A recent visit by a group of Jain monks accompanied by leaders of the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) to the Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra in Ajmer, an Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)-protected mosque, led by Sunil Sagar Maharaj, asserted that the structure was once a Sanskrit school and claimed the existence of a Jain temple on the site before the school was established.
The visit took place on May 7, with the monks making their way to the monument from Fawara Circle via Dargah Bazaar. Neeraj Jain, the Deputy Mayor of Ajmer Municipal Corporation, revealed that the Jain monks believe there was a Jain temple prior to the establishment of a Sanskrit school at the site. He further explained that previous demands had been made to redevelop the monument and restore its former glory, citing the presence of murtis stored in a room within the structure.
The ASI’s description of the monument suggests a complex history, indicating the presence of a Hindu temple in the vicinity during the 11th-12th century AD. Numerous architectural elements and sculptures from temples are found within the verandah of the complex, highlighting its potential Hindu origins. The name “Adhai Din Ka Jhonpra” is believed to stem from the tradition of holding a fair at the site for two and a half days.
Earlier, in a major victory for the Hindu side, a Varanasi court on January 31, 2024 allowed Hindu devotees to offer prayers inside the ‘Vyas Ka Tekhana’ area inside the Gyanvapi complex. The court has asked district administration to make the necessary arrangements in the next seven days.
Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side told an Indian media agency that the Puja will start within seven days. Everyone will have the right to perform Puja. “Hindu side allowed to offer prayers at ‘Vyas Ka Tekhana’. The District Administration will have to make arrangements within 7 days,” Jain said.
The complex has four ‘tahkhana’ (cellars) in the basement out of which one is still in possession of the Vyas family who used to live here. Vyas had petitioned that as hereditary pujari he be allowed to enter the tahkhana and resume pooja.
Hindu side lawyer, Advocate Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi says, “Today right has been given to perform puja at ‘Vyas Ka Tekhana’ and the court has given the order to the District Officer for compliance of the order within a week.”
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) unveiled startling revelations from its exhaustive 850-page survey report. The report, released on January 25 after submission to the district court in Varanasi on January 21, sheds light on the historical complexities surrounding the existing structure at the Gyanvapi site.
According to the report, an inscription found in the lower room of the south corridor within the structure commemorates the construction of a mosque during the 20th regnal year of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, corresponding to A.H. 1087 (1676–77 CE). A meticulous comparison between this inscription and a copy made by ASI in 1965–66 uncovered deliberate attempts to erase the final two lines, which mentioned the construction and expansion.
The ASI’s comprehensive survey, encompassing scientific studies, architectural remains, artefacts, inscriptions, and sculptures, presents compelling evidence suggesting the pre-existence of a Hindu temple predating the current structure. The report, available with Organiser, highlights the presence of hundreds of artefacts, broken statues, and murtis, reinforcing the assertion of a pre-existing Hindu temple.
“Based on scientific studies/surveys, the examination of architectural remains, inscriptions, and artistic elements, it can be concluded that there existed a Hindu temple prior to the construction of the existing structure,” the ASI report concludes, echoing the sentiments of historical inquiry and meticulous investigation.
Comments