The recent decision by the Supreme Court to grant interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has brought into focus the broader question of how courts handle bail applications from politicians. This case serves as a pertinent example of the challenges the judiciary faces in balancing legal principles with political considerations.
The Case of Arvind Kejriwal:
Arvind Kejriwal’s interim bail in the money laundering case linked to the Delhi excise policy has sparked discussions on the judiciary’s approach to bail applications involving politicians. The Supreme Court granted Kejriwal interim bail till June 1, with a directive to surrender and return to jail by June 2. Despite senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi’s plea to extend bail till June 5, the Bench declined. Kejriwal must surrender by June 2 and is permitted to campaign but cannot fulfill his duties as Chief Minister.
The ED arrested Kejriwal on March 21 in connection with a money laundering probe relating to alleged irregularities in the now-scrapped Delhi excise policy 2021-22.
Historical Precedents: Looking back at past cases, there are notable instances where courts have taken a firm stance against granting bail to politicians facing legal scrutiny.
May 9, 2013: Supreme Court denied Jagan Reddy’s bail
On May 9, 2013, the Supreme Court refused to grant Jagan Reddy bail. Even though Jagan didn’t ask for bail to campaign for elections, his party, the Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party (YSRCP), accused Congress of plotting to prevent him from participating in the election campaign. The Supreme Court stated that economic offences are serious crimes and need to be treated differently when considering bail.
October, 2014: Karnataka High Court while denying bail to J Jayalalithaa
In October 2014, the Karnataka High Court rejected bail for J Jayalalithaa. The court stated that corruption violates human rights, causing economic turmoil and damaging the political system. Because of this, the court deemed Jayalalithaa’s case unfit for suspension of her sentence or granting bail.
October, 2014: High Court struck down bail to Ex-Haryana CM OP Chautala
OP Chautala, the leader of INLD and former Chief Minister of Haryana, surrendered to authorities. This happened after the Delhi High Court directed him to do so. The court accused Chautala of misusing his bail conditions by campaigning for assembly elections in the state. As a result, he had to surrender himself to comply with the court’s order.
February 8, 2002: Supreme Court refused to entertain Azam Khan’s bail pleas
The Supreme Court declined to consider SP leader Azam Khan’s requests for temporary bail. Azam Khan sought bail to engage in campaigning before the UP assembly elections. However, the court refused to entertain his pleas, indicating that Azam Khan’s requests were not taken into consideration.
May 10, 2024: Supreme Court disposes off Hemant Soren’s bail plea
The Supreme Court on May 10 disposed of a plea filed by former Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren seeking a direction to the High Court to deliver its verdict on his petition challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in a money laundering case.
Hemant Soren was arrested on January 31 this year in a money laundering case related to a land scam. After his arrest, he resigned as the Chief Minister of Jharkhand, and his loyalist Champai Soren was appointed as the new CM.
In conclusion, the case of Arvind Kejriwal’s interim bail provides a lens into the judiciary’s approach to bail applications by politicians, highlighting the delicate balance between legal procedures and political responsibilities.
Comments