Bengaluru: The Election Commission of India (ECI) has strongly rebutted allegations made by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who accused the Chief Election Commissioner of shielding voter fraud. In a swift counter, the Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) released documentary evidence proving that the very information Rahul Gandhi demanded had already been handed over to the investigating authorities nearly two years ago, in September 2023.
The clarification has put the Congress party on the back foot, exposing what the ECI describes as “baseless and misleading” claims intended to discredit the poll body.
Congress alleges obstruction, shares CID letter
The controversy erupted on September 9, 2025, when the Congress party uploaded a letter from the CID’s Cyber Crime Wing on its Facebook page. The letter, sent by DySP K. N. Yashwant Kumar to the CEO’s office, sought technical details including destination IP addresses and port numbers relating to fraudulent voter deletion applications submitted between December 2022 and February 2023 in the Aaland constituency.
Congress leaders argued that despite repeated reminders, the Election Commission had stonewalled the investigation by not handing over vital evidence. The party even alleged that “deliberate obstruction” was being done to shield fraudsters.
CEO counters with facts, says data handed over in 2023
However, hours later, the Karnataka CEO’s office issued a detailed press release, completely demolishing Rahul Gandhi’s allegations. The CEO stated unequivocally that all data available with the ECI had been provided to the Kalaburagi Superintendent of Police in September 2023.
The information shared included form reference numbers, names of objectors, EPIC numbers, mobile numbers used during login, software application mediums, IP addresses, location details of applicants, submission timestamps, and user creation details. The CEO further confirmed that after sharing this data, meetings were held with the investigating officer and cyber security experts to track progress.
“It is incorrect and misleading to suggest that the Election Commission has withheld any information. Whatever was available in our system was fully shared with the investigating agencies,” the release clarified.
Fraudulent deletion attempt exposed
Significantly, the CEO revealed that a staggering 6,018 online applications had been received for deletion of voters’ names in Aaland. On scrutiny, only 24 applications turned out to be genuine. The remaining 5,994 were fraudulent and were summarily rejected.
“This itself proves that the Election Commission acted diligently to prevent mass voter disenfranchisement,” an official source said, adding that it was the Commission’s vigilance that prevented thousands from being illegally removed from the rolls.
Congress’s selective narrative questioned
Observers have pointed out that the Congress party selectively highlighted the CID’s 2025 letter while suppressing the fact that the ECI had already cooperated with the probe in 2023. By doing so, the party attempted to paint the Commission as unresponsive a charge now proven false.
Legal experts argue that Rahul Gandhi’s remarks amount to casting aspersions on a constitutional authority without verifying facts. “The Election Commission functions under strict legal protocols. To allege obstruction without acknowledging the 2023 handover of information is not just misleading, it is a deliberate attempt to erode public trust,” said a senior advocate in Bengaluru.
A pattern of allegations
This is not the first time the Congress has targeted the Election Commission with accusations of bias. Political analysts say the party, facing increasing pressure in Karnataka due to corruption charges and internal dissent, has sought to deflect attention by manufacturing a narrative around “voter fraud.”
“Whenever cornered, the Congress plays the victim card and blames institutions. This episode is another chapter in that playbook,” said political commentator S. Raghavan. “But the Election Commission’s swift rebuttal shows that facts do not support their claims.”
CID officer remains silent
Interestingly, CID DySP Yashwant Kumar, whose letter Congress publicized, declined to answer queries when contacted by media outlets. His silence has further raised questions about whether the Congress selectively leaked the communication for political mileage while being aware of the ECI’s prior cooperation.
With the tribunal of public opinion turning against the Congress, the focus now shifts to the party’s credibility. By releasing incomplete facts, Rahul Gandhi and his team risk being accused of misleading voters. Meanwhile, the Election Commission has reiterated that it remains fully committed to assisting investigative agencies while safeguarding the sanctity of the electoral process.
The case also underscores how digital manipulation of voter rolls is becoming a new frontier in election-related crimes. Yet, the ECI’s data disclosure and rejection of nearly 6,000 fake applications demonstrates its proactive measures to prevent electoral fraud.
Comments