Jammu and Kashmir Administration refuted the allegations of former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti regarding the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) scheme, saying that no outsider was being allotted land under the scheme.
Allegation made by Mehbooba Mufti
Mufti while addressing a press conference had alleged that Lieutenant-Governor Manoj Sinha’s recent announcement on providing land to homeless people under the PM Awas Yojana could be an attempt to alter the demography of Jammu and Kashmir. “The administration is importing slums and poverty into the region under the pretext of providing housing to homeless individuals, which I believe is an attempt to alter the demographic composition of Jammu and Kashmir,” the PDP chief had alleged.
J&K Administration Clears Air over Allegations Made By Mehbooba Mufti
In an official communique, the J&K administration said that the data quoted by Mehbooba Mufti pertains to Housing and Urban Affairs, whereas the PMAY G scheme falls under the Ministry of Rural Development for rural areas of J&K. It stated that the PMAY (Grameen) phase 1 commenced on 1st April 2016, during which 257,349 houseless cases were identified in J&K based on the SECC data from 2011, and after verification by Gram Sabhas, 136,152 cases were sanctioned for J&K under the overall commitment of the Prime Minister for “Housing for all by 2022”.
“Under the scheme, the Government of India provides a per unit assistance of 1.30 lakhs per house. The minimum size of the prescribed house is 1 marla,” the administration said.
The communique further said that the administration conducted the Awaas+ survey from January 2018 to March 2019 to identify beneficiaries who claimed to have been excluded from the 2011 SECC. The data collected through Awaas+ was used to bridge the gaps between the overall target and eligible beneficiaries provided by the SECC Permanent Wait List (PWL).
PMAY Phase-II (AWAS Plus) Grameen started from 2019 onwards, based on the survey conducted in 2018-19 across India, which recorded 2.65 lakh houseless cases in J&K. However, only a target of 63,426 houses was assigned to J&K.
“These houses were sanctioned in 2022. The current phase of the scheme will conclude on 31st March 2024. Due to J-K’s commendable performance in sanctioning and completing houses, on 30th May 2023, an additional 199,550 PMAY AWAS PLUS houses were sanctioned as a special dispensation to ensure housing for all 2.65 lakh homeless individuals who were part of the PWL 2019,” it said, adding that the survey follows clear guidelines, considering all homeless individuals, those living in zero, one, or two-room kachha houses, and prioritising based on the scheme guidelines’ defined criteria.
The administration further said that individuals who are homeless and do not possess land or clear land titles, or have land where construction is not permitted, cannot be sanctioned a house, even if they are part of the Permanent Waiting List.
“Based on the field-level survey, out of the 199,550 cases, 2,711 were identified as falling into categories such as people residing on State land, Forest land, Rakhs and Farms land where construction is not permitted, Custodian land, and land allotted to displaced people by the Government near Dachigam park for agricultural purposes, where construction is not allowed,” the J&K administration said.
The administration clarifies that it cannot sanction a house to individuals who do not possess the land. Therefore, to ensure housing for all, the administration has decided to allocate 5 marlas of land to these 2,711 cases so that they can have houses.
“Thus, Mehbooba Mufti’s statement alleging land allotment to over 2 lakh people is factually incorrect, and all her statements lack understanding of the PMAY scheme and the Revenue laws of J-K, which permit land allotment to landless individuals for housing purposes. No changes have been made to the law, and no outsider is being allocated land,” it added.
These 2,711 cases are part of the 2018-19 PWL of houseless individuals in J&K who were denied houses either because they didn’t possess land or the land they owned falls under the state, forest and other categories where construction is not permitted, it added.
[With Inputs from ANI]
