The Special People’s Court’s order to investigate CM Siddaramaiah related to allegations surrounding the MUDA scam. The court’s decision has prompted the Mysore Lokayukta to prepare for an FIR against the Chief Minister. There are growing concerns that Siddaramaiah could face arrest as the investigation intensifies.
Siddaramaiah’s legal team is reportedly gearing up to challenge the Special Court’s decision in the Karnataka High Court. They plan to seek an interim injunction to halt the Lokayukta probe and, if necessary, will escalate the matter to a Divisional Bench or even the Supreme Court.
The High Court’s landmark decision in 2022 that reinstated the Lokayukta’s powers was a turning point in Karnataka’s anti-corruption framework. The court had quashed the ACB, stating that its formation in 2016 was not by legal procedures. The verdict transferred all ACB cases back to the Lokayukta, reaffirming its authority to investigate corruption.
In 2016.. Siddaramaiah, who became the CM in the first period, curtailed the power of the Lokayukta. Thus, the Lokayukta was like a toothless snake. CM Siddaramaiah formed ACB as an alternative to Lokayukta. Now CM Siddaramaiah, who was deprived of the power of Lokayukta, has fallen into the trap of the same Lokayukta.
Karnataka was once seen as a pioneer in the fight against corruption, thanks to the establishment of the Lokayukta. The institution, empowered by law to investigate corruption cases, gained a formidable reputation for exposing the corrupt, particularly those within government circles. The Lokayukta police, with their sweeping powers under the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988, led dramatic raids and caught officials with bribe money, often running into crores. These high-profile busts made headlines, instilling fear among those engaged in corrupt practices.
However, in 2016, during Siddaramaiah’s first term as Chief Minister, the powers of the Lokayukta were clipped with the formation of the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB). By transferring investigative authority from the Lokayukta to the newly formed ACB, the government effectively diluted the Lokayukta’s capacity to act against corruption. Many viewed the creation of the ACB as a political move designed to weaken the Lokayukta and shield certain officials from scrutiny.
This verdict was a significant blow to Siddaramaiah, who had actively championed the ACB during his tenure. With the Lokayukta back in full force, Siddaramaiah finds himself on the receiving end of its investigation.
The court-mandated investigation into the MUDA scam places Siddaramaiah under intense scrutiny. The case revolves around alleged irregular land allotment and approvals within the Mysore Urban Development Authority when Siddaramaiah’s influence was notable. Allegations suggest that land was allocated illegally or at lower prices to individuals linked to the Chief Minister, causing significant losses to the state exchequer.
The Special People’s Court has directed the Lokayukta to investigate the involvement of Siddaramaiah and possibly other key individuals in the scam. As per the court order, the Lokayukta is to submit its report in the next three months, potentially leading to the registration of an FIR against the Chief Minister.
With the impending Lokayukta investigation, Siddaramaiah’s legal team is preparing to question the Special Court’s decision. The Chief Minister is expected to approach the Karnataka High Court, seeking an interim stay on the investigation. His legal team is also preparing to appeal the court’s directive before a Divisional Bench or even the Supreme Court, should it be necessary.
In addition, there are reports that Siddaramaiah may challenge the validity of the Governor’s approval for the Lokayukta probe, which was crucial for the investigation to proceed against him, given his current role as Chief Minister. His lawyers will likely argue that the Governor’s sanction was improperly granted and seek a judicial stay.
The 2022 High Court decision that nullified the ACB was seen as a watershed moment in Karnataka’s anti-corruption efforts. The two-judge bench comprising Justice B. Veerappa and Justice H.S. Hemalekha upheld public interest petitions filed by groups like the Bangalore Bar Association and Samaj Parivarthana Samudaya. The court ruled that the 2016 formation of the ACB lacked legal grounding and that the Lokayukta had always been the appropriate body to handle corruption cases. By quashing the ACB, the court essentially reversed years of efforts to diminish the Lokayukta’s role in the state.
Amid this growing legal storm, Pradeep Kumar, one of the key complainants in the MUDA case, has already lodged a formal complaint with the Mysuru Lokayukta. He is demanding that an FIR be filed against Siddaramaiah, as well as against his son, Yathindra Siddaramaiah, his wife, Parvathy Siddaramaiah, and a close associate, Mallikarjuna.
Alongside Kumar, JDS leaders have also been vocal in pushing for an investigation into the MUDA scam. They have stepped up their demands in recent weeks, calling for Siddaramaiah’s resignation and urging the Lokayukta to swiftly file charges against him.
The Lokayukta investigation could have profound political implications for Siddaramaiah and the ruling Congress government in Karnataka. With the BJP and JDS seizing the opportunity to criticize Siddaramaiah’s administration, the case will likely become a major political issue in the state.
The investigation could also test Siddaramaiah’s political resilience. Having curtailed the Lokayukta’s power during his earlier tenure as Chief Minister, Siddaramaiah now finds himself vulnerable to the institution he once sidelined. His ability to navigate this crisis will determine not only his political future but also the stability of the Congress government in Karnataka.
In the coming weeks, all eyes will be on the Mysuru Lokayukta and the legal developments in the High Court as the probe unfolds. Whether Siddaramaiah can stave off the investigation or whether he will face legal proceedings remains to be seen. One thing is certain—the Lokayukta, once a feared anti-corruption body, is back in the spotlight, and it could spell trouble for Karnataka’s Chief Minister.
Comments