Farmers Protest: What were Swaminathan Committee recommendations; Why did Congres reject them?
December 5, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Farmers Protest: What were Swaminathan Committee recommendations; Why did Congres reject them?

During its tenure from 2004 to 2006, the Congress-led UPA government declined to implement the Swaminathan Commission's recommendations, citing concerns of 'counter-productivity'

WEBDESKWEBDESK
Feb 14, 2024, 07:30 pm IST
in Bharat, Delhi
Follow on Google News
Congress Dirty Politics: UPA that refused to accept Swaminathan Committee's MSP recommendations during their rule is now rallying behind farmer's protest to being MSP law (Image: Organiser)

Congress Dirty Politics: UPA that refused to accept Swaminathan Committee's MSP recommendations during their rule is now rallying behind farmer's protest to being MSP law (Image: Organiser)

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

In a bold declaration on February 13, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi vowed to introduce a Minimum Support Price (MSP) guarantee law if his party secures victory in the 2024 Lok Sabha Elections. This promise, aimed particularly at the agricultural community, echoes the demands voiced by farmers rallying towards Delhi. Despite its apparent appeal, a closer examination of the economic landscape casts doubt on the feasibility of such a proposal.

Congress’s promise and denial 

Gandhi’s assertion, made on Tuesday, aligns with the recommendations of the Swaminathan Committee’s National Commission on Farmers, which advocated for a minimum support price set at least 50 percent higher than the weighted average cost of production, often referred to as the C2+50 percent formula. However, historical precedent complicates the credibility of the Congress party’s commitment. During its tenure from 2004 to 2006, the Congress-led UPA government declined to implement the Swaminathan Commission’s recommendations, citing concerns of ‘counter-productivity’.

KV Thomas, who served as the Minister of State for Agriculture in 2010, revealed in the Rajya Sabha that the MSP recommendation was rejected by the then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh-led government due to apprehensions about potential market distortions. Officials argued that a rigid link between MSP and production costs could have adverse consequences, highlighting the complexity of agricultural pricing dynamics.

Critics and government officials have raised concerns about the practicality of enacting legislation guaranteeing MSP for all crops. With the total value of agricultural produce in the country estimated at Rs 40 lakh crore during the fiscal year 2020, and the market value of crops under the MSP regime standing at approximately Rs 10 lakh crore, implementing such a law would strain government finances, leaving little room for other development and social initiatives.

Despite the populist appeal of promising MSP guarantees, the intricate economic realities underscore the challenges inherent in fulfilling such commitments. As political rhetoric intensifies in the lead-up to the elections, the feasibility and implications of proposed policies like the MSP guarantee law warrant thorough scrutiny and debate.

What were the recommendations of Swaminathan Commission?

The Swaminathan Commission, through multiple reports issued between 2004 and 2006, put forth several crucial recommendations aimed at bolstering agricultural sustainability and supporting the welfare of farmers. Among its most significant proposals was the advocacy for a Minimum Support Price (MSP) set at a level at least 50 percent higher than the weighted average cost of production. This formula, known as the C2+50 percent formula, factored in not only the input costs of capital and land rent but also aimed to ensure that farmers received a fair share of the returns from their produce. Additionally, the commission emphasised the importance of implementing comprehensive agricultural reforms to address issues such as land rights, access to credit, and agricultural infrastructure development. By prioritising the welfare of farmers and promoting sustainable agricultural practices, the Swaminathan Commission’s recommendations sought to mitigate the challenges faced by India’s agricultural sector and foster long-term growth and prosperity.

The farmer’s protest

Led by Jagjeet Singh Dallewal and Sarwan Singh Pandher of the Sanyukt Kisan Morcha and Punjab Kisan Mazdoor Sangharsh Committee, farmers are currently en route to Delhi, demanding action on a comprehensive list of 12 demands.

Their primary request is the implementation of a law guaranteeing Minimum Support Price (MSP) for all crops, based on the recommendations outlined in the Swaminathan Commission report. Additionally, they are calling for a complete waiver of agricultural debts, the establishment of a pension scheme for both farmers and farm labourers, the withdrawal of the Electricity Amendment Bill 2020, and the reinstatement of the Land Acquisition Act of 2013 ensuring farmer consent and compensation at four times the collector rate.

In light of recent events, the farmers are also seeking justice through the prosecution of individuals implicated in the Lakhimpur Kheri killings. They advocate for 200 days of employment per year and a daily wage of Rs 700 under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (MGNREGA), with a specific emphasis on creating opportunities connected to farming.

Furthermore, the farmers are demanding compensation for the families of those who lost their lives during the protests in 2021, as well as the provision of employment opportunities for affected family members. These demands underscore the multifaceted challenges faced by farmers and their families, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive policy interventions to address their grievances.

Protests in Delhi

According to farmer leader Rakesh Tikait, the demands for a Minimum Support Price (MSP) law, the implementation of the Swaminathan Committee report, and debt waivers resonate with farmers nationwide. He expressed solidarity with those participating in the ‘Delhi Chalo’ protest, highlighting the common concerns that unite farmers across the country.

“MSP guarantee law and Swaminathan Committee report, Electricity Amendment Bill, and debt waiver are issues affecting farmers across India. While various farmer unions may have different concerns, if the government creates obstacles for those marching towards Delhi, we stand with them in support,” Tikait stated to ANI.

As a significant number of farmers made their way towards the national capital on Tuesday, tensions escalated as police fired tear gas at protesters near the Punjab-Haryana Shambhu Border, leading to chaotic scenes. The farmers, in response, attempted to breach the multi-layered barricades using tractors and hand tools, resulting in several demonstrators being detained by Haryana police.

Security measures, including concrete slabs, iron nails, barricades, barbed wires, and the deployment of police and paramilitary personnel, were put in place in Kurukshetra, Haryana, in anticipation of the ‘Delhi Chalo’ march by farmers.

In a statement on X, Rahul Gandhi proclaimed, “Today marks a historic day for our farmer brothers! The Congress party has pledged to legally guarantee MSP for every crop to farmers, following the Swaminathan Commission’s recommendations. This measure will transform the lives of 15 crore farmer families, ensuring their prosperity. This marks Congress’s first step towards justice.”

Topics: Swaminathan CommissionMSP promise by CongressAgricultural lawsBJPCongressMSPfarmers protestSwaminathan Commission's recommendations
ShareTweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

Akhil Bharatiya Kalasadhak Sangam: Art forms imbibe compassion, sensitivity and make Humans civilised

Next News

Chhattisgarh: CM Sai flagged off special train carrying devotees to Ayodhya under “Sri Ramlala Darshan Yojna”

Related News

Fact Check: Rahul Gandhi false claim about govt blocking his meet with Russian President Putin exposed; MEA clears air

Economic freefall of West Bengal: Mamata’s “Paribartan” turns to crisis; 207 Companies gone in six months

Karnataka: Outrage erupts as GBA renames Kumaraswamy layout to Yarab Nagar, BJP slams ‘Appeasement Politics’

Leader of Oppositon in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari

BJP writes to Election Commission, alleges ‘Undue influence’ in Bengal SIR of voter rolls

Arunachal gives landslide win to BJP in Panchayat Elections

Arunachal Pradesh Panchayat Polls: BJP wins half of the seats unopposed even before elections are held

Sanchar Saathi vs. Manufactured Panic: Why Congress’ ‘Snooping’ charge crumbles under facts

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

PM Modi presents Putin with Bhagavad Gita, chess set, and silver horse

Cultural ties strengthened: PM Modi presents Putin with Bhagavad Gita, chess set, and silver horse

Image for representational purpose only, Courtesy Vocal Media

Bihar to get ‘Special Economic Zones’ in Buxar and West Champaran

Thirupparankundram Karthigai Deepam utsav

Andhra Pradesh: AP Dy CM Pawan Kalyan reacts to Thirupparankundram row, flags concern over religious rights of Hindus

23rd India-Russia Annual Summit

India-Russia Summit heralds new chapter in time-tested ties: Inks MoUs in economic, defence, tourism & education

DGCA orders probe into IndiGo flight disruptions; Committee to report in 15 days

BJYM leader Shyamraj with Janaki

Kerala: Widow of BJP worker murdered in 1995 steps into electoral battle after three decades at Valancherry

Russian Sber bank has unveiled access to its retail investors to the Indian stock market by etching its mutual fund to Nifty50

Scripting economic bonhomie: Russian investors gain access to Indian stocks, Sber unveils Nifty50 pegged mutual funds

Petitioner S Vignesh Shishir speaking to the reporters about the Rahul Gandhi UK citizenship case outside the Raebareli court

Rahul Gandhi UK Citizenship Case: Congress supporters create ruckus in court; Foreign visit details shared with judge

(L) Kerala High Court (R) Bouncers in Trippoonithura temple

Kerala: HC slams CPM-controlled Kochi Devaswom Board for deploying bouncers for crowd management during festival

Fact Check: Rahul Gandhi false claim about govt blocking his meet with Russian President Putin exposed; MEA clears air

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies