In a strong rebuttal to the opposition’s criticism, Kausar Jahan, the chairperson of the Delhi Haj Committee, defended the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, asserting that the proposed legislation will bring much-needed transparency and accountability to the functioning of Waqf Boards.
Addressing allegations that the bill encroaches on Muslim rights, Jahan emphasised that the amendments aim to address misuse and ensure proper management of Waqf-controlled properties.
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, which was introduced last year and subsequently referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for broader support, has sparked considerable debate across political and social spheres. Opposition parties have voiced concerns, claiming that the bill would infringe upon the rights of the Muslim community. However, Kausar Jahan, in her clarification, refuted these allegations, asserting that the bill would empower Waqf Boards to operate with greater transparency, ensuring that funds and resources benefit the underprivileged Muslim community they are intended for.
Jahan explained that the Waqf Boards were originally established to assist marginalised Muslims, but over time, they had been misused by a few individuals for personal gain. She cited the example of former chief Amanatullah Khan, whose tenure saw allegations of financial mismanagement, including the non-payment of salaries to imams and withheld widow pensions. Furthermore, she mentioned how the lack of transparency led to the appointment of relatives and friends of the chief, undermining the board’s purpose.
“The Waqf Board was meant to serve the community, but it has been misused by a few. The changes proposed in the bill will rectify this and ensure that the funds go where they are needed, with transparency and accountability at the forefront,” Jahan stated.
Jahan’s defense of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill comes at a time when the government is facing growing opposition. Critics have spread propaganda, falsely accusing the government of trying to control Waqf properties for political gains. However, Jahan emphasised that these changes are vital to realise the true intentions behind the establishment of Waqf Boards—helping underprivileged Muslims, not perpetuating cronyism and misuse. She called for a united approach towards supporting the amendments, urging people to look beyond political narratives and focus on the betterment of the community.
