Guwahati: In a significant move towards implementing a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), the Assam government, led by Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, made a decisive decision to repeal the archaic Assam Muslim Marriage & Divorce Registration Act 1935. The pivotal announcement was made during a cabinet meeting on January 23rd, underlining the state’s commitment to modernise its legal framework.
Cabinet Minister Jayanta Mallabarua, addressing the media, emphasised the importance of this decision in the context of achieving a Uniform Civil Code. He explained that all matters related to Muslim marriages and divorces would now fall under the purview of the Special Marriages Act, aligning with Chief Minister Sarma’s vision for a uniform legal framework.
Mallabarua highlighted the key implications of the repeal, stating, “The Assam Muslim Marriage & Divorce Registration Act 1935, under which 94 Muslim registrars were still functioning, has been repealed today. The cabinet has ended this Act, and no Muslim marriage or divorce will be registered under this act. All matters will now be settled through the Special Marriages Act.”
The authority for the registration of Muslim marriages and divorces will now transition to the District Commissioner and the District Registrar, streamlining the process and ensuring uniformity. Additionally, the 94 Muslim registrars under the repealed Act will be relieved of their duties, accompanied by a one-time compensation of Rs 2 lakh for each individual.
Mallabarua emphasised the broader societal impact of this decision, particularly in combating child marriage. He stated, “This move is a step towards eradicating child marriage, which is the marriage of men under 21 years of age and women under 18 years of age.” By discarding an outdated legal framework, the government aims to address not only the immediate concerns related to Muslim marriages but also contribute to the larger goal of social reform.
As Assam pioneers this progressive step, it signals a commitment to legal modernization and societal welfare, resonating with the broader vision of a Uniform Civil Code. The decision reflects a conscious effort to adapt to contemporary values and move beyond historical legislative remnants.
Comments