Polycystic Ovarian Disease (PCOD) is a hormonal imbalance that disrupts the normal fertility cycle of women. It occurs when one of the ovaries starts overproducing immature eggs, which then accumulate in the ovary. In short, PCOD can lead to infertility in women. Based on medical definitions and doctors’ insights, this disease might seem natural, genetic, or a result of divine unkindness. However, just as lightning and rainbows are not acts of divine grace, PCOD is neither a genetic nor a natural disease. It is part of a sinister pattern, designed by malicious individuals, to control the population.
If you look around, you will notice many cases of PCOD. If not in your immediate vicinity, ask your neighbours and their relatives. You will undoubtedly find many young women scheduling appointments with their gynaecologists, sharing their woes and feelings of hopelessness. Listen closely, and you will hear the laments of mothers who have lost children to miscarriage. Gynaecologists, charging ₹5000 per appointment, often attribute the cause to food, water, pollution, and other factors. To offer a glimmer of hope, they might suggest IVF, surrogacy, or other alternatives. However, the underlying issue remains. A country like India, once renowned for its high fertility rate, now has a fertility rate of only 2.1 percent—a 20 per cent decline over the last decade. Gynaecologists may be unaware, ignorant, or unable to comprehend the deeper facts underlying this issue.
In this article, we will expose a series of schemes designed to disrupt the population of many South Asian countries. While many in the West may view South Asian countries as “Third World,” there is one advantage these nations have had over the developed world: a large number of fertile women. A country with a vast population of naturally fertile women has the potential to dominate the global economy within 20-25 years. This presents a significant threat to the West, particularly a country like India. After already contending with the challenge of a rising communist China, the West cannot afford the emergence of another major economy like India, fuelled by its population and fertile women. Now, let’s unravel the web woven by these sinister forces.
Unveiling a Controversial Legacy
The Rockefeller family, an eminent American dynasty, has left an indelible mark on various sectors, including business, banking, politics, healthcare, education, conservation, and the arts. While this noble business may appear in light, a darker truth about the family lurks in the shadows.
Nelson Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger
Nelson A Rockefeller, a member of the family’s third generation, served as the 49th Governor of New York and the 41st Vice President of the United States. His tenure in public office was marked by close ties with influential figures, notably Henry Kissinger. Kissinger, an intellectual and diplomat, was financially supported by the Rockefellers for 15 years before becoming the seventh United States National Security Advisor. During his tenure, Kissinger authored a highly secretive report that outlined strategies for controlling global population, primarily targeting less developed countries in Asia and Africa to safeguard U.S. security and interests.
Targeting Bharat and Beyond
Kissinger’s report identified India, along with Pakistan, Bangladesh, and some underdeveloped nations, as primary targets for population control. He argued that the issue was complex and required long-term solutions rather than short-term efforts driven by moral fervour. Kissinger’s recommendations included both long-term and short-term strategies, with a particular focus on biomedical research and sterilisation programmes.
Kissinger wrote, “The problem is more long term and complex than first appeared and that a short term burst of activity or moral fervor will not solve it. The danger in this realisation is that the U.S. might abandon its commitment to assisting in the world’s population problem, rather than facing up to it for the long-run difficult problem that it is. From year to year we are learning more about what kind of fertility reduction is feasible in differing LDC situations. Given the laws of compound growth, even comparatively small reductions in fertility over the next decade will make a significant difference in total numbers by the year 2000, and a far more significant one by the year 2050. The proposed strategy calls for a coordinated approach to respond to the important U.S. foreign policy interest in the influence of population growth on the world’s political, economic and ecological systems.’
What did he mean by saying that ‘moral fervour’ will not solve it? You will find the answer at the end of this article.
West Applauds Draconian Emergency
In 1976, during India’s Emergency period, the Government conducted forced sterilisations, resulting in the sterilisation of 6.2 million men within a year, with nearly two thousand deaths occurring during the procedures. The World Bank, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), and the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) played significant roles in these efforts.
International Involvement and Recognition
In 1983, the UN Population Fund awarded Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi for her efforts in population control. This organisation, alongside the World Bank, continued to influence and fund population control initiatives in poorer countries. Kissinger’s report emphasised the importance of reaching rural areas in low-income countries by providing basic public health services with the help of organisations like the UNFPA, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, WHO, and UNICEF. Examining WHO documents reveals that the partners and agencies supporting the acceleration of Public Health Centers (PHC) include familiar names such as UNFPA, the Rockefeller Foundation, the World Bank, UNICEF, and USAID.
Role of Biomedical Research
A significant aspect of Kissinger’s strategy was the emphasis on biomedical research as a means of fertility control. In 1985, the Rockefeller Foundation funded the National Institute of Immunology in New Delhi, India, to research a fertility control vaccine. By 1992, the institute had developed a birth control vaccine, which prevented pregnancy by injecting the pregnancy hormone HCG into the bloodstream, triggering an immune response.
To better understand the science behind it, watch this video by Dr. David Ayoub. However, you can’t inject HCG directly into the bloodstream; you need a carrier. What could that carrier be? Listen again to Dr. David Ayoub!
The GAVI Alliance and Continued Efforts
In 2000, the GAVI Alliance was established with Bill Gates as its primary funder. Partners included WHO, the World Bank, UNICEF, and various NGOs. GAVI’s mission was to provide vaccinations to less developed countries, echoing the strategies outlined in Kissinger’s report. Following the plan outlined in Kissinger’s report to create a vast network of primary health centers, GAVI, Bill Gates, WHO, World Bank, UNICEF, and other private donors have worked to establish such centers at the village level, enabling mass vaccination.
Controversies and Ethical Concerns
In 2009, the deaths of nine tribal girls following an HPV vaccine trial in India sparked controversy. A 2013 report by the Standing Committee of the Rajya Sabha implicated GAVI, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, PATH, and ICMR in the incident. Despite the findings, no significant actions were taken against the involved organisations.
The National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), India’s apex immunisation advisory body, had financial ties with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation until 2017. Despite the cessation of direct financial support, the foundation continues to collaborate closely with Indian health authorities. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation continues to work closely with ICMR, PATH, and NTAGI, maintaining access to the President, Prime Minister, and almost all Chief Ministers of India.
Melinda Gates visited India on December 5, 2022
On December 13, the NTAGI chief stated that he hopes India will soon include the HPV vaccine for girls aged nine to 14 in the national programme. NK Arora, Chairperson of the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) for the HPV programme, has a special memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
As you have read above, the Rockefellers, Henry Kissinger, and the Gates family, along with a select few, have taken it upon themselves to decide who will have children and who will not. They have determined who will experience the joy of raising children and who will be denied that opportunity. It is both sad and unfortunate, and now their influence has become so entrenched that even a leader with noble intentions can only shake a few branches, while the roots remain intact. Only the unbridled raw power of the people can or must shake the tectonic plates to uproot the evil seeds planted by the Rockefellers, Kissinger, and Gates.
In present-day Bharat, living in a densely populated city might make you view the population as a curse. But that perception has been engineered. Population is actually a boon for a country; it just needs to be harnessed for national prosperity. High-income countries like Japan and South Korea are facing low fertility problems and are concerned about their future sustainability. Tokyo is the most populated city in the world, and its population growth has been directly proportional to Japan’s growth. However, our education system has introduced terms like “population explosion” and “population boom” to make it seem like having more children is a threat to humanity. It is not. Only more humans can save humanity.
Comments