The Samsung Vs Apple War isn’t over yet
Thursday, May 19, 2022
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • RSS in News
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
SUBSCRIBE
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Sports
  • Business
  • More
    • RSS in News
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Obituary
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • RSS in News
  • Subscribe
Home General

The Samsung Vs Apple War isn’t over yet

Archive Manager by Archive Manager
Sep 3, 2012, 12:00 am IST
in General
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterTelegramEmail

The great Intellectual Property Conflict

Sarthak Shankar

Apple’s recent win against Samsung has been unanimously labelled as history in the making. And it is. But the question remains why? And is the judgement good or bad for the end consumer? And what does this mean for Android?

Before diving into the judgement a brief fact checking is in order. Android is an operating software made for smartphones. Google is the maker of Android and for all practical purposes responsible for it. Today Android is the most popular mobile OS. Actually Samsung recently became the world’s largest cell phone manufacturer thanks to, in no small part Android. So far so good.

But when Android was made, the then Apple CEO, Steve Jobs, said that Android was a rip-off from Apple’s iOS, and swore to do whatever it takes to stop it. But there was a problem with that idea. Android was- and still is-an open source project(i.e. anybody can download the OS and tweak it as they please). Meaning that legally speaking no one “owns” Android so Apple can’t sue anyone over it. What it can do, however, is sue companies for making devices that use Android and infringe upon Apple’s intellectual property. And that is how Samsung got mixed into a legal tussle with Apple. A tussle that’s been going on for over a year now. Android is ubiquitously used in Samsung smartphones, ranging from the Galaxy S3 to the Galaxy Y and in the many iterations of the Galaxy Tabs. The facts that Samsung is the largest smartphone manufacturer and that most of its products run Android means that Apple’s win in the US district courts is an indirect win against Android.

Apple claims that Samsung’s Galaxy S range of phones and the Galaxy 10.1 tablets “slavishly” copied the iPhone’s design and functionality and infringed on Apple’s signature patents (such as the bounce-back effect menus give when you reach the end of). This means that many features of the Galaxy line up are rip-offs of the iPhone. Apple contends that Samsung’s piracy cost them billions in lost sales. Apple further alleges that many consumers couldn’t differentiate between the two companies‘ devices and may have inadvertently bought a Galaxy tab or a Galaxy phone, when in fact they actually wanted to buy an iPad or iPhone. To be fair, Apple has become notorious for suing company after company. Deservedly or not, many consider this behavior uncompetitive.

Samsung says that it will appeal the court’s verdict, so the patent war isn’t over by a long shot. Samsung also says that the ruling gives an undue monopoly to Apple and reduces consumer choice that will lead to higher prices for the end user. Most likely, Samsung will now change the appearance of its Galaxy lineup to look less like the iDevices, which it did with the Galaxy Tab when the German courts had put a sales ban it. Existing users may get a software upgrade from Samsung that does away with the feature that infringes on Apple’s patents. Apple, is on the other hand trying to get a permanent sales ban on the Samsung phones that it feels infringes on Apple patents.

As far as the future of Android goes, while the win gives Apple fanboys and fangirls ammunition, its highly unlikely that future of Android is threatened. One of the major plus points of Android is hacking. Android is based on Linux kernels so it is meant to survive – in fact promote – the end user’s tinkering. Many consumers hack their phones to install custom features, even software upgrades that they want but companies don’t give them. The truth is that many global online communities exist solely for hacking Android phones. Two of the most popular ones, Cyanogenmod and MIUI, among which MIUI boasts bringing all the form and functions of iOS to just about any Android device. And they are beyond of the reach of Apple or its lawsuits.

While the court’s judgement and impartiality are beyond question, one would be remiss not to mention that any lay person can, in fact, differentiate between an iDevice and a Galaxy device. After all the companies‘ brand name and icons are as obvious as day on the body of the products. Another objection duly raised by Steve Dent from Endgadget is that some of patents granted are for features too small, meaningless to even qualify as “inventions.” The patents granted are too loosely defined. Lastly, its not as if everything Apple’s ever made has been original. The iOS 5’s update which brought a notification centre, widgets- in- notification- drawer and other goodies were too obviously inspired by Android (to paraphrase Steve Jobs, they were stolen from Android, but since Android is open-source, no one can sue Apple over it). The truth is that Android and Apple have competed and that has improved each other in remarkably short periods of time. So to quote Samsung Apple’s win should be counted “as a loss for the American consumer.”

(The writer is a student of Economics (Hons) in Delhi University and a keen watcher of the tech world)

ShareTweetSendShareSend
Previous News

Impressive win of ABVP in Rajasthan students’ union elections

Next News

A gateway to the world of music

Related News

Energy Transition in India: An Analysis

Leverage technology to ensure accessible, affordable and quality education for all: Dharmendra Pradhan

MHA did not freeze bank accounts of Missionaries of Charity (MoC), SBI informed MoC itself sent a request to SBI to freeze its accounts

Act to unify three municipal corporations of Delhi into one entity will come into force from May 22

Failure to understand ‘actual’ Pak designs led to ineffective war against terror

Political distress in Pakistan, a boon for terrorists

Goafest 2022 Celebrating ‘Superpower Within’

Goafest 2022 Celebrating ‘Superpower Within’

China forces Tibetan parents to learn Mandarin

Chinese authorities detain 170 Tibetans for opposing grazing land confiscation orders

Thirty-four ‘from outside J&K’ buy properties in new Union Territory

J-K: Not only humans, Pak sponsored terror didn’t spare even nature

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Energy Transition in India: An Analysis

Leverage technology to ensure accessible, affordable and quality education for all: Dharmendra Pradhan

MHA did not freeze bank accounts of Missionaries of Charity (MoC), SBI informed MoC itself sent a request to SBI to freeze its accounts

Act to unify three municipal corporations of Delhi into one entity will come into force from May 22

Failure to understand ‘actual’ Pak designs led to ineffective war against terror

Political distress in Pakistan, a boon for terrorists

Goafest 2022 Celebrating ‘Superpower Within’

Goafest 2022 Celebrating ‘Superpower Within’

China forces Tibetan parents to learn Mandarin

Chinese authorities detain 170 Tibetans for opposing grazing land confiscation orders

Thirty-four ‘from outside J&K’ buy properties in new Union Territory

J-K: Not only humans, Pak sponsored terror didn’t spare even nature

Taliban hijab decision might further strain engagement with the international community: UN

Afghanistan: UN female staff ‘directed’ to wear hijab at the office in Taliban’s newest decree

Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses grief over wall collapse tragedy in Gujarat, announces compensation

Prime Minister Narendra Modi expresses grief over wall collapse tragedy in Gujarat, announces compensation

Gyanvapi structure row: KVT trust chairman demands handover of Shivling to Kashi Vishwanath Temple

Gyanvapi structure row: KVT trust chairman demands handover of Shivling to Kashi Vishwanath Temple

Gujarat AIMIM leader Danish Qureshi arrested for disrespecting  Hindu Gods

Gujarat AIMIM leader Danish Qureshi arrested for disrespecting Hindu Gods

  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Special Report
  • Sci & Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Books
  • Interviews
  • Travel
  • Health
  • Obituary
  • Subscribe
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies