Rape of democracy by UPA Sunday is the only day on which an ordinary newspaper reader can afford to spend some time in reading any Sunday story flashed by a newspaper. One such Sunday story published by Sunday Express dated March 24, 2013, is captioned “ MHA agrees to special courts for Muslims ‘falsely held’ in terror cases”. In other words, it appears that, the courts are directed to assume that the Muslims (and not the non-Muslims) held in terror cases are being held falsely, even at the outset of the trial. It also means that the onus of the proof lies with the prosecution and alleged culprit is free to keep his mouth shut, provided he is a Muslim! While the leaders of the so-called Indian National Congress loudly claims to the world, that the terror has no religion, we fail to understand why a special court should be instituted, exclusively for dealing with Muslims accused of terror. Is it not enough for the so-called Indian National Congress to talk vociferously about the virtues of secularism. Their sense of secularism should be uncompromisingly honest and sincere, irrespective of caste, colour, creed or religion. Nationalists of this country would like to remind pseudo- secularists of all hues that there is no such thing as Hindu terror or Muslim terror so far as terrorism is concerned. Rape of democracy is a rape, irrespective of whether it is committed in the name of emergency or pseudo- secularism!
KS IYER, Delhi
Foreigners come here to loot, not save us (Organiser, 10.3.2013); This refers to ‘Foreigners come here to loot, not save us’ by Dr Jay Dubashi in Organiser. He has mentioned various wrongs done by foreigners. However calling Lord Mountbatten “as the last rascal, who cut not only our throats but also our country all the time using his wife to ensnare our leaders” is uncharitable. It seems that Dr Dubashi has blamed Lord Mountbatten, only to hide the sins of Gandhiji and Jawaharlal Nehru. Very shameful indeed. Lord Mountbatten was a very reasonable person and Hindus should be thankful to him, mainly for two reasons. Firstly, when he took over as Viceroy thousands of Hindus had been killed and were being slaughtered in Bengal and West Punjab, as a result of “Direct Action” called by Jinnah and Muslim League to attain Pakistan. Gandhiji, Nehru and Congress leaders were least bothered about the killings and loot of Hindus by the Muslims. Infact Gandhiji was of the firm opinion, that Hindus have no right to retaliate in self-defence, and should accept their death with honour as “no training is required for dying”. Here it would be quite relevant to mention, that once KM Munshi asked Gandhiji, that the Hindus should have the right to retaliate in self-defence, when attacked by Muslims. Gandhiji replied that, such persons should leave the Congress. When Sardar Patel proposed Munshi’s name for Governorship of West Bengal after Partition in 1947, Mahatma felt that his i.e. Munshi’s reputation of being unsympathetic to Muslims disqualified him (see page-139-140 The Rajaji Story 1937-72—by Rajmohan Gandhi, Published by Bharatiya Vidya Bhawan—Bombay—1994). Thus Gandhiji, was concerned only about the wellbeing of those Muslims in Calcutta and West Bengal, who had slaughtered thousands of Hindus. It is also a historical fact, that Gandhiji, Nehru, Patel and Congress leaders showed little interest towards the plight of the Hindus and Sikhs left in Pakistan, and lakhs of them were murdered. To prevent killing of Hindus and Sikhs, Lord Mountbatten prepared the Partition Plan, and convinced Gandhiji and Nehru to agree with Pakistan as homeland for the Muslims and truncated India as homeland for the Hindus (and Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, etc.). Many British writer have mentioned truncated India as Hindu dominion in their books on this subject. Even Jinnah was of the view, that after creation of Pakistan as homeland for the Muslims, the remaining ‘Hindustan’ would be the homeland for the Hindus. It were only Gandhiji, Nehru, Patel and Congress leaders, who intentionally and sinfully prevented truncated India to become a homeland—a safe place for the Hindus. Lord Mountbatten convinced Jinnah, that Pakistan cannot be given Hindu majority regions of Punjab and Bengal, as Hindus have the right to join India, just as the Muslims are joining Pakistan. Jinnah wanted whole of Punjab and whole of Bengal and Assam. Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi had 14 meetings with Jinnah in 1944 at Bombay, but could not convince him on this issue. Hindus must be grateful to Lord Mountbatten and not to Gandhi and his followers.
ANAND PRAKASH, 72/Sector-8, Panchkula-134 109
Sri Lankan Tamils issue This refers to the DMK Chief MK Karunanidhi’s threat to withdraw his support to the UPA government, if India does not support the cause of Sri Lankan Tamils in UNHRC. It is these people who have been hijacking and blackmailing not only UPA government but also our Indian Union since Independence irrespective of who is the Prime Minister or which political party is ruling the Government at the Centre. This is not the only issue, but we can see dozens of them including Cauvery issue, Mullaperiya Dam, Setusamudra project, preference in various mega projects, ministerial portfolios, political influences and many more. It is these people who tried to secede from the Indian Union and make their own country in the name of ‘Dravidnad’ and even tried to include forcibly other states of South India including the Tamil population in Sri Lanka, then, under the leadership of Ramaswamy Periyar, but failed miserably. It is these people, right form our country’s Independence upto this day have expressed their dissatisfaction of being in the Indian Union and showed unpatriotism towards our country and always waited for a suitable opportunity to secede from Indian Union to make their own home country. History also says that they have always been hostil towards rest of India since millennium. When Sri Lanka is an independent country, how can anybody interfere and exert pressure on their internal matter of their country affairs. We have huge Indian origin population worldwide, such as in Malaysia, Middle-East, Australia, many African coutries. And just because Sri lanka, which is peaceful country and not indulging in any terrorist activity and is our immediate neighbour, we cannot take things for granted. Do we dare to interfere in our other neighbouring countries like Bangaladesh or Pakistan, where our Indian origins are humiliated many times more than Sri Lankan Tamils. We appeal to Indian Union to not to take any haste decision in this matter and maintain enough of diplomacy and protocol in UNHRC.
SETURAM ASPARI, email: [email protected]
