The recent fare hike by the Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited (BMRCL) has sparked outrage among the public, with residents of Bengaluru expressing their dissatisfaction over the increased cost of travelling on the city’s metro system, which was once considered a beacon of clean, efficient, and eco-friendly public transport. The fare increase has strained the common man, especially in a city like Bengaluru, where traffic congestion and pollution are rampant.
BMRCL Managing Director Maheshwar Rao, on February 13, addressed the media to clarify the reasoning behind the fare hike, explaining that the increase was by a ticket fare adjustment report and had been under consideration for the past few years. He mentioned that the metro has been operating since 2010 and that the fare hike was essential to address the long-standing financial losses incurred by the BMRCL. Rao also acknowledged the mounting public opposition to the fare increase and assured that steps would be taken to review and reduce the hike in response to public outcry.
However, many citizens have voiced their frustration, criticising the Congress-led state government for mishandling the situation and failing to consider the public’s concerns. The fact that the metro fare was increased without adequate consideration for the impact on daily commuters has drawn sharp criticism from various sections of society. Even with the announcement of a fare reduction, the underlying question remains: Why did the government allow such an increase in the first place? The timing and manner in which this fare hike was implemented fueled growing anger towards the Congress administration.
Rao informed the media that discussions with the BMRCL board and senior officials had led to a decision to reduce the fare hike to a more manageable level, with the new fares expected to be announced soon. He also assured that the fare adjustment would relieve the public, with the highest increases being reduced to 45 per cent. However, the question arises as to why the initial fare hike was so steep in the first place. In some cases, ticket fares increased by up to 100 per cent, with the maximum fare reaching Rs. 90. The Congress government failed to manage this issue in a way that considered the financial reality of the common man.
BMRCL has justified the fare hike by citing necessary investments in platform doors, loans, and maintenance expenses. However, many argue that the government should have explored alternative funding mechanisms rather than burdening the citizens with steep price increases, especially considering that Bengaluru’s metro is still running at a loss. While it is true that the metro system needs financial stability to sustain operations, it is equally important to balance this with public sentiment. The Congress government, however, seems to have ignored this balance.
The opposition has quickly jumped on the issue, accusing the Congress government of being out of touch with the needs and concerns of the people. Opposition leaders have pointed out that the fare hike comes when citizens are already grappling with high inflation, rising fuel prices, and an overall increase in the cost of living. By raising fares on such a significant scale, the government has only exacerbated the financial burden on Bengaluru’s working-class citizens, who rely on public transport for their daily commute.
BMRCL’s decision to temporarily halt the implementation of the fare hike and rework the pricing structure is a step in the right direction. However, the Congress government must be held accountable for the damage caused by its hasty decision-making. The initial fare hike, coupled with the lack of consultation with the public and stakeholders, clearly indicates that the administration is either incompetent or simply unwilling to prioritise the needs of the people.
As per the latest announcement, BMRCL’s revised fare list will soon be released, and the new fare structure will be implemented. While the promise of reduced fares is welcome news, the question remains: Why did the government allow such a drastic increase in the first place? How can the Congress administration ensure such an oversight does not occur again?
The people of Bengaluru deserve a transparent and accountable government that prioritises their welfare. The Congress government’s handling of this fare hike controversy has left many questioning its ability to govern effectively and fairly. Only time will tell whether the reduced fares will be enough to win back public trust or the damage caused by this misstep will linger.
Passenger Numbers Drop as Namma Metro Faces Fare Hike Backlash
The recent fare hike in Namma Metro has sparked frustration among passengers, leading to 100 per cent of commuters opting for private vehicles instead, questioning the value of paying higher fares for a metro ride.
The fare revision, which increased the cost of travel between Nallur Village and Benniganahalli from Rs 23.75 to Rs 50, has led to a significant drop in the number of passengers. While the usual ridership hovers between 8 to 8.5 lakh passengers daily, the numbers fell by approximately 80,000 on February 11, with just 7,78,774 commuters using the service. In comparison, on February 4, the metro carried 8,58,417 passengers.
Despite this decline, revenue from the metro increased, with Rs 3.91 crore collected on Monday, a sign that the fare hike is still generating income despite passenger dissatisfaction.
The Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation (BMRCL) has earlier defended the price increase, citing the financial pressure of servicing an annual debt of Rs 500-Rs 800 crore and the high costs involved in maintaining and developing metro stations, which require a reserve of Rs 6 crore each. BMRCL’s operational revenue reached ₹200 crore in the last financial year, but with a modest net profit of Rs 20 crore, the fare hike was deemed necessary to sustain operations.
The fare increase was made following the recommendations of the Fare Revision Committee, headed by a High Court judge. The Union government, rather than the state government, oversees the revision of metro fares, with both state and Union governments sharing equal responsibility for the metro project.
However, the fare hike has been a point of contention for local political leaders. DCM D.K. Shivakumar stressed that the fare hike decision was not solely under state control, pointing out the 50:50 funding arrangement between the state and Union governments.
Meanwhile, BJP MP Tejaswi Surya blamed the state government, claiming the fare hike burdened the public. In response, CM Siddaramaiah clarified that the Union government had approved the fare increase, but the state had written a letter requesting the revision of various fees, including metro fares.
Comments