PM Modi Documentary: Delhi Court reserves order issue concerning service of summons as per Hague Convention
May 22, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
MAGAZINE
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS in News
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Organiser Weekly is Hiring!
Home Bharat

PM Modi Documentary: Delhi Court reserves order issue concerning service of summons as per Hague Convention

On the last date, BBC and Wikimedia Foundation had raised the point of jurisdiction before the Court. They also submitted that they had not been served properly as per Hague Convention as they are foreign entities

by WEB DESK
May 27, 2023, 04:00 pm IST
in Bharat, Delhi
Binay Kumar Singh, BBC

Delhi Court on issue of service of summons to BBC, other entities in consonance with the Hague Convention, in the defamation case against BBC documentary 'Modi: The India Question'

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

Delhi’s Rohini Court on Friday reserved an order on the point of service of summon to the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and other parties as per the Hague Convention. The court has reserved an order on this point for July 7. This matter pertains to the controversy over the documentary series “India: The Modi Question” which is banned in the country.

Additional District Judge (ADJ) Ruchika Singla reserved the order after hearing arguments on behalf of BBC (UK), Wikimedia and the Internet Archive. The court also heard the rebuttal arguments by the counsel for the plaintiff. The defendants are at liberty to file written arguments within 10 days, the court directed. The court is hearing a plea seeking a direction restraining the publishing of the BBC Documentary based on PM Modi.

The counsel for BBC submitted that BBC is a foreign entity and service should be served as per the Hague Convention. The counsel also submitted that the plaintiff had used different emails of the entity which is based in the UK. The other defendants Wikipedia Foundation and Internet Archive also adopted the arguments of counsel for BBC.

On the other hand, Advocate Mukesh Sharma, counsel for the plaintiff, argued that BBC (UK) is not a party in the suit. He has filed the suit against BBC India which is not a foreign entity. So there is no question following the process as per Hague Convention in the matter. He also submitted that the purpose of Summon is to make the party aware that a proceeding is in a court of law.

Also Read: Modi Documentary Row: Delhi High Court summons BBC in Gujarat NGO’s defamation suit seeking Rs 10,000 crore in damages

He also submitted that Wikimedia is cherry-picking the issue. The defendants had appeared in a matter in another court without raising the issue of the Hague Convention. In this sense, the summons has been served to the parties as their counsels have appeared before the court and have argued. During the hearing, an application was moved on behalf of Internet Archive for deletion of its name from the list of parties as it has removed the link to the content.

On the last date, BBC and Wikimedia Foundation had raised the point of jurisdiction before the Court. They also submitted that they had not been served properly as per Hague Convention as they are foreign entities.

Background

On May 3, the court issued a summon to these three organisations on a plea moved by Binay Kumar Singh. The court had also directed them to file their written statement within 30 days from the date of service of the summons.

Also Read: BBC Documentary: Delhi court summons UK broadcaster, Wikimedia and Internet Archives

The counsels for the BBC and Wikimedia Foundation had appeared in protest and submitted that they had not been served properly on May 11. The counsel also refused to accept the copy of the plea in the court.

The court noted, “Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 and 2 submit that they are appearing under protest as they have not been served properly as the defendant no. 1 and 2 are foreign entities. Further, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 and 2 submit that this court does not have the jurisdiction to try the present matter.”

Furthermore, the US-based digital library Internet Archive’s counsel informed the court that the BBC documentary had been removed from its platform. The court noted, “Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 3 submits that the content has already been removed by the defendant no. 3 and in case the plaintiff has any other objection regarding the same, the defendant no. 3 shall do the needful.”

The court noted, “Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 (BBC) submits that she has not received the copies as the service has not been effected properly upon the defendant no. 1. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff is ready to supply the copy in the court today, which is not accepted by Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 1 stating that the same shall be prejudicial to her rights in view of the Hague Convention. She needs time to argue on this point.”

Also Read: PM Modi Documentary: BBC and Wikipedia argue that Delhi Court lacks jurisdiction; Internet Archive removes documentary

The court noted in the order that the counsel for the plaintiff was ready to supply the copy in the court today, which is not accepted by the counsel for the BBC stating that the same shall be prejudicial to her rights in view of the Hague Convention.

Further, the copies are supplied to the counsel for Wikimedia but it was submitted by the Counsel that the same is also not as per law as per the Hague Convention, the judge noted in the order passed on Thursday.

The petitioner has moved a plea through social media lawyer advocate Mukesh Sharma. The petitioner Binay Kumar Singh has prayed the court to pass an order restraining the Defendants restraining them including their agents, etc. to cease the publishing of the two-volume documentary series “India: The Modi Question” or any other defamatory material pertaining to the Plaintiff, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) on the platforms of Wikimedia and Internet Archive or any other online or offline platforms.

The suit states that the allegations made in the documentary against the RSS and the VHP are motivated by malicious intent to defame the organizations and their members. Furthermore, it was alleged that the documentary had created an atmosphere of terror and fear and has the potential to trigger violence and jeopardize public order across the nation.

“The allegations made against the RSS and VHP are motivated by a malicious intent to defame the organisations and its millions of members/ volunteers. Such unfounded allegations are not only baseless but also have the potential to damage the reputation and image of the RSS, VHP and its millions of members/ volunteers, who have committed themselves to upholding the cultural, social and national values of India,” the suit said.

He has also sought to pass a direction to the Defendants ordering them to tender an unconditional apology to the Plaintiff as well as to RSS and VHP for the libellous and defamatory content published in the two-volume documentary series.

The petitioner has also sought damages of Rs 10 lakh from the defendants for alleged defamation caused by the documentary because he is also associated with RSS, VHP and BJP.

[with inputs from ANI]

Topics: PM Modi DocumentaryThe Modi QuestionHague ConventionMukesh SharmaDelhi CourtBBC RowBBCBBC documentaryBinay Kumar SinghWIKIMEDIAINTERNET ARCHIVERohini Court
Share7TweetSendShareSend
Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel
Previous News

Dr Vandana Das murder: Police have failed, family requested for CBI probe, says NCW chief

Next News

USA: Legislation introduced to declare Diwali as federal holiday

Related News

Media Bias and the Pahalgam Attack: A tale of selective outrage

Pakistan’s High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, Mohammad Faisal

Another admission by Pakistan: Pak envoy to UK claims, Pahalgam happened because ‘Kashmir is unresolved ‘

Rebutting the terminology used by NY Times, the US House Foreign Affairs
Committee Majority took a stand for truth; it corrected the newspaper by calling
the perpetrators as “terrorists” and not “militants”

Media Coverage of Pahalgam Terror Attack: Whitewashing terrorism in the name of Journalism

Delhi: Court upholds Medha Patkar’s conviction, confirms five-month jail term, Rs 10 lakh fine for defaming LG Saxena

Sharjeel Imam, accused in 2019 Jamia violence case

2019 Jamia Violence: Delhi court calls Sharjeel Imam ‘one of the kingpins’ in anti-CAA protests, charges framed

Representative image

Delhi Court questions police inaction against Netflix, X over alleged obscene content

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

U.S. Sustains Itself With Debt and Dollars, but For How Long?

IMF warns debt-ridden US: Every American owes 3118, total soars to 36.2 trillion dollars; Nation runs on printing money

Jasim Shahnawaz Ansari (Right)

Gujarat: Teen Jasim Shahnawaz Ansari arrested for launching 50+ cyber attacks during Operation Sindoor

Representative image

Karnataka: Congress Govt faces backlash over closure of Jan Aushadhi Kendras in Government hospitals

Karnataka Home Minister Dr G Parameshwara (Right)

Karnataka: Siddhartha Education Institutions of Home Minister G Parameshwara raided by ED

Representative image

J&K: Encounter breaks out between security forces and terrorists in Kishtwar

John Bolton said that Trump has a tendency of taking credit for everything.

“Nothing against India, just Trump being Trump,” Ex-US NSA on President’s role in India-Pakistan stoppage of fire

Pakistan High Commission in Delhi

Another Pakistan High Commission Official declared persona non grata amid spy probe in India

Bhagwat Swaroop ji

100th Birth Anniversary of Bhagwat Swaroop Ji – The Kashmir connection: A classic example of commitment & gentleness

All You Need to Know About Apara Ekadashi Vrat and Rituals on May 23

Jyestha Maas Apara Ekadashi on May 23: Astrologers recommend dual worship of Bhagwan Vishnu and Shukra

Dr. Malur Ramasamy Srinivasan, one of the tallest figures in India’s nuclear energy programme and former chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)

From Acharya Kanada to Dr M R Srinivasan: India bids farewell to the modern sage of atomic power at 95

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies