Kamala Harris has become a significant liability for the Democrats, including influential figures like Barack Obama. The former president faced particular scrutiny following his October 10 address at a ‘Black Voters for Harris’ event, where he remarked that it was “not acceptable” for them to support Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
Barack Obama stated, “You’re thinking about sitting out or supporting somebody (former president Donald Trump) who has a history of denigrating you because you think that’s a sign of strength, because that’s what being a man is? Putting women down?” Expressing his dismay at Black voters, Obama remarked – “That’s not acceptable”.
This statement from Obama reflects the concerns of Democratic Party leaders about the possibility of voters’ rejection of Kamala Harris. Addressing the reluctance of Black voters to support Harris, Obama added, “You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses. I’ve got a problem with that”.
Why are even Democrats and Black voters hesitant to vote for Kamala Harris? The reason is simple. She has been one of the least effective vice presidents, and many Democrats did not agree with the decision to replace Joe Biden with her. A large segment of Black voters and Democrats wanted Michelle Obama to replace Biden instead. Barack Obama is fully aware of this. He knows that Kamala Harris cannot replace Joe Biden for several reasons.
Joe Biden served as vice president in the Obama administration, in addition to his extensive experience as a congressman and senator. Biden and Obama have a unique chemistry, something absent with Kamala Harris. Many Democrats view her as an opportunistic leader who rose to prominence more by leveraging personal relationships than through her skills and intellect.
Kamala Harris first reached her goal of becoming Attorney General by dating influential figures like San Francisco Democratic powerhouse Willie Brown and other key men. In the Biden administration, she has largely been seen as inactive under the guise of vice president. Over the past four years, she has not achieved any notable successes. Furthermore, Joe Biden has been entirely loyal to Obama, allowing the former president to effectively guide the presidency. This would not be possible with Kamala Harris in power, as she has her own agenda. Analysts believe a Harris presidency could lead to erratic, reckless, and self-destructive actions that could severely undermine America’s national interests and security.
Analysts further argue that the Democratic Party should have chosen Michelle Obama as their presidential candidate, as she is an even more powerful name than Hillary Clinton. While Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton have been embroiled in numerous scandals, Michelle Obama is seen as a stark contrast — one of the cleanest former First Ladies in US history.
Nevertheless, it is now too late for the Democrats to replace Kamala Harris with a better option, even though she is already considered a political liability — if not the most incompetent presidential candidate in US history.
For the Democratic Party, the November 5 elections will present several challenges. In addition to attempting to secure a victory for Kamala Harris — which may only be possible through significant election manipulation — they must also retain a majority in Congress and the Senate. To maintain control of Congress, Democrats have adopted a strategy of financing pro-Republican independent candidates to split votes. This approach was recently exposed when Thomas Bowman, an independent candidate in Minnesota’s 2nd Congressional District, suspended his campaign and endorsed his Republican rival after realising that Democrats had tricked him into running as a spoiler to divide the conservative vote.
Although Bowman withdrew, there are still numerous other candidates being used by Democrats to split Republican votes.
Meanwhile, Kamala Harris, who claims to be “African-American”, grew up with Marxist ideologies inherited from her parents — her father, Donald Harris, and mother, Shyamala Gopalan. Shyamala Gopalan, who came from Bharat to pursue doctoral work in endocrinology, met Donald Harris in small activist study groups that were part of the radical scene in Berkeley during the 1960s and 1970s.
According to Joe Schaeffer, the Black Panthers and Marxist revolutionary ideas were central to the Berkeley environment that Kamala Harris’s parents inhabited. Her parents regularly attended meetings of the Afro-American Association, which laid the foundation for the Black Panthers. Shyamala Gopalan was one of the few non-Black individuals allowed to attend, while whites were not welcome.
Both of Kamala Harris’s parents were far-left activists in the Berkeley-based Afro-American Association (AAA) in the early 1960s, an organisation that, according to a former member, looked to “Fidel Castro and Che Guevara” as heroes.
As documented by Corporate Watch, Kamala Harris owes her political career to an affair with San Francisco Democratic powerhouse Willie Brown. Brown, in turn, was connected with a variety of communist figures, from Fidel Castro’s Cuba to the infamous Rev. Jim Jones of Jonestown, and had a close alliance with Rose Pak, a woman who wielded considerable influence over the Chinese-American community in the Bay Area.
As a spiritual disciple of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara, Kamala Harris harbours a deep hatred for the United States’ “imperialist ideology”. She aspires to turn the country into something resembling Cuba or Venezuela, controlled by staunch communists. She would likely open the floodgates to migrants, especially from Cuba, Mexico, and Venezuela. Moreover, given the often symbiotic relationship between leftists, communists, and Islamists, Kamala Harris would also likely welcome Islamists from various countries.
She opposes capitalism and is expected to foster division within the country, possibly using caste-based census data — a strategy closely linked to George Soros’s agenda. Kamala Harris has enjoyed long-term financial and political support from Soros, and her rise is closely tied to organisations supported by his network, such as the powerful Democracy Alliance (DA). In this scenario, Soros appears intent on installing a puppet leader who will further his goals.
Commenting on a potential Harris presidency, Robert Spencer, Director of Jihad Watch, predicted that Harris would abandon Israel and side with groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and other enemies of the Jewish state.
In my view, as a trusted protégé of Soros, Kamala Harris will prioritise implementing Soros’s agenda, which includes creating chaos in India by manipulating caste issues and forming alliances with the Indian National Congress (INC) leadership, including Rahul Gandhi. She would work closely with the INC to topple Narendra Modi and empower various insurgent groups in northeastern and other regions of Bharat. Additionally, she would support Christian and Islamic missionary efforts in the country, which are of great importance to Soros.
The possibility of Kamala Harris becoming president raises serious concerns for many in the United States. Her political background, ideological influences, and controversial associations suggest that her leadership could steer the country toward instability, eroding its democratic foundations. With significant questions surrounding her competence and loyalty to American values, her potential presidency could create ripple effects far beyond the borders of the US, impacting global politics, national security, and the country’s internal unity. Under Kamala Harris, the United States could face a series of nightmarish scenarios. Her victory would herald the rise of fascism and the death of democracy in America.
