Minority-Majority Discrimination Should Go
March 31, 2023
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • More
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • My States
    • Vocal4Local
    • Business
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
SUBSCRIBE
No Result
View All Result
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • More
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • My States
    • Vocal4Local
    • Business
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • RSS in News
  • My States
  • Vocal4Local
  • Subscribe
Home General

Minority-Majority Discrimination Should Go

Archive Manager by WEB DESK
Nov 20, 2017, 12:00 am IST
in General
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterTelegramEmail

Minority Question : Siphoning off Legitimate Share


Supreme Court urged to declare Hindus as minority in Lakshadweep, Mizoram, Nagaland, Meghalaya, J&K, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur & Punjab, where their legal share is being siphoned off by ‘majority’

Pramod Kumar

The Supreme Court of India might have refused the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking repeal of 1993 Notification on minority community or declare the Hindus as ‘minority’ in the states where they don’t form majority, the issue of siphoning off the legitigate share of Hindus by so-called minorities has drawn the attention of everyone. The Court asked the petitioner to approach the National Commission for Minorities in this regard on November 10. The PIL had stated that the minority rights are being drawn off “illegally and arbitrarily” to the majority population as neither the Centre nor the state has notified Hindus as a ‘minority’ under the National Commission of Minorities Act, 1992.
As per Section 2(c) of the National Commission of Minorities Act, 1992, ‘minority’ means a community notified as such by the Central Government. In exercise of powers conferred by Section 2(c) of the Act, the Central Government through a notification dated October 23, 1993 notified five communities—Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists and Parsis—as ‘minority’ community. Jain’s were also added into the list in 2014, but not the Hindus, who are also minority in
eight states.

As a legal crusader advocate Shri Ashwani Upadhyaya is behind the PILs on a number of issues including Uniform Civil Code, debarring persons from contesting elections against whom charges have been framed in serious offences, appointment of Lokayukta, deporting all illegal migrants including Bangladeshis and Rohingyas, etc. Now he has filed a PIL in Supreme Court seeking minority status to Hindus in eight states where they are in minority. Organiser Sr Correspondent Pramod Kumar spoke to him to know the facts in this PIL. Excerpts:
What is the prime objective of filing this PIL?
The main objective is to ensure the legal as well as constitutional rights of the Hindus, particularly in those states where they are in minority. What
happens today is that the legal rights, which are supposed to relate to the Hindus, are being illegally siphoned off to others who are actually majority due to the mindless notification of 1993. I think that was just for appeasement of a particular community. After that notification, an 11-judge bench of the Supreme Court said that minorities should be identified and notified at the State level. That is why I have challenged it. The notification of 1993 is not only illegal but also
arbitrary and against the spirit of the Constituition. In a 2005 judgement, the three-judge bench of the Court also categorically said that the minority-majority discrimination should go. If we want to ensure unity of the nation, such decisions should be avoided. But just before the elections of 2014, the Jains were also added in the list of minority eyeing on votes.
What does the Constitution say on minority?
There is no definition of minority in the Constitution. In the United Nations, two words—‘inferior’ population and ‘non-dominant’ population are used. The word ‘non-dominant’ has also to be in three aspects—socially, politically and economically non-dominant. According to UN norms a particular community is declared minority to ensure their protection. But there is no any such situation in Bharat. I feel there should not be any minority or majority. It is the handiwork of the Congress to garner votes. Earlier, it was only a single department of social justice. But in 2006 they created a separate Ministry for Minority Welfare. Even the framers of our Constitution have not used this word. I feel no community which is more than 2 per cent in any State should be considered as minority. That is why I have requested the SC to declare the notification of 1993 null and void and frame guidelines for minorities according to the definition of the Union. If the court feels that the notification of 1993 is valid, then the Hindus, wherever they are in minority, should also be extended the benefits of minority.
If all are equal, then why this minority-majority politics?
This is what we say. The soon it goes the much better. The Constituent Assembly and the national leaders including Dr Ambedkar were strongly against this word. They used the word ‘minority’ at a place in Article 30 for only opening schools and not for the political use.
What will you do now after the Court directed you to approach the National Commission for Minorities (NCM)?
I have already approached not only the NCM on November 14, but also the Prime Minister, Union Law Minister and Union Minister of Minority Affairs. I hope they would definitly take a favourable decision.    n

