Russian Prosecutor General’s Office on May 19, officially banned Amnesty International, designating the London-based human rights organisation as an “undesirable organisation” on Russian territory. The decision, published on the office’s website, accuses Amnesty of engaging in activities that undermine Russia’s national interests and threaten its constitutional order and security.
Russian authorities have condemned Amnesty International for what they described as persistent “Russophobic” behaviour. According to the Prosecutor General’s Office, Amnesty has systematically supported Ukraine amid its ongoing conflict with Russia, while attempting to justify the actions of Ukrainian neo-Nazi groups. The office further alleged that Amnesty has actively promoted the political and economic isolation of Russia and encouraged foreign states to increase funding to Ukraine’s military forces.
The designation under Russian law prohibits any cooperation with Amnesty International and criminalises its activities within Russia. This includes sharing or promoting its materials online or offline. Violations could lead to serious legal consequences, including imprisonment. This law, introduced in 2015, has become a key mechanism through which Moscow curbs foreign influence and what it deems subversive activities.
Russian officials argue that Amnesty International, under the guise of human rights advocacy, has repeatedly interfered in the country’s internal affairs. In their view, the organisation’s criticisms are not grounded in impartiality but are politically motivated and aligned with Western narratives hostile to Russia. They claim Amnesty’s reports often distort facts and serve as tools for Western governments to discredit Russia on the international stage.
Usual Pattern: Biased Human Rights Advocacy Aligned with Western Agendas
Amnesty International has long been under scrutiny in Russia for its stance on various domestic and international issues. The organisation has accused Russia of human rights abuses during its military operations in Ukraine and criticised domestic policies, including those related to political dissent and LGBTQ+ rights. However, Russian authorities assert that such actions reveal a clear ideological bias rather than a genuine concern for human rights.
With this decision, Amnesty joins a growing list of over 220 foreign organisations banned in Russia, including Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Chatham House, and Greenpeace. Moscow has defended these moves as necessary to protect national sovereignty and resist external pressure. The ban on Amnesty marks yet another step in Russia’s broader strategy to confront and eliminate what it sees as foreign attempts to destabilise the country under the pretext of democracy and human rights.
Amnesty halted India ; Russia Ban confirms Indian concerns were right
Amnesty’s controversial operations are not limited to Russia. In India, the organisation faced legal and financial scrutiny after the government froze its bank accounts in 2020. Amnesty halted its operations in the country, claiming repression, but official investigations pointed to serious violations of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA). The Ministry of Home Affairs found that Amnesty had received foreign funds illegally by bypassing Indian laws, raising significant questions about the group’s transparency and agenda.
Indian authorities and civil society groups have also criticised Amnesty for its selective human rights advocacy and overtly political positions, especially on sensitive national issues like Kashmir. The organisation’s tendency to portray India in a consistently negative light, while aligning with separatist narratives, has drawn widespread condemnation. These patterns reflect a broader strategy of exploiting human rights discourse to exert pressure on sovereign nations, an approach that now appears to have drawn the ire of both New Delhi and Moscow.
Comments