As Bihar prepares for assembly elections, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has launched a loud campaign alleging “Vote Chori” (vote theft) in different states. Through press conferences, yatra, and social media, he has tried to portray the Election Commission of India (ECI) as a biased body working with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
However, a closer look shows that his campaign is not about protecting democracy but about spreading misinformation. His charges rely on false numbers, twisted facts, and scripted stories. Many of these claims have already been disproved by the ECI, independent data, and even by the very people whom Gandhi presented as “victims.”
This report lays bare the falsehoods driving Rahul Gandhi’s propaganda, explaining how each claim was made, how it was challenged, and what the truth actually is.
Lie 1: Voter list inflation in Maharashtra
Claim: Maharashtra’s electoral rolls list 9.7 crore voters, even though the state has only 9.54 crore adults.
Reality Check: The “9.54 crore” number came not from the Census or Election Commission but from Congress backrooms. Population projections are complex and fluctuate, especially in urbanising states. Notably, no Congress polling agent raised objections on polling day; all signed Form 17C without protest. Months later, Rahul Gandhi discovered “fraud.”
Truth: No evidence of voter list inflation. This was post-election excuse-making, not fact.
Lie 2: The myth of the ‘Turnout Surge’
Claim: A suspicious surge in voting took place after 5 PM in Maharashtra, indicating ballot stuffing.
Reality Check: ECI data proves the opposite, turnout slowed down post-5 PM, dropping from 58 lakh votes/hour earlier to 32.5 lakh/hour. Far from “late-night stuffing,” the data showed a natural decline.
Truth: A classic case of cherry-picking timing data to create a false narrative.
Lie 3: CCTV evidence was erased
Claim: Electoral CCTV footage was deliberately deleted to hide rigging in Maharashtra.
Reality Check: Storage rules for such footage were written under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, a law shaped by Congress itself. CCTV is preserved for 45 days and accessible only through judicial order. The Congress never filed any request to view the footage.
Truth: Rahul Gandhi blamed the ECI for following rules his own party helped frame.
Lie 4: The Karnataka “Vote Theft” drama
Claim: Rigging in BJP stronghold Mahadevapura enabled manipulation in Bangalore Central.
Reality Check: BJP’s win came from multiple segments (Rajaji Nagar, CV Raman Nagar, Gandhi Nagar), while Congress itself won four others (Shanti Nagar, Shivaji Nagar, Sarvagnanagar, Chamarajpet). The seat was a fair contest. When asked by the ECI to file a sworn declaration, Rahul Gandhi refused.
Truth: His silence was admission enough.
Lie 5: House Number Zero controversy
Claim: Rahul Gandhi alleged that the Election Commission was manipulating electoral rolls by assigning voters the address “House Number Zero,” suggesting this was evidence of irregularities and fraud.
Fact: The “House Number Zero” system was first introduced by the ECI in Delhi in 2013 as a special provision to include homeless citizens, people in shelter homes, and those without permanent housing into the voter list. To register, such individuals must fill out Form 6 and provide proof of residence in a shelter, along with their date of birth. A Booth Level Officer (BLO) then verifies the information before the entry is accepted. Many such voters have participated in elections since 2013, including the Delhi Assembly polls, Lok Sabha elections, and 2024 general elections. Some even use voter IDs with “House Number Zero” to link bank accounts.
Truth: “House Number Zero” is not a scam but a democratic inclusion measure created to ensure that even the homeless are not denied the right to vote. Rahul Gandhi’s claim ignores this decade-old policy and misrepresents a welfare-oriented provision as fraud, turning a social justice initiative into political propaganda.
Lie 6: Bihar’s voter cleanup maligned
Claim: The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar is a ploy to delete minorities from rolls.
Reality Check: The SIR process identified and deleted 65.2 lakh ineligible names, including 22 lakh dead voters, 35 lakh migrants, 7 lakh duplicates, and 1.2 lakh invalid entries. Not a single Congress Booth Level Agent filed an objection.
Truth: The “victim” of exclusion turned out to be a pawn in Congress’s scripted drama.
Lie 7: The Gurkirat Singh Dang Smear
Claim: Delhi resident Gurkirat Singh Dang held four voter IDs and voted multiple times.
Reality Check: A technical glitch had created four duplicate IDs, which were already under cancellation by the ECI. Dang himself went public, challenging Rahul Gandhi to prove that he voted multiple times. His sister accused Gandhi of breaching privacy.
Truth: What Gandhi cited as “proof” of rigging was an administrative error, one already fixed.
Lie 8: Double standards on defeat and victory
While Rahul Gandhi cries “fraud” in areas where Congress loses, constituencies like Shivaji Nagar, Chamarajpet (Karnataka), and Malegaon Central (Maharashtra), all Congress bastions, show abnormal spikes in voter rolls and duplicate entries. Yet the party never raises objections there. If elections are rigged, why did the BJP lose Himachal Pradesh by razor-thin margins? Why did the party stop at 240 seats nationally instead of sweeping beyond 400, as critics claimed?
Truth: Rahul Gandhi cannot accept that the people rejected his politics, not that their votes were stolen.
Lie 9: Ranju Devi’s ‘Missing Voters’
Claim: Ranju Devi initially said that six names from her household had disappeared from the electoral rolls. The claim was highlighted in front of cameras and the crowd, feeding into Rahul Gandhi’s accusations against the Election Commission of India (ECI).
Reality: Later, Ranju Devi herself admitted that she was misled by the local ward secretary into believing her family members’ names had been struck off. In reality, all the names of her family were very much present in the draft electoral list. Officials clarified that no deletions had taken place and that the confusion was created deliberately at the local level.
Lie 10: Comparing India to Bolsonaro’s Brazil
Rahul Gandhi likened India’s elections to Brazil under Jair Bolsonaro, suggesting “rigged elections” as part of global authoritarianism.
Reality Check: This rhetoric mirrors international destabilisation tactics, delegitimising election commissions, mobilising street protests, and inviting foreign interference.
Truth: A copy-paste playbook of chaos politics, not a defence of Indian democracy.
A propaganda of defeatism
During his Vote Adhikar Yatra rally in Gaya on August 18, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi openly threatened the Election Commission, saying the three Election Commissioners would be “dealt with” once the INDIA bloc forms the government at the Centre and in Bihar.
“All three Election Commissioners, listen up. Right now, it is Narendra Modi’s government, and you are working for him. But a day will come when the INDIA alliance will form the government… and then we will deal with all three of you. Action will be taken against you,” Gandhi declared.
He further accused the EC of involvement in “vote theft,” adding: “The Election Commission’s theft has been caught, and now it is asking me for an affidavit. Give me some time, the entire country will demand an affidavit from you. We will expose your theft nationwide.” The remarks came after the EC on August 17 asked him to submit a signed affidavit supporting his allegations or apologise.
Rahul Gandhi’s “Vote Chori” campaign is not about defending democracy; it is about manufacturing doubt to shield the Congress from electoral irrelevance. By undermining the ECI, maligning voter revision drives, and staging false testimonies, he seeks to erode faith in India’s democratic institutions.
The truth is stark: the so-called “vote theft” narrative is not a movement of the people but a political theatre of one man who refuses to accept the verdict of the people. India’s democracy, tested and resilient, deserves better than lies masquerading as activism.
Comments