Gandhiji-Guruji Convergence (Organiser, 17.3.2013); This refers to ‘Gandhiji-Guruji Convergence’ by S Gurumurthy in Organiser. He has quoted so many good things about cow and against cow slaughter as told by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi from time to time. If Gandhi was really truthful, why he refused bluntly cow protection, soon after Partition of India, when he received thousands of telegrams from the public for banning cow slaughter. In his prayer speech on November 4, 1947, he said “Was India to be a theocratic state, and were tenets of Hindus to be imposed on non-Hindus?” (See page 139-140 Delhi Diary). Here Gandhi is trying to cheat the Hindus. No body asked that Muslims should worship cow. They were simply asked for banning cow slaughter. And what meaning Gandhi’s worship of cow had, if he did not want to ban cow slaughter. Secondly, no body asked to treat Muslims as second class citizens or send them to Pakistan, although they had created their separate homeland and had no right to live in India. How, simply banning of cow slaughter, makes India a theocratic state? Is cow slaughter essential part of secularism? What is the meaning of Ahimsa, so often preached by Mr MK Gandhi? Such bad and stupid arguments were meant to befool and cheat the Hindus and appease the Muslims, even after giving them Pakistan. Crores and crores of cows have been slaughtered since 1947, and Gandhi has to own the sin for it. This is only one example. Throughout his life he lied and cheated the Hindus. It is a sin to praise Gandhi, and an insult to Guruji to find similarity of thoughts with Gandhi. In the entire history, no individual had done so many sins against the Hindus, as have been done by Gandhi.
72/Sector-8, Panchkula-134 109
Why are Jews so powerful? (Organiser, 24.2. 2013); This is with reference to Dr. Farrukh Saleem’s article, entitled: ‘Why are Jews so powerful?’ in Organiser. Dr Farrukh’s article is thought provoking and he has simply put a question mark over Muslims not winning Nobel Prize as Jews did in the past 105 years.
SHAKIL AHMED, 22-7-313, Chatta Bazar, Hyderabad-500 002
Bleeding hearts cry for mercy for Sanjay convicted in Mumbai serial blasts (Organiser, 7.4.2013); This refers to the remarks of Digvijay Singh, that Sanjay Dutt is a renowned actor and not a terrorist and therefore should be pardoned. Who says that Sanjay Dutt was not directly involved in the 1993 serial bomb blast in Mumbai? It is a fact that he possesed arms and ammunitions including AK-56 which was a part of the consignment of the bombs blasted in the serial blasts in Mumbai. Hence it is quite evident that he had supported the group which was directly involved in the serial blasts,which is no less than a criminal offence and equivalent to that of a terrorist's act. Perhaps, since Sunil Dutt was a Congress-I MP, Digvijay Singh is blindly supporting his son Sanjay Dutt. Compared to others who are also accused under the same charges and facing life imprisonment, Sanjay Dutt being a celebrity must realise that enough lenience has been showered on him to undergo only five years of imprisonment. This concession is itself a pardon. However, if he is still pardoned his remaining three and half years of imprisonment,then this can be no less a mockery of the judicial system of our country.
SETURAM ASPARI, email:[email protected]