On June 10, 2025, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey triggered a political firestorm with a sharply worded post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), directly targeting the Gandhi family. In his post, Dubey accused Congress leader Rahul Gandhi of failing to learn from his family’s foreign policy missteps and domestic electoral controversies.
He cited the alleged support of late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat for Pakistan’s nuclear program as a symbol of these missteps and revived decades-old charges of electoral fraud committed during the tenure of former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.
Dubey’s statement, though politically charged, presents an opportunity to revisit two highly sensitive chapters of Indian history: the diplomatic tangle of Indo-Palestinian-Pakistani relations and the democratic turbulence of India during the 1970s and 1980s. This report attempts to contextualise Dubey’s remarks using historical documentation and established records.
Section 1: Arafat and the Atom
The heart of Dubey’s foreign policy allegation lies in a news report by United News of India (UNI), which documented Yasser Arafat’s public support for Pakistan’s nuclear tests in the late 1990s. During a brief transit at Islamabad airport en route to Beijing, Arafat reportedly questioned the double standards of global nuclear policy: “If Israel possesses nuclear weapons, then why cannot Pakistan have the nuclear capability?” The Palestinian leader’s comments were framed as solidarity with Pakistan and the broader Muslim world, which largely viewed the tests as a counterbalance to India’s regional power.
Addressing the media at Islamabad airport during his brief stopover before leaving for Beijing, Arafat said, “Arab and Muslim countries backed Pakistan for its nuclear tests.” There was a very positive and strong reaction from the Muslim world to Pakistan’s nuclear tests, he added.
Arafat disapproved of sanctions against Pakistan, and said these curbs could not sustain for a long time. Islamic countries, he said, will extend assistance to Pakistan if these sanctions continue.
राहुल बाबा आपके परिवार की विदेश नीति
1. इंदिरा गांधी जी के भाई यासिर अराफात इज़रायली न्यूक्लियर पावर की तरह पाकिस्तान के परमाणु हथियार का समर्थन कर रहा है
2. शिमला समझौता यासिर अराफ़ात ने करवाया,आजतक किसी सरकार ने मना नहीं किया
3. राजीव गाँधी जी द्वारा दिए पीस पुरस्कार के… pic.twitter.com/kauTDswcd8— Dr Nishikant Dubey (@nishikant_dubey) June 10, 2025
The Palestinian leader hoped that the meeting between Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his Indian counterpart Atal Bihari Vajpayee in Colombo, on the sidelines of the SAARC meeting later this month, would be useful and help reduce tensions. He called for a peaceful and negotiated settlement of the Kashmir and other issues between Pakistan and India.
Arafat recalled his mediation in 1972 which led to the signing of the Simla Agreement.
“You should not forget that I was the mediator in the Simla Agreement,” he told reporters.
Asked about press reports on Indo-Israel military co-operation, he said, “I hope this will not be done.”
It is in this context that Nishikant Dubey made his most jarring claim, that Yasser Arafat was somehow related to Indira Gandhi, referring to him as her “brother.” Dubey uses this claim to question the Congress party’s commitment to India’s national security, insinuating that the Gandhis endorsed leaders sympathetic to Pakistan.
Section 2: Ballot Boxes and Booths
On June 8, Dubey reignited a familiar accusation that the Congress party and specifically the Nehru-Gandhi family have a tainted record when it comes to electoral democracy.
He pointed to the infamous 1971 Rae Bareli election and the Allahabad High Court judgment in Smt. Indira Gandhi vs. Raj Narain, where Indira Gandhi was found guilty of electoral malpractices. These included the use of government resources, Air Force helicopters, and the services of a government official (Yashpal Kapoor) for her campaign. Justice Jagmohan Lal Sinha voided her election and disqualified her from holding office for six years, triggering one of the most dramatic episodes in Indian democracy, the declaration of Emergency in 1975.
Dubey also cited the 1980 general elections, which brought Indira Gandhi back to power after a three-year hiatus. That election, he alleges, was marred by widespread booth capturing, particularly in Bihar. Supporting his claims, Dubey referred to a Lok Sabha discussion held on July 1, 1980, where veteran parliamentarian Indrajit Gupta raised serious concerns. He pointed to delayed result declarations in 81 constituencies and detailed incidents of ballot tampering, violent attacks, and voter intimidation in regions such as Paru, Sursand, Mohiuddin Nagar, and Supaul.
Gupta, then with the CPI, called the situation “horrible,” openly questioning the moral authority of Congress’s victory. While Law Minister P. Shiv Shankar acknowledged irregularities and noted repolling in 20 constituencies under Section 58(2) of the Representation of the People Act, his remarks were seen as reactive rather than reformative.
Section 3: Social Media Allegations and Political Messaging
In his June 10 post, Nishikant Dubey packaged his criticisms into a potent political message aimed at the Congress party’s current leadership. “Rahul Baba, your family’s foreign policy… Learn the rubbish of foreign policy from Congress,” he wrote, linking Rahul Gandhi’s present political narrative with the perceived blunders of his forebears.
He added historical references to India’s diplomatic decisions during the 1965 and 1971 wars with Pakistan, accusing Congress governments of inconsistency in walking out of international financial forums like the IMF and World Bank when they extended loans to Pakistan.
The reference to Arafat’s alleged pro-Pakistan stance on Kashmir, combined with the electoral controversies of the 1970s and 1980s, was meant to suggest a pattern of betrayal and incompetence.
History as a Battleground
As the 2024 general elections fade into memory and political realignments begin ahead of upcoming state elections, history has once again become a tool for contemporary political messaging.
There is no doubt that India’s democratic journey has had its turbulent chapters. From the Emergency and the Allahabad ruling to the booth-capturing allegations in Bihar, these moments are part of the country’s complex political tapestry. But India has evolved. The Election Commission’s institutional reforms, including the introduction of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), voter ID cards, and stricter poll monitoring, have significantly curtailed the scope for manipulation that once plagued its electoral process.
What remains is the continued war of narratives. As of June 10, 2025, the BJP and Congress remain locked in a bitter ideological battle, with social media serving as the new battleground. Whether these historical references will sway public opinion or further polarise it remains to be seen.
Comments