The centenary of the RSS is not just a milestone for an organisation but a testament to a civilisational idea that has endured and expanded through adversity. Over centuries, Hindu society—buffeted by invasions, colonial subjugation, and internal discord—had struggled to sustain an institution of scale and continuity. Temples were razed, kingdoms rose and fell, reform movements emerged and disappeared. Yet over the past hundred years, the RSS has created and preserved that very continuity. Its longevity invites deeper thought. One reason is how the RSS was conceived. Established in 1925 amid the heat of India’s independence struggle, it was not structured around a single charismatic leader. Though K. B. Hedgewar inspired many, he consciously avoided making the organisation a vehicle for personal authority.
In contrast, many social movements from that era (and earlier) depended on their founders’ personalities—thriving when they were alive, faltering after their passing. The RSS, by contrast, rooted itself in collective endeavour, becoming an institution rather than a personality-centric movement. That institutional design is central to its growth across ten decades.
Equally important is the Sangh’s steadfastness in preserving its core ideology. Though it has been banned, criticised, and demonised by governments and intellectual elites alike, the RSS has not compromised its foundational belief that Bharat is a civilisational entity grounded in Sanatan Dharma, and that unity arises through cultural nationalism. While it has adapted to changing times—embracing technology, expanding its reach, and incubating affiliate institutions—it has avoided diluting its core principles to gain fleeting acceptance.
As Sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat famously said: “Acceptability that comes at the cost of abandoning fundamentals is not acceptability — it is extinction.” This refusal to forsake fundamentals helps explain why even critics accord it a certain respect. Another defining feature is the spirit of selfless service (seva) that has animated its members across six generations. It is rare, globally, to see multiple generations of families devote themselves to an organisation without expectation of position, remuneration, or accolades. Thousands of swayamsevaks attend shakhas in the mornings, swayamsevaks in service activities over weekends, and dedicate years as full-time pracharaks —often at personal sacrifice. This anonymity and humility have become among the RSS’s greatest strengths.
Yet another unique aspect is the Sangh’s commitment to building institutions rather than staging spectacular events. Its contributions in education, tribal welfare, disaster relief, women’s empowerment, and social reform have been made through steady, sustained work. The outcomes may not always dominate headlines, but they manifest over decades. Organisations such as the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram, Vidya Bharati, and Seva Bharati now serve millions — quietly, steadily, and without ostentation. Central to the RSS’s endurance is its vision of Hindutva. When the Sangh speaks of Hindutva, it does so not in a narrow sectarian sense, but as a civilisational identity. “Hindu” is not simply a religious label, but a concept of belonging — one that encompasses every community that regards Bharat as its motherland and shares its civilizational ethos. This expansive definition enables the RSS to resonate across caste, region, and language, even amid sustained caricature.
Importantly, the RSS has never depended on outside support or borrowed strength. It has been the RSS that offers its cadre to various organisations, never the reverse. Its power comes from within. This ethos of internal strength—nurtured from its earliest days to its present millions-strong cadre—is part of its foundation. As Indian society looks ahead, the RSS’s second century faces a vital challenge: preserving the delicate balance between principle and adaptability. It must remain anchored to its fundamentals, yet avoid ossification. The Sangh has lasted a century because it grasped something simple yet profound: institutions outlast individuals, service outlasts ambition, and civilisations outlast empires. That, in essence, is the lesson of the RSS’s first hundred years — one that may guide India in the century ahead.
Comments