In May 2025, India-Pakistan relations reached a critical juncture, marked by a surge in cross-border violence, temporary suspension of firing and renewed scrutiny of Pakistan’s military leadership. Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar’s candid remarks underscored India’s evolving security doctrine and its firm stance against state-sponsored terrorism.
The Pahalgam Attack: A Catalyst for Escalation
On April 22, 2025, a brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam, J&K, claimed the lives of 26 civilians, primarily Hindu tourists. The assailants reportedly verified the victims’ religious identities before executing them, indicating a deliberate attempt to incite communal discord and destabilize the region’s fragile peace. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar attributed the attack to the “extreme religious outlook” of Pakistan’s Army Chief, Asim Munir, suggesting a direct link between Pakistan’s military leadership and the perpetrators’ motivations.
Jaishankar emphasised that the attack aimed to undermine Kashmir’s tourism industry, a vital component of the local economy. By targeting tourists, the assailants sought to instil fear and disrupt economic stability. The minister’s assertion that such acts are influenced by Pakistan’s military leadership reflects India’s growing frustration with what it perceives as continued support for terrorism by Pakistan’s establishment.
In retaliation, India launched Operation Sindoor, a series of precision strikes targeting terrorist hideouts across the Line of Control. The operation signified a shift in India’s counter-terrorism strategy, focusing on proactive measures to neutralize threats at their source. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s declaration, “not blood, but sindoor flows in my veins,” underscored the operation’s symbolic significance and India’s resolve to protect its citizens.
Jaishankar clarified that while Operation Sindoor remained active in principle, it did not imply ongoing military engagement. The operation served as a deterrent, signalling India’s commitment to defending its sovereignty and responding decisively to acts of terror.
Following heightened tensions, India and Pakistan agreed to astop firing temporarily on May 10, 2025. Contrary to claims of international mediation, particularly by former US President Donald Trump, Jaishankar affirmed that the cessation of hostilities resulted from direct communication between the two nations’ military leadership. He stated, “We made one thing very clear to everybody who spoke to us, not just the US, but to everybody, saying if the Pakistanis want to stop fighting, they need to tell us. We need to hear it from them.”
This approach reflects India’s longstanding policy of resolving bilateral issues without third-party intervention, emphasizing sovereign decision-making and regional autonomy. By insisting on direct dialogue, India reinforced its position on managing conflicts through bilateral channels, thereby rejecting external influence in its diplomatic affairs.
Pakistan’s Military Involvement in Terrorism: A Persistent Concern
Jaishankar’s statements highlighted the pervasive role of Pakistan’s military in fostering terrorism. He asserted that the Pakistani army is “up to its neck” in supporting terrorist activities against India, noting that notorious terrorists on the United Nations sanctions list operate openly within Pakistan. These individuals are known to reside in major cities, with their addresses publicly acknowledged, yet they continue to function without restraint.
This assertion underscores India’s concerns regarding Pakistan’s failure to dismantle terrorist networks within its borders. The presence of such individuals in Pakistan not only threatens regional stability but also hampers efforts to establish lasting peace between the two nations.
The Pahalgam attack and subsequent military operations have had profound economic and humanitarian repercussions. Kashmir’s tourism sector, a significant contributor to the local economy, suffered a severe downturn as tourists fled the region, leading to widespread unemployment and financial distress among residents. The attack’s targeting of tourists was a calculated move to disrupt economic stability and instil fear, further exacerbating the region’s challenges.
Additionally, the Indian government’s decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty, a longstanding agreement governing water sharing between the two countries, signalled a strategic shift in response to Pakistan’s alleged support for terrorism. Prime Minister Modi declared that Pakistan would no longer receive water from rivers over which India holds rights, emphasizing that such measures were a direct consequence of Pakistan’s actions.
The events of May 2025 mark a significant turning point in India-Pakistan relations. India’s assertive response to the Pahalgam terror attack, through both military action and diplomatic channels, reflects a broader strategy to combat terrorism and uphold national security. By directly attributing responsibility to Pakistan’s military leadership and rejecting external mediation, India has reaffirmed its commitment to sovereign decision-making and regional stability.
The challenges ahead remain substantial, with the need for sustained efforts to dismantle terrorist networks and foster mutual trust. However, India’s decisive actions in the face of adversity demonstrate a clear resolve to protect its citizens and assert its position on the global stage.
Comments