Readers’ Forum
Modi is the winner (Organiser, 30.12.2012); We congratulate Shri Narender Modi on his landslide victory in the Assembly elections in Gujarat. We are happy that at his swearing in ceremony about a lakh people were present. All the prominent leaders of the BJP were present, also present were all the chief ministers of the NDA ruled states except Nitish Kumar of Bihar. The presence of Parkash Singh Badal shows that the Sikhs have full confidence in the leadership of Modi. We firmly believe that the Sikhs in India are safe only under a BJP-dominated government at the Centre. This is the hat-trick by Modi. He became the Chief Minister of Gujarat for the fourth consecutive term. In fact this is the sign of Modi becoming the Prime Minister of India after the elections in 2014. Modi is the need of hour and India badly needs Modi and he is the fittest person to become the Prime Minister in 2014.
AMAR JIT SINGH GORAYA,
30 Gillmartin Dr Griffth, NSW , Australia 2680
UPA working systematically to de-Hinduise India(Organiser, 23.12.2012); This refers to “UPA working systematically to de-Hinduise India”, by Shri JD Arora, in Organiser. He has squarely dealt with the topic in detail. However, the solutions mentioned under “Way out” are not going to solve the problem. They are going to create more problems and not in the interest of Hindus and India. He says that “Hindu Bharat will remember MA Jinnah’s ‘Two Nation Theory’ and prevent the creation of more Pakistans and Bangladeshs on Bharat’s (i.e. truncated India) soil.” What does he mean by “secular Hindu Bharat?” He is assuring Muslims that they will have equal status in secular Hindu Bharat. The first and the foremost question is, that why we should not accept ‘Two Nation Theory’? Infact it has already been accepted by yielding Pakistan as homeland for the Muslims of undivided India. Why we should speak lie. Congress leaders, and those who are in the grip of Congress, says so, only to appease Muslims, who have already created their Pakistan in 1947, and now they have no right to live in India. If we accept, and says that we accept ‘Two Nation Theory’, all the Muslims living in India would be required to go to Pakistan and Bangladesh created by them by voting in favour of Muslim League and Jinnah in 1945-46 elections. Exchange of population which Pakistan and Bangladesh have already done was an essential feature of ‘Two Nation Theory’. Secondly, if we continue to keep Muslims in “Secular Hindu Bharat” of Shri Arora’s concept, how we would stop their rapid rise in population, which is going to convert Bharat into Pakistan within a few decades. Dr. BR Ambedkar had very correctly mentioned in his book Pakistan or the Partition of India on page-364, that “I prefer the Partition of India into Muslim India and non-Muslim India”. Thus he advised that after Partition of India there should be no Muslim in truncated India. We are simply befooling ourselves and the Hindu masses by chanting day and night that we are against ‘Two Nation Theory’.
ANAND PRAKASH, 72/Sector-8, Panchkula-134 109
A marriage in search of a soul (Organiser, 30.12.2012); Apropos of ‘A marriage in search of a soul’ in Organiser. In your esteemed weekly’s column ‘Book Mark’ a novel based on a Bangladeshi Muslim woman marrying an American Christian is reviewed. The idea seems to be discouraging inter-religious marriages solemnised for attaining worldly interests. Achieving material purposes by tieing knots between couples belonging to cultures which are poles apart should never be a genuine cause of a marriage which is regarded as a union of souls and not simply bodies! The Almight has also described it as a source of comfort and not as an uneasy affair:- “It is He, who created you from a single being and out of it, He made its mate that he may find comfort in her”. (Quran-VII: 189) Hence, basically this divine’s design should always be put before finding or selecting a spouse for establishing an ideal, harmonious and comfortable homely life.
SHAKIL AHMED,
22-8-585, Lakkad Kote, Chatta Bazar, Hyderabad:-2
‘Ayodhya Structure’ demolition and nation building (Organiser, 16.12.2012); How can we ever forget the Muslim king who destroyed and decimated Kashi Vishwanatha Temple in 1669 and built a mosque. Thanks to the Hindus who showed determination and grit the Shivalinga was saved while the pillars and reapers of the temple were used in building a mosque! Bindumadhava Temple was destroyed and Alamgir Mosque was built. The holy Kashi is filled with mosques. How is it a veil has been drawn over these daredevilry desecration of temples? The very name Ayodhya capital of the solar kings born of the line of Raghus situated on the river Sarayu—Holy names that fill our hearts with joy and fervour. The icon’s of Ram, Sita, Lakshman and Hanuman we worship is for nishaachara vinaashakaram. When will this, darkness in the minds of so-called secularist, be removed and make them realise that Bharat is the janmabhoomi of Sri Ram and we Hindus who form the majority have a right to build a temple in Ayodhya. Above all religious intrusion into politics and political intrusion into the righteous rights of Hindus should be put an end to. Resolve the issue without prejudice. Don’t hurt the sentiments of the majority. This refusal to accept the just demands will escalate into a crisis.
