Collegium discussions can't be put out in the public domain through RTI: Supreme Court
December 5, 2025
  • Read Ecopy
  • Circulation
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Android AppiPhone AppArattai
Organiser
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
  • ‌
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • International
  • Opinion
  • RSS @ 100
  • More
    • Op Sindoor
    • Analysis
    • Sports
    • Defence
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Culture
    • Special Report
    • Sci & Tech
    • Entertainment
    • G20
    • Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav
    • Vocal4Local
    • Web Stories
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Law
    • Health
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe
    • Subscribe Print Edition
    • Subscribe Ecopy
    • Read Ecopy
Organiser
  • Home
  • Bharat
  • World
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Editorial
  • Analysis
  • Opinion
  • Culture
  • Defence
  • International Edition
  • RSS @ 100
  • Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
Home Bharat

Collegium discussions can’t be put out in the public domain through RTI: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking to uncover details under the Right to Information (RTI) of a collegium meeting in which decisions were taken about the elevation of judges to the apex court.

WEBDESKWEBDESK
Dec 10, 2022, 07:53 pm IST
in Bharat
Follow on Google News
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegramEmail

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea seeking to uncover details under the Right to Information (RTI) of a collegium meeting in which decisions were taken about the elevation of judges to the apex court.

A bench headed by Justice M.R. Shah said, “Only a resolution drawn and signed by all the collegium members can be said to be the final decision…”

The bench added that “it is to be noted that final decision is taken by the collegium only after due consultation and during the consultation some decision takes place, but no final decision is taken and no resolution is drawn, it cannot be said that a final decision is taken by the collegium”.

“Collegium is a multi-member body whose decision embodies into the resolution that may be formally drawn up and signed…,” said the bench, adding that only the final decision needed to be uploaded on the Supreme Court’s website.

It further added that whatever was debated in the collegium was not required to be placed out in the public domain, that too under the RTI Act.

The top court judgment came on a petition by activist Anjali Bhardwaj against the Delhi High Court order, which dismissed her plea seeking the apex court collegium’s agenda in connection with a meeting held on December 12, 2018, when certain findings were purportedly taken on the elevation of some judges to the apex court.

On December 2, the Supreme Court, taking a dig at retired judges, said, “It has become a fashion for them to comment about earlier decisions taken by the collegium, and the existing collegium system should not be derailed on the basis of statements of some busybody”. The apex court highlighted that the collegium was the most transparent establishment.

The bench told that it did not want to make comment on what a few former apex court judges, who were once members of the Supreme Court Collegium, were now saying about the mechanism.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioner RTI activist Anjali Bhardwaj, said Justice Madan Lokur, former apex court judge, who was part of the Supreme Court Collegium in 2018, had said that one of the decisions, should have been uploaded on the Supreme Court website.

The bench said, “Nowadays, it has become a fashion to comment upon earlier decisions (of the collegium) made when they (former judges) were part of the collegium”. It further added, “We don’t want to say anything about their comments”.

The Collegium, which was headed by then CJI Ranjan Gogoi and comprising four senior-most judges Justices Lokur, A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde, and N.V. Ramana brought certain decisions about the appointment of judges. However, facts were not uploaded on the website. In January 2019, the collegium reconsidered the decisions “in the light of additional materials”.

Topics: Supreme CourtPrashant BhushanRight to InformationCollegium discussionsCJI Ranjan Gogoi
Share5TweetSendShareSend
✮ Subscribe Organiser YouTube Channel. ✮
✮ Join Organiser's WhatsApp channel for Nationalist views beyond the news. ✮
Previous News

RAKSHA MANTRI HOLDS 4TH INDIA-FRANCE ANNUAL DEFENCE DIALOGUE WITH MINISTER OF ARMED FORCES OF FRANCE

Next News

US journalist who was detained for wearing LGBTQ T-shirt dies mysteriously in Qatar

Related News

The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court allows extra support for overburdened BLOs, says SIR duties are mandatory for government staff

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee

West Bengal: NCBC delists 35 Muslim castes wrongly included in OBC category; Mamata govt’s appeasement politics exposed

Representation image of a Muslim woman (Tribune)

Supreme Court secures property rights of divorced Muslim women in landmark verdict

Supreme Court tears into Rohingya plea, says ‘Illegal entrants cannot claim rights meant for Indian citizens’

Supreme Court questions extending rights to illegal Rohingya entrants amid rising security fears

Supreme Court flags security concerns as Rohingya Habeas plea triggers sharp remarks

SC to Waqf Boards: Fix your own mess; UMEED portal deadline remains December 6

Load More

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Organiser. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

PM Modi presents Putin with Bhagavad Gita, chess set, and silver horse

Cultural ties strengthened: PM Modi presents Putin with Bhagavad Gita, chess set, and silver horse

Image for representational purpose only, Courtesy Vocal Media

Bihar to get ‘Special Economic Zones’ in Buxar and West Champaran

Thirupparankundram Karthigai Deepam utsav

Andhra Pradesh: AP Dy CM Pawan Kalyan reacts to Thirupparankundram row, flags concern over religious rights of Hindus

23rd India-Russia Annual Summit

India-Russia Summit heralds new chapter in time-tested ties: Inks MoUs in economic, defence, tourism & education

DGCA orders probe into IndiGo flight disruptions; Committee to report in 15 days

BJYM leader Shyamraj with Janaki

Kerala: Widow of BJP worker murdered in 1995 steps into electoral battle after three decades at Valancherry

Russian Sber bank has unveiled access to its retail investors to the Indian stock market by etching its mutual fund to Nifty50

Scripting economic bonhomie: Russian investors gain access to Indian stocks, Sber unveils Nifty50 pegged mutual funds

Petitioner S Vignesh Shishir speaking to the reporters about the Rahul Gandhi UK citizenship case outside the Raebareli court

Rahul Gandhi UK Citizenship Case: Congress supporters create ruckus in court; Foreign visit details shared with judge

(L) Kerala High Court (R) Bouncers in Trippoonithura temple

Kerala: HC slams CPM-controlled Kochi Devaswom Board for deploying bouncers for crowd management during festival

Fact Check: Rahul Gandhi false claim about govt blocking his meet with Russian President Putin exposed; MEA clears air

Load More
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Cookie Policy
  • Refund and Cancellation
  • Delivery and Shipping

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

  • Home
  • Search Organiser
  • Bharat
    • Assam
    • Bihar
    • Chhattisgarh
    • Jharkhand
    • Maharashtra
    • View All States
  • World
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • South America
    • Europe
    • Australia
  • Editorial
  • Operation Sindoor
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Defence
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Business
  • RSS @ 100
  • Entertainment
  • More ..
    • Sci & Tech
    • Vocal4Local
    • Special Report
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Books
    • Interviews
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Law
    • Economy
    • Obituary
  • Subscribe Magazine
  • Read Ecopy
  • Advertise
  • Circulation
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Policies & Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • Refund and Cancellation
    • Terms of Use

© Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies