Like a far-fetched notion, similar to a possible coincidence. It reverberates across international think tanks, in South Asia policy circles, and among a diaspora that is more politically engaged than ever before. The tectonic plates of Balochistan’s political future are in flux, and Islamabad’s ability to keep them in place seems less and less likely.
Balochistan, Pakistan’s largest yet most underdeveloped province, is facing a deepening conflict that may reshape South Asia’s geopolitical landscape. With recent rebel successes and military attrition, Pakistan’s hold over Balochistan appears increasingly tenuous. The critical question arises: Is Balochistan moving toward independence, and can Pakistan prevent it?
To understand the current unrest, you have to go back to 1948, when Balochistan was a semi-autonomous state under the Khanate of Kalat, which was annexed by Pakistan at gunpoint soon after independence from British India. Backed by Britain, this was presented as a strategic imperative, and it planted seeds of deep-seated bitterness. To the Baloch, it was colonial domination, and it resulted in several revolts, including the ongoing “fifth war of independence”. The conflict is articulated by Baloch nationalists as a struggle for justice and self determination against military occupation and economic exploitation.
Baloch nationalism today is not a marginal sentiment. It is a rooted, more mainstream attitude, cemented by generations of neglect, political repression, and external exploitation. A multi-militant canopy like Baloch Raji Aajoi Sangar (BRAS) and Baloch National Army (BNA) represents a more developed and organised resistance; they not only coordinate attacks, but also announce political statements and propose roadmaps to an independent Baloch nation.
Over the last year, the Resistance Gained Ground, a turning point of sorts for the movement, where signs of Pakistan’s declining control over Balochistan have become visible. Former Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi’s recent statement that fear and lawlessness dominate the region was unprecedented. His statement was what many in the region already knew: the state’s grip is slipping.
The world must now confront a difficult reality: Balochistan may be headed toward de jure independence, if not a recognised statehood. Pakistan’s efforts to portray the conflict as merely externally sponsored terrorism ring hollow when its own leaders admit the situation is spiralling. The time for half-measures is over. Islamabad must decide whether to engage in genuine dialogue, offer autonomy, and reconcile with the Baloch people, or continue a doomed policy of suppression that risks the province slipping away altogether. However, Pakistan’s hands are full at the moment.
While a complete declaration of independence would certainly face some adverse obstacles, foremost being Pakistan’s adamant refusal to allow secessionism on any count, the foundation of a radical realignment has certainly been laid down. Many consider the Balochistan insurgency to have matured from a scattered armed revolt into a broad-based liberation movement founded on political grievances and international consciousness.
However, for Balochistan to move from de facto control to de facto independence, several factors must align. Balochistan will have to fight an external fight for international recognition, as no independence movement can truly succeed without external validation. Kosovo’s path, for instance, was largely defined by recognition from powerful states. For Balochistan, securing even informal diplomatic support from countries wary of Chinese expansionism or concerned with human rights in Pakistan could be a tipping point. Here, India might step in to provide support. So the question stays, is the road ahead a revolution or a resolution? For the young nation in formation.
The resistance must evolve from military action to political organisation. Institutional development of Balochistan i.e. governance structures, civil institutions, and transitional leadership, will be essential for any credible push for statehood. Currently, while armed groups lead the struggle, there is still limited clarity on what an independent Balochistan might look like in practice.
The potential aftermath of independence for Balochistan would carry huge cross-border complexities and related unanticipated implications for regional stability and security, specifically with Iran, which has a Baloch minority group that they fear might experience a spill-over effect, and push for their own form of independence from Iran. If any of this delicate equation goes awry, there is the potential for new fronts of conflict to emerge or attract them into Balochistan, undermining the very cause it seeks to project.
What will be Pakistan’s response post independence? Perhaps the most unpredictable variable remains Pakistan itself. Would it allow meaningful reforms and regional autonomy to de-escalate the crisis? Or would it double down on military suppression and information control in a desperate bid to maintain sovereignty?
Balochistan is not just Pakistan’s domestic concern. Its fate is bound up with global developments, ranging from China’s Belt and Road Initiative to shifting Indian perspective on counter-terrorism and human rights and the West’s strategic calculations in the South Asia region. What is the global community’s role going to be? Any lack of silence by global actors will be received as complicity by the Baloch resistance, while support, tacit or overt, will probably be taken as a signal to escalate.
The West, especially the U.S. and EU, now face a moral and strategic issue: will they only see Balochistan in terms of bilateral relations with Pakistan, or will they acknowledge the legitimacy of a people aspiring to freedom from decades of oppression?
Opposition from Pakistan and China could hinder Balochistan’s recognition of independence, as geopolitical alliances influence UN decisions. While reports of human rights violations may sway international opinion, they may not guarantee recognition. Baloch separatists’ appeals for support reflect their desire for global backing, but actual support will depend on political interests. India must tread carefully. Though they have the opportunity to checkmate Pakistan through Balochistan, they must consider the ramifications for endorsing any support for a secessionist narrative, given their own messy situation. Yet India’s growing standing in the world and in diplomacy may prove impactful in shaping perceptions of international legitimacy of the Baloch cause.
Pakistan’s inability to accept the legitimacy of Baloch grievances has converted an easy political crisis into a full-blown separatist movement. Unless Islamabad acts drastically and with some urgency, the fantasy of independent Balochistan may no longer be the exclusive preserve of rebel manifestos.
However, the status quo is dying, as the old order in Balochistan, defined by military occupation, economic extraction, and political silence, is crumbling. A new chapter is being written, authored by those who have long lived in the shadows of colonial borders and unfulfilled promises. Whether this chapter ends in autonomy, federal restructuring, or full independence remains unknown, but what is certain is this: the question is no longer if change will come, but when, and how. It may shortly require a seat at the table of nations.
Comments