According to 2011 Census, Hindus are monitory in Lakshadweep (2.5%), Mizoram (2.75%), Nagaland (8.75%), Meghalaya (11.53%), J&K (28.44%), Arunachal Pradesh (29%), Manipur (31.39%) and Punjab (38.40%). Their ‘minority’ rights are being siphoned off illegally and arbitrarily to the ‘majority’ population because neither Central nor the State Governments have notified them as a ‘minority’ under Section 2(c) of the NCM Act. They are being deprived of their basic rights, guaranteed under Articles 25 to 30. Hence, the 1993 notification on Minority Community is not only arbitrary and irrational but also invalid.
Vast Anomalies
It needs no elaboration that the Muslims are majority in Lakshadweep (96.20%) and J&K (68.30%) and there is significant population in Assam (34.20%), West Bengal (27.5%), Kerala (26.60%), Uttar Pradesh (19.30%) and Bihar (18%). However, they are enjoying the ‘minority’ status, and the communities which are real minorities, are not getting their legitimate share because of non-identification and non-notification of minorities at the State level, thereby jeopardising their basic rights guaranteed under Part-III of the Constitution. Similarly, the Christians are majority in Mizoram, Meghalaya and Nagaland and there is significant population in Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Kerala, Manipur, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, but they are treated as minority. Likewise, Sikhs are majority in Punjab and their population in Delhi, Chandigarh and Haryana is significant, but they are also treated as minority.
The Central Government offered 20,000 scholarships for technical education to the minority students. In J&K, Muslims are 68.30% and Government allotted 717 out of 753 scholarships to Muslim students, but none to the Hindu students citing the 1993 Minority Notification, which declares Muslims as minority. Similarly, ‘Prime Minister’s 15 Points Programme’ meant for religious and linguistic
minorities is not being appropriately used, particularly in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Goa, J&K, Kerala, Lakshadweep, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. Hindus’ legitimate share is being siphoned off arbitrarily to unqualified sections of the population, because of non-identification and non-notification of minorities at State level. Although, it is duty of the Government to identify and notify religious and linguistic minorities at the State level so as to safeguard the rights of minorities guaranteed under Articles 25-30.
“Denial of minority rights to real minorities and arbitrary and unreasonable disbursement of minority benefits to majority, infringes upon Fundamental Right to prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth [Article 15(1)]; impairs the right to equality of opportunity in matters related to public employment [Article 16(1)]; and freedom of conscience and right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion [Article 25(1)]. It also erodes the obligation of the State ‘to endeavour to eliminate inequalities in status, facilities and opportunities’. Therefore, the Court should declare the above stated notification invalid and ultra-virus the Constitution,” the PIL said.
The PIL has raised a very pertinent question as to why legitimate share of the Hindus should be allowed to be siphoned off. The issue needs a decision at national level.   

ShareTweetSendShareSend
Previous News

China with Terrorism : Dragon?s Deadly Game

Next News

Editorial : Forget the Fiefdom

Related News

Bombay Lawyers Body moves SC for action against VP Jagdeep Dhankar, Minister Kiren Rijiju’s remarks on collegium system

Bombay Lawyers Body moves SC for action against VP Jagdeep Dhankar, Minister Kiren Rijiju’s remarks on collegium system

Hindus show permission for Ram Navami rally, say never changed route;Mamata denies, alleges ‘BJP hired goons’ for clash

Hindus show permission for Ram Navami rally, say never changed route;Mamata denies, alleges ‘BJP hired goons’ for clash

CM Disaster Relief Fund ‘Misuse’; Lokayukta refers case against Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan & Ministers to larger bench

West Bengal: Police officer Haider posed as Prince to trap Hindu woman; threatens victim after court grants him bail

West Bengal: Police officer Haider posed as Prince to trap Hindu woman; threatens victim after court grants him bail

BBC stepped into ISIS trap and portrayed Shamima Begum as a victim

BBC stepped into ISIS trap and portrayed Shamima Begum as a victim

Khalistani sympathiser and Lok Sabha MP Simranjit Maan openly supports Amritpal Singh; advises him to flee to Pakistan

Khalistani sympathiser and Lok Sabha MP Simranjit Maan openly supports Amritpal Singh; advises him to flee to Pakistan

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Bombay Lawyers Body moves SC for action against VP Jagdeep Dhankar, Minister Kiren Rijiju’s remarks on collegium system

Bombay Lawyers Body moves SC for action against VP Jagdeep Dhankar, Minister Kiren Rijiju’s remarks on collegium system

Hindus show permission for Ram Navami rally, say never changed route;Mamata denies, alleges ‘BJP hired goons’ for clash

Hindus show permission for Ram Navami rally, say never changed route;Mamata denies, alleges ‘BJP hired goons’ for clash

CM Disaster Relief Fund ‘Misuse’; Lokayukta refers case against Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan & Ministers to larger bench

West Bengal: Police officer Haider posed as Prince to trap Hindu woman; threatens victim after court grants him bail

West Bengal: Police officer Haider posed as Prince to trap Hindu woman; threatens victim after court grants him bail

BBC stepped into ISIS trap and portrayed Shamima Begum as a victim

BBC stepped into ISIS trap and portrayed Shamima Begum as a victim

Khalistani sympathiser and Lok Sabha MP Simranjit Maan openly supports Amritpal Singh; advises him to flee to Pakistan

Khalistani sympathiser and Lok Sabha MP Simranjit Maan openly supports Amritpal Singh; advises him to flee to Pakistan

Hemu Kalani: A freedom fighter lost in the pages of history

Hemu Kalani: A freedom fighter lost in the pages of history

J&K: Hindus paint Srinagar in saffron flags on Ram Navami; devotees dance in joy & chant Jai Sri Ram during procession

J&K: Hindus paint Srinagar in saffron flags on Ram Navami; devotees dance in joy & chant Jai Sri Ram during procession

Ram Navami Shobha Yatra attacked in Mumbai’s Malvani, the third in a row from Maharashtra

Ram Navami Shobha Yatra attacked in Mumbai’s Malvani, the third in a row from Maharashtra

Pakistan: Hindu Doctor shot dead while returning home from clinic in Karachi, second targeted killing in a month

Pakistan: Hindu Doctor shot dead while returning home from clinic in Karachi, second targeted killing in a month

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • My States
  • Vocal4Local
  • Special Report
  • Sci & Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Books
  • Interviews
  • Travel
  • Health
  • Obituary
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Refund and Cancellation

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies