Current Issue
Organiser Home
Editorial
EXPOSE
Reports
Comment
The Moving Finger Writes
Media Watch
Thinking Aloud
Bookmark
A PAGE FROM HISTORY
RETROSPECT
Kids Org.
News Round-up
Readers’ Forum:
INTERESTING PEOPLE
PERSPECTIVE
Kerala Newsletter

Previous Issues
September 04, 2011

August 28, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 14, 2011
August 07, 2011

July 31, 2011
July 24, 2011
July 17, 2011
July 10, 2011
July 03, 2011

June 26, 2011
June 19, 2011
June 12, 2011
June 05, 2011

May 29, 2011
May 22, 2011
May 15, 2011
May 08, 2011
May 01, 2011

April 24, 2011
April 17, 2011
April 10, 2011
April 03, 2011

March 27, 2011
March 20, 2011
March 13, 2011
March 06, 2011

February 27, 2011
February 20, 2011
February 13, 2011
February 06, 2011

January 30, 2011
January 23, 2011
January 16, 2011
January 09, 2011
January 02, 2011

December 26, 2010
December 19, 2010
December 12, 2010
December 05, 2010
November 28, 2010
November 21, 2010
November 14, 2010
November 7, 2010

October 31, 2010
October 24, 2010
October 17, 2010
October 10, 2010
October 03, 2010

2010 Issues
2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues

Organiser
About us
Advertisement
Circulation
Contact us

Subscribe

December 31, 2006
Organiser Home
Editorial
Debate
News with a view
Controversy
Opinion
Defence Matters
The Moving Finger Writes
India That is Bharat
Readers’ Forum
Bookmark
Media Watch
Kids’ Org
News Analysis


December 31, 2006




Page: 6/27

Home > 2006 Issues > December 31, 2006

News with a view
By Vaidehi Nathan

French scientist gets her due, 200 years later

Emilie du Chatelet is not a familiar name. She was a great scientist of the 18th century. But her name remained anonymous because she was better than the men of her time. Voltaire, with whom she shared an intellectually invigorating relationship, shunned her when he realised that she had come up with new insights into the nature of light and was pursuing mathematical physics, a rather young science in the 1740s. The story of this extraordinary French woman has been documented by Davis Bodanis, an author who was intrigued by a footnote reference to Du Chatelet in a book he was reading. Du Chatelet after separating from Voltaire, met and fell in love with a young poet, by whom she conceived a child when she was 41. However, he did not take care of her. Throughout her pregnancy, she sat up till late in the night to finish a manuscript she was doing on Sir Issac Newton. She finished her text in August 1749, a few days later gave birth to a girl and within a few days both she and the child died. Though many young scientists used her theory for their work relating to energy and light, they did not acknowledge her contribution. She once remarked on her separation from Voltaire that it was preposterous to think that an intelligent woman needed a man to be happy. Is it her belief that cost her the right to fame?

Who fumes the most?

Americans are the loudest when it comes to preaching. Whether it is human rights, nuclear proliferation, harming environment or global warming. And routinely reports and studies reveal how they are the worst violators of each of these. According to a recent study by a watchdog group, Environmental Defence, Americans, who represent just five per cent of the world population, drive one third of the cars in the world. Worse, these account for half the harmful carbon emissions from vehicles globally. The passenger cars in the US are less fuel efficient than the others and emit nearly 15 per cent more carbon dioxide. A keenly assembled statistics reveal that the distance travelled by the Americans on shopping alone has increased 40 per cent in the last decade or so. The sports utility vehicles (SUVs) have outstripped the small cars in sales, drinking up more gallons of oil and coughing up more carbon dioxide into the air.

Computer blunder costs 400 million pounds

Failure to install a computer system to track down defaulters in fine payments has cost the UK exchequer 400 million pounds. A government report has admitted that the system, which was supposed to be in place to create a national database for court fine dues, may not be in place before 2008. Which means that till December 2007, the offenders who do not pay their court fines would not be tracked, as there is no system to transfer names from one area to another. The project, initially to have been operational in 1998 at a cost of 156 million pounds, would now cost nearly 490 million pounds. And according to an estimate, the court fine defaulters already owe the government over 400 million pounds. Project overruns and cost escalations are not the privilege of Indians it seems!




Previous Page Previous Page (5/27) - Next Page (7/27) Next Page


copyright© 2004 Bharat Prakashan(Delhi) Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Hosted by KSHEERAJA Web Solutions Pvt Ltd