Current Issue
Organiser Home
The Moving Finger Writes
Media Watch
Thinking Aloud
Kids Org.
News Round-up
Readers’ Forum:
Kerala Newsletter

Previous Issues
September 04, 2011

August 28, 2011
August 21, 2011
August 14, 2011
August 07, 2011

July 31, 2011
July 24, 2011
July 17, 2011
July 10, 2011
July 03, 2011

June 26, 2011
June 19, 2011
June 12, 2011
June 05, 2011

May 29, 2011
May 22, 2011
May 15, 2011
May 08, 2011
May 01, 2011

April 24, 2011
April 17, 2011
April 10, 2011
April 03, 2011

March 27, 2011
March 20, 2011
March 13, 2011
March 06, 2011

February 27, 2011
February 20, 2011
February 13, 2011
February 06, 2011

January 30, 2011
January 23, 2011
January 16, 2011
January 09, 2011
January 02, 2011

December 26, 2010
December 19, 2010
December 12, 2010
December 05, 2010
November 28, 2010
November 21, 2010
November 14, 2010
November 7, 2010

October 31, 2010
October 24, 2010
October 17, 2010
October 10, 2010
October 03, 2010

2010 Issues
2009 Issues
2008 Issues
2007 Issues
2006 Issues

About us
Contact us


August 12, 2007
Organiser Home
Kokatta Newsletter
Media Watch
The Moving Finger Writes
World of Women
Book Reviews
Readers’ Forum
Sangh Samachar
News Analysis
Media Watch
Think It Over

August 12, 2007

Page: 30/35

Home > 2007 Issues > August 12, 2007

Think It Over

Being wiser after the event

By M.S.N. Menon

We all become wiser after the event. More so, after a great event of history. Such was the case with the Partition of the country.

Yet so little has been written on the matter by the Indian historians! We all want to know why? The usual reply is: India has no tradition in history, that it is averse to tragedy and, wasn?t it all a painful memory, we are asked. But let us not rush into conclusions. It is true India has no detailed knowledge of history like the Jews or the Chinese. But attempts have been made to write history. And India avoids tragedy, because it is a principle with it. Yet India is also the creator of the greatest tragic epic?the Mahabharata. It is not only history but also great literature.

Neglect of history meant loss of memory of the most serious events of history. Thus, India failed to remember the invasion of Alexander and the devastation caused by the early Muslim invasions! We have profited least from historical knowledge.

Prof. Ashish Nandi bemoans: How could Indian historians be so indifferent to the repeated invasion of a huge continent by a few hundred well-armed horsemen? And how can they remain indifferent to the 800 years of Muslim rule over the Hindus? Of course, a study of this kind would have brought swift punishment if the Muslim rulers were around. But what happened under the British rule, when they were free to work and think? Nandi?s questions remain unanswered!

I have also raised some questions. But I have not found replies to them in any of the works of the Indian historians. I want to know why the Congress allowed the Muslims of South India, East India, West India and the Himalayas to join the agitation for Pakistan? Of course, they (Muslims) had every right to do so. But there was a price: They had to leave India for Pakistan.

Gandhiji should have told them that they would be deported on Indian independence if they continued to support Pakistan. And he should have set up a watch-dog committee to monitor the Muslims. If Gandhiji had issued such a statement, the Pak movement would have probably collapsed for want of popular backup. I am intrigued why this was not done. But one can guess: Gandhiji?s opposition to Partition! Gandhiji assumed that Partition would never take place.

I say this from my childhood experience in Kerala. (I was born in the early twenties of the last century). The Gandhians were already at work?for example on Hindi prachar. My uncle was not only one of the principal Hindi teachers of the region, but also a functionary of the Hindi Prachar Sabha. Though I hardly understood anything, I watched with interest, more so when the Muslims began to take out processions. They shouted: ?Pakistan Zindabad!?

At that time all this meant nothing to me. But as I grew up, I asked may uncle whether the Muslims of Kerala would go to Pakistan? Of course, not, he said. ?Then why are they lending their help to divide their country?? He made some reference to Gandhiji?s policies. I was never happy with it.

Dear reader, are you among the feet touching people? I am not. I do recognise that there are great men and men of eminence like Vivekananda, the Mahatam and Aurobindo. They were worthy of reverence. The rest of the Gandhians were all, like all of us, made of clay. By bending before them, by touching their feet, we made them into demigods?men of great wisdom and knowledge. That is where we made the most serious mistake. We thought that they could handle the question of Partition. I am now convinced that neither the Hindu leaders nor the Muslim Leaguers knew how to handle Partition. And since Gandhiji ruled out Partition, many attractive schemes based on Partition where not even thought of. Once Partition became the only option before the country, Gandhiji was the most confused man in India. He had never allowed people to think of working out the best Partition scenario. No wonder, he ran away. If the Congress had been a rational organisation, it would have had with it a dozen sophisticated plans for the Partition of the country.

Previous Page Previous Page (29/35) - Next Page (31/35) Next Page

copyright© 2004 Bharat Prakashan(Delhi) Ltd. All Rights Reserved
Designed and Hosted by KSHEERAJA Web Solutions Pvt Ltd