Rahul Gandhi bats for Marital Rape Law, netizens remind him UPA 2 had rejected the proposal!
July 12, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
MAGAZINE
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Op Sindoor
  • More
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • RSS in News
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS in News
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Rahul Gandhi bats for Marital Rape Law, netizens remind him UPA 2 had rejected the proposal!

by WEB DESK
Jan 18, 2022, 06:34 pm IST
in Bharat, Delhi
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

The Justice Verma Committee had recommended special provisions for Marital Rape but the UPA 2, led by the Congress party, had rejected the proposal.

New Delhi: In the ongoing debate about marital rape, Nehru family scion and former Congress president Rahul Gandhi batted for making special provisions for marital rape.

In a social media post on Sunday (January 16), Rahul Gandhi said “Consent is amongst the most underrated concepts in our society. It has to be foregrounded to ensure safety for women. #MaritalRape”

The Justice Verma Committee, which was constituted in the wake of the Nirbhaya gangrape to suggest changes in the laws to check sexual assault, had recommended making marital rape an offence under IPC. The Committee had submitted its report on January 23, 2013.

The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government at the centre led by the Congress Party had rejected the suggestion of the committee.

Rahul Gandhi’s mother and president of the Congress party, Sonia Gandhi, was the chairperson of the UPA.

Commenting on the post of Rahul Gandhi, scientist and political commentator Dr. Anand Ranganathan said “Back in 2013 your own UPA government, going against the advice & recommendation of the Justice JS Verma committee, REFUSED to make Marital Rape an offence, saying: "Such a provision may weaken the institution of marriage in India." What a shameless hypocrite you are.”

Many prominent voices have been speaking against this. Replying to Rahul Gandhi, noted lawyer and social activist Monika Arora said “If Mother & father sleep together at night, have sexual relations but mother cries RAPE in morning, father will be in prison for 10 years. No bail.

-No police investigation can help.

-Life of Children,old parents, unmarried Bros or sis will be ruined.

-Think before U speak”

She further added “114A. Evidence Act- In prosecution for rape under sec.376 IPC, where sexual intercourse by accused is proved & question is whether it was without consent of woman & she states in Court that she did not consent, Court shall presume that she did not consent.

-Man has no defence….”

Analysing the Justice Verma Committee report, PRS Legislative Research wrote “Under the IPC sexual intercourse without consent is prohibited. However, an exception to the offence of rape exists in relation to un-consented sexual intercourse by a husband upon a wife. The Committee recommended that the exception to marital rape should be removed. Marriage should not be considered as an irrevocable consent to sexual acts. Therefore, with regard to an inquiry about whether the complainant consented to the sexual activity, the relationship between the victim and the accused should not be relevant.”

The Parliamentary Standing Committee too had rejected the recommendation.

The Delhi High Court is currently hearing a bunch of petitions about rape in marriage. On the notice issued to it, the Union government had asked for more time to respond.

ShareTweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

Prime Minister Modi interacts with Varanasi BJP workers through NaMo app, discusses women empowerment, farmers’ welfare

Next News

The ‘Crypto Christian’ Judge who was not named In the Madras High Court’s judgment

Related News

Digital India Foundation flags security threat over Pakistan bid to join global AI Alliance Network (AIANET)

Digital India Foundation flags security threat over Pakistan bid to join global AI Alliance Network (AIANET)

National Security Adviser Ajit Doval attends the 62nd Convocation of IIT Madras

Tamil Nadu: Ajit Doval rips into foreign media over Operation Sindoor narrative

Andhra Pradesh: Kamalananda Bharati Swamiji set to commence padayatra to strengthen dharmic and temple centric society

Shubhranshu Singh joins Inaugural Board of Effie LIONS Foundation, to represent India and South Asia

Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha

J&K: LG Manoj Sinha lashes out at those spreading false, misleading narratives similar to that of terror organisations

Celebrating Aurangzeb? Why India urgently needs genocide memory laws

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Digital India Foundation flags security threat over Pakistan bid to join global AI Alliance Network (AIANET)

Digital India Foundation flags security threat over Pakistan bid to join global AI Alliance Network (AIANET)

National Security Adviser Ajit Doval attends the 62nd Convocation of IIT Madras

Tamil Nadu: Ajit Doval rips into foreign media over Operation Sindoor narrative

Andhra Pradesh: Kamalananda Bharati Swamiji set to commence padayatra to strengthen dharmic and temple centric society

Shubhranshu Singh joins Inaugural Board of Effie LIONS Foundation, to represent India and South Asia

Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha

J&K: LG Manoj Sinha lashes out at those spreading false, misleading narratives similar to that of terror organisations

Celebrating Aurangzeb? Why India urgently needs genocide memory laws

A representative image

Breaking Barriers: 1.38 Lakh tribal students to get JEE/NEET coaching, skills, jobs under new govt-industry partnership

MEA slams Punjab CM Bhagwat Mann

AAP in dock over foreign policy fiasco: Global Gaffe by Bhagwant Mann and diplomatic damage control by Bharat

US President Donald Trump

The saga of ‘Trumponomics’: A trajectory of economic impediments and geopolitical complications

Mazar built over dog’s grave demolished

Uttar Pradesh: Yogi government’s bulldozer action in Sambhajinagar: Mazar built over dog’s grave demolished

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
    • Global Commons
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS in News
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
    • Podcast
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies