Centre defends sedition law in SC, says it requires no reconsideration
September 27, 2023
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • International
  • More
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Politics
    • Vocal4Local
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
MAGAZINE
No Result
View All Result
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • International
  • More
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Politics
    • Vocal4Local
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Special Report
    • Culture
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
No Result
View All Result
Organiser
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • G20
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS in News
  • Magazine
Home Bharat

Centre defends sedition law in SC, says it requires no reconsideration

The Centre further stated that a three-judge bench cannot hear a legal challenge to the Constitutionality of Section 124A.

by WEB DESK
May 7, 2022, 11:00 pm IST
in Bharat
Representative Image

Representative Image

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

New Delhi [India]: The Central government has told the Supreme Court that the 1962 verdict of the five-judge Constitution bench case which upheld the validity of the offence of sedition under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, is binding and continues to be a “good law and needs no reconsideration”.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, in the written submissions, said that the 1962 five-judge bench judgement of the top court in Kedar Nath Singh v/s State of Bihar case which upheld the validity of Section 124A of IPC has stood the test of time and applied till date in tune with modern constitutional principles.

“It is a settled position in law that a judgment which withstood the test of time and has been followed not mechanically but in the context of changing circumstances cannot be easily doubted,” the Central government has submitted.

It said the 1962 verdict is a good precedent and that it requires no consideration and isolated instances of misuse cannot be a ground to uproot the precedent that has withstood the test of time for over six decades.

“The remedy would lie in preventing such abuse on a case-to-case basis rather than doubting a long-standing settled law declared by a Constitution bench since about six decades,” the Centre said.

The Centre further submitted that a three-judge bench cannot hear a legal challenge to the Constitutionality of Section 124A.

Only a bench of co-equal strength of Kedar Nath Singh can pose any doubts on the verdict, the Centre stated while adding that thus, for reconsideration of Kedar Nath Singh judgement, the matter will have to be referred to a bench of five judges or more.

It said, “The bench of three judges cannot reconsider the ratio of a Constitution bench without referring the matter to a larger bench. For a reference to a larger bench also it will be absolutely necessary for the bench of three judges to record its satisfaction that the ratio in Kedar Nath Singh (verdict) is so patently wrong that it needs reconsideration by a larger bench. The bench of three Judges cannot itself decide whether Kedar Nath Singh (verdict) is a good law or not.”

“The Kedar Nath Singh judgement has been the law of the land for more than six decades. The judgment balances constitutional rights and principles viz. needs of the State, to provide a reasonable interpretation,” it added.

The response of the Central government was filed on a batch of pleas challenging the constitutional validity of the sedition law.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana on May 5 said that it will first decide the issue of whether the petitions challenging the Constitutional validity of Section 124A to be referred to the larger bench or not.

The bench had posted the matter for hearing on May 10 for arguments on referrals of the petitions to the larger bench and had also granted the last opportunity to the Centre to file its affidavit on the pleas.

Earlier, Attorney General of India KK Venugopal had told the Supreme Court that the sedition law should not be struck down but there is a need for guidelines on this section. What is permissible and what is impermissible and what can come under sedition need to be seen, said Attorney General.

Venugopal while defending the constitutional validity of Section 124A and the Kedar Nath Singh judgement said that it is a well-thought-out one and needs to be upheld.

Venugopal had argued that the misuse of sedition law has been brought under control.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for one of the petitioners, submitted that many people are in jail due to the provision and it needs to be struck down since it was a colonial law to protect their rule in India.

He had added, “We are in free India and we are not serving any masters. Each day a journalist or someone else spends in jail due to this then how does it fair. We are not subjects of the crown anymore.”

Various petitions were filed in the apex court challenging the constitutional validity of sedition law. The pleas were filed by former army officer Major-General SG Vombatkere (Retd), former Union minister Arun Shourie, NGO PUCL, Editors Guild of India, and Journalists Patricia Mukhim and Anuradha Bhasin among others.

Last year, CJI Ramana questioned the Central government on the requirement of sedition law even after 75 years of independence and observed that it was colonial law that was used against freedom fighters.

While pointing out that sedition law was used against freedom fighters like Mahatma Gandhi and Bal Gangadhar Tilak, the apex court had asked Attorney General KK Venugopal, appearing for the Centre, why it can’t be repealed. It had observed that the Centre has repealed many stale laws and enquired why the government is not looking into repealing Section 124A (which deals with the offence of sedition) of the IPC.