SHANTA DYUTHIKAR, 39, 15th Cross, Malleshwaram Bengaluru
Hinduism a way of life (Organiser, 30.12.2012); ATM Anwar says that the conquest of north Indian plains by the Central Asian chiefs of martial tribes and races, who were converted to Islam, earlier belonged to Buddhism or were pagans. What an impact Islam, the pious religion of “peace, harmony and fraternity” have on those who embraced it and became invaders and marauders!
BK CHAUDHARI,
A 109, Kedar Housing, Sector XIII, Rohini, Delhi 110 085
Weak Doha deal: Betrayal of global hopes (Organiser, 30.12.2012); This refers to the article ‘Weak Doha Deal:Betrayal of global hopes’ by Bhagwati Prakash Sharma in Organiser. Due to deforestation and indiscriminately depletion of our precious green cover of our mother earth,it has resulted in many adversities like floods,drought,climate change and global warming.
Every year countries around the world meet and blame each other, pull each other’s legs in reducing the carbon emission of their respective country, in making this world less polluted and thus safeguarding the earth’s ozone layer and its environment. Though knowing that at this stage, during these modern days, it is just inevitable to reduce any country’s carbon emission,why is it that instead we not improve our environment and oxygen/ozone layer by increasing our precious green cover of our earth. Instead of making a futile exercise of being stringent of fixing the limits of carbon emission of every country, why is it not mandatory that a minimum percentage of green cover is imposed and sustained by every country and made an international agreement. This can improve the status of our ozone layer and oxygen content of the earth,thus controlling the climate change and keeping the environment intact.
SETURAM ASPARI, email: asparam@rediffmail.com
Interest of the State is more significant than chair What type of turn it would have taken if Karnataka had defied the directives of the Supreme Court for releasing Canvery water to Tamil Nadu? At the most it would have dismissed it’s government and put it’s CM, Irrigation Minister and Chief Secretary behind the bars for contempt of court laws. On the other hand six crore people of Karnataka in general and farmers of Cauvery Delta in particular would have made benediction to them and stood with them like a solid rock. Apex court should have been convinced by the government of Karnataka about the plight of farmers and people of particular area who are facing acute scarcity of drinking water and irrigation for their withering crops. But the government miserably failed to do so. Even the Chief Minister could not show his courage for not implementing Supreme Court’s directives because of fear apprehension of losing his CM chair and to go to jail for contempt of court. Infact he should have sacrificed his CM’s post, but he scarified the interest of the State and its farmers to save his skin and his interests.
SRIDHAR V KULKARNI, Kalyan (West) 421 301
UPA graft quotient hits a new high with fresh disclosures on Walmart kick-backs(Organiser, 23.12.2012); This is with reference to the front page article in Organiser, ‘UPA graft quotient hits a new high with fresh disclosures on Walmart kick-backs’. After going through the text I am convinced that Walmart is the other name of ‘Fiscal Terrorism’. Just as for their political benefit the UPA is, promoting ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in the same way, since the general elections are coming nearer and nearer and to have ‘Political Donations’ from abroad UPA is now playing this foul game of killing ‘Indian Retail Trade’ and promoting ‘Foreign Retail Trade’. Walmart is a nefarious commercial enterprise known for bribing US Senate of $ 25 millons to lobby American law makers to access to overseas markets, including India. It has also received a flak of various allegations of underhand dealings across Mexico, Brazil and China. Just the way in the US downtown areas once blustering with retail shopping has turned into ghost towns, the same will be the fate of our retail hubs. Walmart is following the policy of ‘Hire and fire’, i.e it treats it employees very badly violating all human rights and trade union rights. This should not be allowed. Let us undo this. I request all the patriots to wake-up, unite and wage a war against those UPA traitors and strive for their political liquidation in the ensuing 2014 general elections to save our motherland and its glory.
PRAMOD PRABHAKAR VALSANGKAR, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad 500 060
Election Commission ‘on none to vote’ Election Commission in response to an RTI query has stated that it has forwarded recommendations to the Union government for amending relevant rules to include options for ‘none to vote’ in Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs)/ballot papers. Union government should take early decision in respect of this and other recommendations towards poll-reforms forwarded by the Election Commission from time to time. Rather since such recommendations from Election Commission usually keep pending for decades, system should be that Election Commission may directly forward its recommendations to both the Houses of Parliament through President who is also head of the Parliament. These recommendations maybe taken as approved by the Parliament if the Parliament does not vote against any of such recommendations. To induce unbias in the Election Commission, Election Commissioners should be appointed by consensus amongst Prime Minister and Opposition Leader in the manner Information Commissioners and Chief Vigilance Commissioner are appointed.
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL, 1775, Kucha Lattushah, Dariba Delhi:- 110 006
Comments