The decision by Vijayapura district authorities to bar Kadasiddheshwara Swamiji of the Kolhapur–Kaneri Mutt from entering the district for two months has sparked a sharp political backlash, with Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka accusing the Siddaramaiah government of muzzling Hindu religious leaders.
Deputy Commissioner Dr. Anand K. issued the order on Friday, prohibiting the Swamiji from entering Vijayapura district from October 16 to December 16. Officials said the directive was prompted by police intelligence suggesting that the seer could be targeted after a recent event in neighbouring Maharashtra, where he reportedly made highly provocative and derogatory remarks about Lingayat seers and the Chief Minister.
At a public function in Bilur, Jath taluk (Maharashtra), the Swamiji identified in the order as the Kolhapur–Kaneri Kadasiddheshwara seer is reported to have criticised the Basava culture festival and used language that many found insulting to religious leaders and traditions. According to the extract cited by authorities, the Swamiji allegedly described those organising the festival as “artists of a drama board” and used disparaging expressions about worship, temples and religious custodians. Local protests and strong reactions from Lingayat organisations followed the speech, raising fears of law-and-order disturbances.
In response to the ban, R. Ashoka slammed the state government in strident terms. Posting on social media and speaking to reporters, the senior BJP leader accused the Congress administration of indulging in a pattern of suppressing the voices of Hindu gurus. “The Congress government’s ban is a blessing! Instead of defending freedom of speech, this administration has once again embarked on the misadventure of gagging religious leaders,” Ashoka said, alleging that the government had previously targeted other seers and filed FIRs in sensitive matters. He demanded that the state respect constitutional freedoms while asserting that provocative speech must be handled through legal due process, not blanket exclusions.
ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ನಿಷೇಧ ಭಾಗ್ಯ!
ಕೊಲ್ಹಾಪುರ-ಕನೇರಿ ಕಾಡಸಿದ್ದೇಶ್ವರ ಮಠದ
ಶ್ರೀ ಅದೃಶ್ಯ ಕಾಡಸಿದ್ದೇಶ್ವರ ಸ್ವಾಮೀಜಿ ಅವರನ್ನು ಎರಡು ತಿಂಗಳವರೆಗೆ ವಿಜಯಪುರ ಜಿಲ್ಲೆಗೆ ಬರದಂತೆ ನಿರ್ಬಂಧ ಆದೇಶವನ್ನು ಹೊರಡಿಸಿರುವ ರಾಜ್ಯದ ಲಜ್ಜೆಗೇಡಿ ಕಾಂಗ್ರೆಸ್ ಸರ್ಕಾರ, ಮತ್ತೊಮ್ಮೆ ಹಿಂದೂ ಧರ್ಮ ಗುರುಗಳ ದನಿಯನ್ನ ಅಡಗಿಸುವ ದುಸ್ಸಾಹಸಕ್ಕೆ ಕೈಹಾಕಿದೆ.… pic.twitter.com/UWEfT0dAwu— R. Ashoka (@RAshokaBJP) October 16, 2025
Police sources, however, defended the order as a preventive step. A senior official said the directive was aimed at maintaining peace in Vijayapura, a district that witnessed protests, effigy burnings and heightened communal tensions after Swamiji’s remarks were publicised. “Our immediate concern is public safety and preventing any incident that could spiral into violence,” the official said, adding that the ban was issued under provisions that allow the administration to impose restrictions to avert law-and-order problems.
The move has split opinion across political and religious lines. Few Lingayat leaders and local community groups welcomed the ban, saying it was necessary to prevent the “incitement and insult” of their religious figures. “Insults and calls for physical reprisals against our gurus cannot be tolerated,” said one Lingayat activist, requesting anonymity. At the same time, some civil liberties advocates cautioned that preventive bans must be proportional, time-bound and legally sound, warning against executive overreach in matters concerning speech and movement.
Administratively, the Vijayapura order cites the immediate threat perception and the need to protect public order during the sensitive period encompassing the seer’s proposed visit to Basavana Bagewadi on October 16-17. Authorities said they would monitor the situation closely and deploy adequate security to prevent any untoward incident.
Officials also made it clear that the ban is not intended as criminal punishment but as a temporary, preventive measure. If the Swamiji or his followers wish to seek relief, they may approach the appropriate legal forum. Conversely, anyone believed to have committed offences, whether for hate speech or incitement to violence, will face investigation and due process under the law.
Comments