It had further said that the court was concerned about the misuse of such laws. Chief Justice of India had also said that the apex court will look into the plea challenging the Constitutional validity of section 124A while adding that the “situation on the ground is grave… if one party does not like what the other is saying, Section 124A is used… It is a serious threat to the functioning of individuals and parties.”

CJI had said “use of sedition is like giving a saw to the carpenter to cut a piece of wood and he uses it to cut the entire forest itself”. The top court had further told Attorney General that the conviction rate under Section 124A is very low.

Major-General Vombatkere (Retd) challenged the Constitutional validity of the sedition law on the ground that it causes a “chilling effect” on speech and is an unreasonable restriction on free expression, a fundamental right.

Arun Shourie sought direction to declare the sedition law unconstitutional arguing that it is “heavily abused”. Shourie in his plea had said that cases are being filed against citizens for “exercising their freedom of speech and expression”. Section 124-A (sedition) under the IPC is a non-bailable provision.

Earlier, a different bench of the top court had sought a response from the Centre on a plea challenging the Constitutional validity of sedition law, filed by two journalists — Kishorechandra Wangkhemcha and Kanhaiya Lal Shukla — working in Manipur and Chhattisgarh respectively.. (ANI)

Topics: Supreme Court Of IndiaSedition Law
Share1TweetSendShareSend
Previous News

DMK attempt to stifle the voice of Vaishnavite Seer Sri Sadagopa Ramanuja Jeeyar

Next News

Devotees throng Badrinath Temple amid opening day rituals

Related News

Adani calls Hindenburg Report ‘Deliberate and Malicious Attempt’; SC report help rebuild investors confidence

Adani calls Hindenburg Report ‘Deliberate and Malicious Attempt’; SC report help rebuild investors confidence

“Those rejoicing over SC decision on ED director are delusional”:  Union Home Minister Amit Shah

“Those rejoicing over SC decision on ED director are delusional”: Union Home Minister Amit Shah

SC dismisses plea challenging RBI decision on Rs 2,000 note exchange sans proof

SC dismisses plea challenging RBI decision on Rs 2,000 note exchange sans proof

Sedition law is need of hour, required for integrity of country: Law Commission Chairman

Sedition law is need of hour, required for integrity of country: Law Commission Chairman

Recognising Same-sex relations as marriage: Need open debate for legislation; Judiciary has no role to play

Supreme Court dismisses plea claiming non-Tribals in ‘Scheduled Area’ are ‘unlawful occupants’; calls it “preposterous”

Adani-Hindenburg row: Supreme Court to hear SEBI plea seeking time extension for probe into Hindenburg report today

Adani-Hindenburg row: Supreme Court to hear SEBI plea seeking time extension for probe into Hindenburg report today

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Pragjyotishpur Literature Fest: Exploring North-East  through lenses of culture, history, and ethos

Pragjyotishpur Literature Fest: Exploring North-East through lenses of culture, history, and ethos

Madhya Pradesh: Stalker Sameer Khan, at gunpoint told a minor Hindu girl, “Convert and Marry me or get killed”

Madhya Pradesh: Stalker Sameer Khan, at gunpoint told a minor Hindu girl, “Convert and Marry me or get killed”

Hoysala Temple: Visitors hail presevation of iconic Hindu heritage site that made its way to UNESCO World Heritage List

Hoysala Temple: Visitors hail presevation of iconic Hindu heritage site that made its way to UNESCO World Heritage List

ISRO Chief sees potential in space sector beyond just building rockets, satellites

ISRO Chief sees potential in space sector beyond just building rockets, satellites

MP Shocker: A raped, half-naked and bleeding minor seeks help in the streets of Ujjain but is shunned away

MP Shocker: A raped, half-naked and bleeding minor seeks help in the streets of Ujjain but is shunned away

Punjab: NIA crcakdown on Khalistanis continues; pick up aide of gangster Arsh Dala in ongoing raids

Punjab: NIA crcakdown on Khalistanis continues; pick up aide of gangster Arsh Dala in ongoing raids

Raja Rammohan Roy Death Anniversary: London Post a Bristol tribute

Raja Rammohan Roy Death Anniversary: London Post a Bristol tribute

PM Modi releases 4 books showcasing the success of India’s G20 Presidency

PM Modi releases 4 books showcasing the success of India’s G20 Presidency

USA: BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha to inaugurate ‘second largest Hindu temple’ in New Jersey

USA: BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha to inaugurate ‘second largest Hindu temple’ in New Jersey

Madhya Pradesh: President Droupadi Murmu attends India Smart Cities Conclave 2023 in Indore

Madhya Pradesh: President Droupadi Murmu attends India Smart Cities Conclave 2023 in Indore

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies