Sanatana Dharma Eradication Conference: CJI refuses to permit urgent mentioning of fresh plea, asks to follow procedure
December 5, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Law

Sanatana Dharma Eradication Conference: CJI refuses to permit urgent mentioning of fresh plea, asks to follow procedure

Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin’s son, Udhayanidhi Stalin, made a statement in favour of eradicating Sanatana Dharma, likening it to mosquitos, dengue fever, malaria and COVID-19 virus, during the Sanatana Dharma Eradication Conference

WEBDESKWEBDESK
Sep 15, 2023, 04:15 pm IST
in Law, Tamil Nadu
Follow on Google News
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud (Left), Udhayanidhi Stalin (Right)

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud (Left), Udhayanidhi Stalin (Right)

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

On September 15, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud refused to permit the mentioning of a writ petition against the Sanatana Dharma Eradication Conference, which was held in Tamil Nadu on September 2, and asked the petitioner to follow the procedure for urgent listing instead. The Supreme Court’s three-judge bench, comprising CJI Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, refused to permit the mentioning of the matters not on the mentioning list and asked the advocates to circulate an email for urgent listing.

The petitioner contends that the Sanatanam (Sanatana Dharma) Abolition Conclave (Conclave for Destruction of Sanatana Dharma), held in Chennai on September 2, was organised with the intent of eradicating a specific religion. Notably, almost all members of the I.N.D.I alliance were part of this conclave.

“Conference was held specifically to target Hinduism (also referred as “Sanatanam Dharma”) and to abuse, humiliate, speak in derogatory language and spread hatred towards Sanatanam Dharma,” reads the petition.

Furthermore, the petitioner submits that the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin’s son, Udhayanidhi Stalin, made a statement in favour of eradicating Sanatana Dharma, likening it to mosquitos, dengue fever, malaria and COVID-19 virus. The petition further submits that the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) President and Lok Sabha MP, Thol Thirumavalavan, urged the OBCs and SCs to unite and called for a Brahmin genocide.

The petitioner alleged that these statements were a textbook example of hate speech and sought action against Udhayanidhi Stalin for expressing such hate against Sanatana Dharma and Hindus. The writ petition further alleges Tamil Nadu Police’s bias and discrimination against Hindus as no FIR has been filed with regard to the case.

“If there is no First Information Report upon complaint against Udaynidhi Stalin or PK Sekar Babu or even DK President Veeramani or atleast even the organisers of the said conference even after so much of hue & cry it is clear that there is bias, favouritism & discrimination against Hindus & that even the Tamil Nadu Police is not as Religiously Neutral as the British Police & that despite the Constitution being in force in a Secular country this is unfortunately happening & it is needlessly evident to state that there has been a systematic complete breakdown of constitutional machinery in the State of Tamil Nadu,” the petition submits.

The petitioner submits that the Supreme Court’s 2018 verdict mandated the appointment of a Nodal Officer to combat hate speech. However, the petitioner contends that the Tamil Nadu Police have not appointed the Nodal Officers to combat hate speech, continuing to defy the apex court’s verdict.

The petitioner seeks that the participation of the State Ministers in the Sanatana Dharma Eradication Conference is declared unconstitutional and violative of Articles 25 & 26 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner further seeks directions to the Home Secretary and the CBI director to initiate an investigation into the said events, including the sources of funding, and potential terror funding by Sri Lanka’s LTTE funds.

The petitioner seeks an instruction to the Tamil Nadu State Government’s Higher Education Department to prohibit such conferences against Sanatana Dharma in secondary schools in accordance with the Supreme Court’s earlier rulings. The petitioner seeks a direction to the Tamil Nadu DGP to submit a report on how the conference was granted police permission and why no action has been taken against the organisers of the conference.

The petitioner seeks a direction to the Home Secretary and the Tamil Nadu DGP to appoint a Nodal Officer in accordance with the apex court’s 2018 verdict. The petitioner seeks registration of FIR against the organisers and alleged perpetrators of hate speech, including Udhayanidhi Stalin, PK Sekar Babu and Peter Alphonse.

The petitioner further seeks an injunction restraining Udhayanidhi Stalin, Peter Alphonse, A Raja, Thol Thirumavalavan, and their followers, from making further hate speech against Sanatana Dharma. The petitioner seeks a stay on all meetings, seminars and demonstrations in support of the Sanatana Dharma Eradication Conference and any other orders the court deems appropriate.

Earlier, an interlocutory application was moved before the apex court seeking registration of an FIR against DMK leaders Udhayanidhi Stalin and Lok Sabha MP A Raja. Furthermore, an FIR has been registered in Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, against Udhayanidhi Stalin and Mallikarjun Kharge’s son Priyank Kharge for their alleged hate speech against Sanatana Dharma.

Notably, over 260 eminent citizens, including former judges and bureaucrats, earlier wrote to the CJI urging him to take cognisance of Udhayanidhi Stalin’s statement calling for the eradication of Sanatana Dharma.

Topics: Supreme CourtTamil NaduDY ChandrachudMk StalinSanatan DharmaUdhayanidhi StalinAbolish Sanatan Dharma ConclaveSanatan Dharma Eradication Conference
ShareTweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

‘Make in India’ solutions through HSRIC in the field of High Speed Railway System

Next News

Department of Telecommunications conducts another pan-India ’emergency alert’ test

Related News

The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court allows extra support for overburdened BLOs, says SIR duties are mandatory for government staff

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee

West Bengal: NCBC delists 35 Muslim castes wrongly included in OBC category; Mamata govt’s appeasement politics exposed

Representation image of a Muslim woman (Tribune)

Supreme Court secures property rights of divorced Muslim women in landmark verdict

Tamil Nadu: DMK government’s false GST narrative against central government falls flat against data

Supreme Court tears into Rohingya plea, says ‘Illegal entrants cannot claim rights meant for Indian citizens’

Supreme Court questions extending rights to illegal Rohingya entrants amid rising security fears

Supreme Court flags security concerns as Rohingya Habeas plea triggers sharp remarks

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

Thirupparankundram Karthigai Deepam utsav

Andhra Pradesh: AP Dy CM Pawan Kalyan reacts to Thirupparankundram row, flags concern over religious rights of Hindus

23rd India-Russia Annual Summit

India-Russia Summit heralds new chapter in time-tested ties: Inks MoUs in economic, defence, tourism & education

DGCA orders probe into IndiGo flight disruptions; Committee to report in 15 days

BJYM leader Shyamraj with Janaki

Kerala: Widow of BJP worker murdered in 1995 steps into electoral battle after three decades at Valancherry

Russian Sber bank has unveiled access to its retail investors to the Indian stock market by etching its mutual fund to Nifty50

Scripting economic bonhomie: Russian investors gain access to Indian stocks, Sber unveils Nifty50 pegged mutual funds

Petitioner S Vignesh Shishir speaking to the reporters about the Rahul Gandhi UK citizenship case outside the Raebareli court

Rahul Gandhi UK Citizenship Case: Congress supporters create ruckus in court; Foreign visit details shared with judge

(L) Kerala High Court (R) Bouncers in Trippoonithura temple

Kerala: HC slams CPM-controlled Kochi Devaswom Board for deploying bouncers for crowd management during festival

Fact Check: Rahul Gandhi false claim about govt blocking his meet with Russian President Putin exposed; MEA clears air

Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari (Right)

India set for highway overhaul as Union Minister Nitin Gadkari unveils nationwide shift to MLFF electronic tolling

RSS Akhil Bharatiya Prachar Pramukh Shri Sunil Ambekar

When Narrative Wars result in bloodshed, countering them becomes imperative: Sunil Ambekar

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies