arbaz Ahmad Mir, and Nasir Ahmad Dar in Shopian after recovering explosive substances and Hizbul Mujahideen posters from their possession (Image Source: X)

J&K: High grade explosive PEK seized in Shopian from 3 OGWs working for HM; 2 held in Kishtwar for terror links

PM Modi’s Gift to Global Leaders: Kalamkari Mahabharat, Charaka Samhita reflects India’s timeless artistic heritage

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies